Esophageal insufflation computed tomography in clinically normal dogs

Sungkyun Hong Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Sungkyun Hong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Siheon Lee Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Siheon Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sangkyung Choen Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Sangkyung Choen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jaewoo Hwang Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Jaewoo Hwang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Moonjung Jang Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Moonjung Jang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Junghee Yoon Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Junghee Yoon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Mincheol Choi Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, Research Institute for Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.

Search for other papers by Mincheol Choi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of esophageal insufflation CT (EICT) for evaluation of the esophagus in dogs.

ANIMALS 7 clinically normal adult Beagles.

PROCEDURES Each dog was anesthetized twice with 1 week between anesthesia sessions. Dogs were positioned in sternal recumbency during all CT scans. During the first anesthesia session, a CT scan was performed before the esophagus was insufflated (insufflation pressure, 0 mm Hg) and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced EICT scans were performed after CO2 was insufflated into the esophageal lumen to achieve a pressure of 5 mm Hg. For the contrast-enhanced scan, each dog received iohexol (600 mg/kg, IV), and the scan was performed 30 seconds later. During the second anesthesia session, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced EICT scans were performed in the same manner except the insufflation pressure achieved was 10 mm Hg. The esophageal luminal cross-sectional area and wall thickness were measured at each of 5 segments, and mean values were compared among the 3 insufflation pressures and between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images.

RESULTS Mean esophageal luminal cross-sectional area increased and esophageal wall thickness decreased as insufflation pressure increased. Measurements did not differ significantly between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. The stomach became distended with CO2 at an insufflation pressure of 10 mm Hg but not at 5 mm Hg. No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested EICT was feasible for esophageal evaluation in dogs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal insufflation pressure for the procedure and its diagnostic efficacy in diseased patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of esophageal insufflation CT (EICT) for evaluation of the esophagus in dogs.

ANIMALS 7 clinically normal adult Beagles.

PROCEDURES Each dog was anesthetized twice with 1 week between anesthesia sessions. Dogs were positioned in sternal recumbency during all CT scans. During the first anesthesia session, a CT scan was performed before the esophagus was insufflated (insufflation pressure, 0 mm Hg) and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced EICT scans were performed after CO2 was insufflated into the esophageal lumen to achieve a pressure of 5 mm Hg. For the contrast-enhanced scan, each dog received iohexol (600 mg/kg, IV), and the scan was performed 30 seconds later. During the second anesthesia session, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced EICT scans were performed in the same manner except the insufflation pressure achieved was 10 mm Hg. The esophageal luminal cross-sectional area and wall thickness were measured at each of 5 segments, and mean values were compared among the 3 insufflation pressures and between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images.

RESULTS Mean esophageal luminal cross-sectional area increased and esophageal wall thickness decreased as insufflation pressure increased. Measurements did not differ significantly between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. The stomach became distended with CO2 at an insufflation pressure of 10 mm Hg but not at 5 mm Hg. No adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested EICT was feasible for esophageal evaluation in dogs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal insufflation pressure for the procedure and its diagnostic efficacy in diseased patients.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Choi (mcchoi@snu.ac.kr).
  • 1. Baloi PA, Kircher PR, Kook PH. Endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation of the esophagus in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 2013;74:1005–1009.

  • 2. Guiford WG. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In: Constantinescu GM, McCarthy TC, eds. Veterinary endoscopy for the small animal practitioner. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2005;279–321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Kirberger RM, van der Merwe LL, Dvir E. Pneumoesophagography and the appearance of masses in the caudal portion of the esophagus in dogs with spirocercosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;240:420–426.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Kirberger RM, Cassel N, Stander N, et al. Triple phase dynamic computed tomographic perfusion characteristics of spirocercosis induced esophageal nodules in non-neoplasitic versus neoplastic canine cases. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015;56:257–263.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Ulla M, Gentile EMJ, Cavadas D, et al. Esophageal cancer characterization with pneumo-64-MDCT. Abdom Imaging 2012;37:501–511.

  • 6. Brissot HN, Burton CA, Doyle RS, et al. Caudal mediastinal paraesophageal abscesses in 7 dogs. Vet Surg 2012;41:286–291.

  • 7. OnbaÅŸ O, Eroglu A, Kantarci M, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma with multidetector CT and virtual endoscopy. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:90–95.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Gennai A, et al. Multidetector CT and virtual endoscopy in the evaluation of the esophagus. Abdom Imaging 2004;29:2–8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Ulla M, Gentile E, Yeyati EL, et al. Pneumo-CT assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: imaging-pathological correlation. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2013;5:222–229.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Petite A, Kirbergr R. Mediastinum. In: Schwarz T, Saunders J, eds. Veterinary computed tomography. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 2011;249–260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Liu BR, Liu BL, Wang XH, et al. Esophageal insufflation computed tomography for the diagnosis and management of esophageal submucosal tumors. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2350–2355.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Ulla M, Cavadas D, Muñoz I, et al. Esophageal cancer: pneumo-64-MDCT. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:383–389.

  • 13. Hoey S, Drees R, Hetzel S. Evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in dogs using computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54:25–30.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Vignoli M, Saunders J. Gastrointetinal tract. In: Schwarz T, Saunders J, eds. Veterinary computed tomography. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 2011;325–330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Steffey MA, Daniel L, Taylor SL, et al. Computed tomographic pneumocolonography in normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015;56:278–285.

  • 16. Terragni R, Vignoli M, Rossi F, et al. Stomach wall evaluation using helical hydro-computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012;53:402–405.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Yamada K, Morimoto M, Kishimoto M, et al. Virtual endoscopy of dogs using multi-detector row CT. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:318–322.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Kyles AE. Esophagus. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, eds. Veterinary surgery: small animal. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2012;1461–1483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Evans HE, De Lahunta A. The digestive apparatus and abdomen. In: Miller's anatomy of the dog. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2013;304–307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Pettersson GB, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM. The lower esophageal sphincter: mechanisms of opening and closure. Surgery 1980;88:307–314.

  • 21. Ferris BG Jr, Mead J, Frank NR. Effect of body position on esophageal pressure and measurement of pulmonary compliance. J Appl Physiol 1959;14:521–524.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Fukushima FB, Malm C, Andrade ME, et al. Cardiorespiratory and blood gas alterations during laparoscopic surgery for intrauterine artificial insemination in dogs. Can Vet J 2011;52:77–79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Maeda Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:7373–7382.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement