Reference limits for hepatic bile duct-to-arteriole and bile duct-to-portal tract ratios in healthy cats

Alyssa M. Chandler Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Alyssa M. Chandler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sharon A. Center Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Sharon A. Center in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
John F. Randolph Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by John F. Randolph in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Danielle L. Davignon Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Danielle L. Davignon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sean P. McDonough Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Sean P. McDonough in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Karen L. Warner Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Karen L. Warner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish reference limits for hepatic bile duct-to-arteriole ratio (BD:A) and bile duct-to-portal tract ratio (BD:PT) in healthy cats and assess whether these parameters could be used to support a diagnosis of biliary ductopenia in cats.

SAMPLE Hepatic biopsy samples from healthy cats (n = 20) and cats with ductopenia (2).

PROCEDURES Hepatic biopsy samples from healthy cats were used to count the number of bile ducts and hepatic arterioles in 20 portal tracts for each cat. Mean BD:A and mean BD:PT for each cat were calculated, and these values were used to determine reference limits for mean BD:A and mean BD:PT. Results of histologic evaluation, including immunohistochemical staining in some instances, were compared for healthy cats versus cats with ductopenia.

RESULTS Of the 400 portal tracts from healthy cats, 382 (95.5%) and 396 (99.0%) had BD:A and BD:PT, respectively, ≥ 1.0, with less variability in BD:A. Mean BD:A and BD:PT were markedly lower in both cats with ductopenia, compared with values for healthy cats. However, only mean BD:A for cats with ductopenia was below the reference limit of 0.59.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that systematic evaluation of BD:A, with a lower reference limit of 0.59 to define biliary ductopenia in cats, may be a discrete and easily applied morphometric tool to enhance detection of ductopenia in cats. However, application of this ratio required evaluation of ≥ 20 portal tracts with cross-sectioned portal elements to determine a mean BD:A value.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish reference limits for hepatic bile duct-to-arteriole ratio (BD:A) and bile duct-to-portal tract ratio (BD:PT) in healthy cats and assess whether these parameters could be used to support a diagnosis of biliary ductopenia in cats.

SAMPLE Hepatic biopsy samples from healthy cats (n = 20) and cats with ductopenia (2).

PROCEDURES Hepatic biopsy samples from healthy cats were used to count the number of bile ducts and hepatic arterioles in 20 portal tracts for each cat. Mean BD:A and mean BD:PT for each cat were calculated, and these values were used to determine reference limits for mean BD:A and mean BD:PT. Results of histologic evaluation, including immunohistochemical staining in some instances, were compared for healthy cats versus cats with ductopenia.

RESULTS Of the 400 portal tracts from healthy cats, 382 (95.5%) and 396 (99.0%) had BD:A and BD:PT, respectively, ≥ 1.0, with less variability in BD:A. Mean BD:A and BD:PT were markedly lower in both cats with ductopenia, compared with values for healthy cats. However, only mean BD:A for cats with ductopenia was below the reference limit of 0.59.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that systematic evaluation of BD:A, with a lower reference limit of 0.59 to define biliary ductopenia in cats, may be a discrete and easily applied morphometric tool to enhance detection of ductopenia in cats. However, application of this ratio required evaluation of ≥ 20 portal tracts with cross-sectioned portal elements to determine a mean BD:A value.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Center (sac6@cornell.edu).

Dr. Davignon's present address is Veterinary Medical Center, 5841 Ridge St, East Syracuse, NY 13057.

  • 1. Nakanuma Y, Tsuneyama K, Harada K. Pathology and pathogenesis of intrahepatic bile duct loss. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001;8:303315.

  • 2. Ludwig J, Wiesner RH, LaRusso NF. Idiopathic adulthood ductopenia: a cause of chronic cholestatic liver disease and biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1988;7:193199.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Crawford AR, Lin X-Z, Crawford JM. The normal adult human liver biopsy: a quantitative reference standard. Hepatology 1998;28:323331.

  • 4. West AB, Chatila R. Differential diagnosis of bile duct injury and ductopenia. Semin Diagn Pathol 1998;15:270284.

  • 5. Zen Y, Hubscher SG, Nakanuma Y. Bile duct diseases. In: Burt AD, Ferrell LD, Hubscher SG, eds. MacSween's pathology of the liver. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2018;515593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Deltenre P, Valla DC. Ischemic cholangiopathy. J Hepatol 2006;44:806817.

  • 7. Kaung A, Sundaram V, Dhall D, et al. A case of mild idiopathic adulthood ductopenia and brief review of literature. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015;3:167169.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Bilal M, Kazemi A, Babich M. Idiopathic adulthood ductopenia: ‘It is out there'. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2016;10:9598.

  • 9. Asai A, Miethke A, Bezerra JA. Pathogenesis of biliary atresia: defining biology to understand clinical phenotypes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;12:342352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Center SA. Diseases of the gallbladder and biliary tree. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009;39:543598.

