Effect of blood contamination on results of dipstick evaluation and urine protein-to-urine creatinine ratio for urine samples from dogs and cats

Aida I. Vientós-Plotts Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Aida I. Vientós-Plotts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Ellen N. Behrend Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Ellen N. Behrend in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, PhD
,
Elizabeth G. Welles Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Elizabeth G. Welles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Dennis J. Chew Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Dennis J. Chew in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Philippe R. Gaillard Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Philippe R. Gaillard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jessica N. Busler Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Jessica N. Busler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Hollie P. Lee Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.

Search for other papers by Hollie P. Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate effects of blood contamination on dipstick results, specific gravity (SG), and urine protein-to-urine creatinine ratio (UPCR) for urine samples from dogs and cats.

SAMPLE Urine samples collected from 279 dogs and 120 cats.

PROCEDURES Urine pools were made for each species (dogs [n = 60] and cats [30]). Blood was added to an aliquot of a pool, and serial dilutions were prepared with the remaining urine. Color and dipstick variables were recorded, and SG and UPCR were measured. For cats, 1 set of pools was used; for dogs, 2 sets were used. Comparisons were made between undiluted urine and spiked urine samples for individual colors. Repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was used to compare dipstick scores and UPCR results; χ2 tests were used to compare proteinuria categorizations (nonproteinuric, borderline, or proteinuric).

RESULTS Any blood in the urine resulted in significantly increased dipstick scores for blood. In both species, scores for bilirubin and ketones, pH, and SG were affected by visible blood contamination. No significant difference for the dipstick protein reagent results was evident until a sample was visibly hematuric. The UPCR was significantly increased in dark yellow samples of both species. Proteinuria categorizations differed significantly between undiluted urine and urine of all colors, except light yellow.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Any degree of blood contamination affected results of dipstick analysis. Effects depended on urine color and the variable measured. Microscopic blood contamination may affect the UPCR; thus, blood contamination may be a differential diagnosis for proteinuria in yellow urine samples.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate effects of blood contamination on dipstick results, specific gravity (SG), and urine protein-to-urine creatinine ratio (UPCR) for urine samples from dogs and cats.

SAMPLE Urine samples collected from 279 dogs and 120 cats.

PROCEDURES Urine pools were made for each species (dogs [n = 60] and cats [30]). Blood was added to an aliquot of a pool, and serial dilutions were prepared with the remaining urine. Color and dipstick variables were recorded, and SG and UPCR were measured. For cats, 1 set of pools was used; for dogs, 2 sets were used. Comparisons were made between undiluted urine and spiked urine samples for individual colors. Repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was used to compare dipstick scores and UPCR results; χ2 tests were used to compare proteinuria categorizations (nonproteinuric, borderline, or proteinuric).

RESULTS Any blood in the urine resulted in significantly increased dipstick scores for blood. In both species, scores for bilirubin and ketones, pH, and SG were affected by visible blood contamination. No significant difference for the dipstick protein reagent results was evident until a sample was visibly hematuric. The UPCR was significantly increased in dark yellow samples of both species. Proteinuria categorizations differed significantly between undiluted urine and urine of all colors, except light yellow.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Any degree of blood contamination affected results of dipstick analysis. Effects depended on urine color and the variable measured. Microscopic blood contamination may affect the UPCR; thus, blood contamination may be a differential diagnosis for proteinuria in yellow