  • 11. Warren A, Center S, McDonough S, et al. Histopathologic features, immunophenotyping, clonality, and eubacterial fluorescence in situ hybridization in cats with lymphocytic cholangitis/cholangiohepatitis. Vet Pathol 2011;48:627641.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. MacDonald RA. “Lifespan” of liver cells: autoradiographic study using tritiated thymidine in normal, cirrhotic, and partially hepatectomized rats. Arch Intern Med 1961;107:335343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Eldridge SR, Goldsworthy SM. Cell proliferative rates in common cancer target tissues of B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats: effect of age, gender, and choice of marker. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1996;32:159167.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Iatropoulos MJ, Williams GM. Proliferation markers. Exp Toxicol Pathol 1996;48:175181.

  • 15. Solberg HE. Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. Clin Chim Acta 1987;170:S13S32.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Hurwitz BM, Center SA, Randolph JF, et al. Presumed primary and secondary hepatic copper accumulation in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244:6877.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Otte CM, Rothuizen J, Favier RP, et al. A morphological and immunohistochemical study of the effects of prednisolone or ursodeoxycholic acid on liver histology in feline lymphocytic cholangitis. J Feline Med Surg 2014;16:796804.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Sasaki H, Nio M, Iwami D, et al. Cytokeratin subtypes in biliary atresia: immunohistochemical study. Pathol Int 2001;51:511518.

  • 19. Herrmann H, Aebi U. Intermediate filaments: structure and assembly. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:a018242.

  • 20. Osborn M, van Lessen G, Weber K, et al. Differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal carcinomas by using monoclonal antibodies specific for individual keratin polypeptides. Lab Invest 1986;55:497504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Ramaekers F, Huysmans A, Schaart G, et al. Tissue distribution of keratin 7 as monitored by a monoclonal antibody. Exp Cell Res 1987;170:235249.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. van Eyken P, Sciot R, van Damme B, et al. Keratin immuno-histochemistry in normal human liver. Cytokeratin pattern of hepatocytes, bile ducts and acinar gradient. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1987;412:6372.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Cattoretti G, Becker MH, Key G, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Pathol 1992;168:357363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Gerdes J, Becker MH, Key G, et al. Immunohistological detection of tumour growth fraction (Ki-67 antigen) in formalin-fixed and routinely processed tissues. J Pathol 1992;168:8586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. McCormick D, Chong H, Hobbs C, et al. Detection of the Ki-67 antigen in fixed and wax-embedded sections with the monoclonal antibody MIB1. Histopathology 1993;22:355360.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Cuylen S, Blaukopf C, Politi AZ, et al. Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes. Nature 2016;535:308312.

  • 27. Goldfarb S, Singer EJ, Popper H. Experimental cholangitis due to alpha-naphthyl-isothiocyanate (ANIT). Am J Pathol 1962;40:685698.

  • 28. Moslen MT, Dunsford HA, Karnasuta C, et al. Histochemical and immunocytochemical evidence of early, selective bile canaliculi injury after 1,1-dichloroethylene in rats. Am J Pathol 1989;134:10991112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Dahm LJ, Schultze AE, Roth RA. An antibody to neutrophils attenuates alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate-induced liver injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991;256:412420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Roth RA, Dahm LJ. Neutrophil- and glutathione-mediated hepatotoxicity of alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate. Drug Metab Rev 1997;29:153165.

  • 31. Geubel AP, Sempoux CL. Drug and toxin-induced bile duct disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:12321238.

  • 32. Bonkovsky HL, Kleiner DE, Gu J, et al. Clinical presentations and outcomes of bile duct loss caused by drugs and herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology 2017;65:12671277.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Desmet VJ. Intrahepatic bile ducts under the lens. J Hepatol 1985;1:545559.

  • 34. Davies MH, Harrison RF, Elias E, et al. Antibiotic-associated acute vanishing bile duct syndrome: a pattern associated with severe, prolonged, intrahepatic cholestasis. J Hepatol 1994;20:112116.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Reau NS, Jensen DM. Vanishing bile duct syndrome. Clin Liver Dis 2008;12:203217.

  • 36. Davit-Spraul A, Fabre M, Brachereau S, et al. ATP8B1 and ABCB11 analysis in 62 children with normal gamma-glutamyl transferase progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC): phenotypic differences between PFIC1 and PFIC2 and natural history. Hepatology 2010;51:16451655.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Davit-Spraul A, Gonzales E, Baussan C, et al. The spectrum of liver diseases related to ABCB4 gene mutations: pathophysiology and clinical aspects. Semin Liver Dis 2010;30:134146.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Jacquemin E. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012;36(suppl 1):S26S35.

  • 39. Nguyen KD, Sundaram V, Ayoub WS. Atypical causes of cholestasis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:94189426.

  • 40. Srivastava A. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2014;4:2536.

  • 41. Cariello M, Piccinin E, Garcia-Irigoyen O, et al. Nuclear receptor FXR, bile acids and liver damage: introducing the progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis with FXR mutations. Biochim Biophys Acta 2018;1864:13081318.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement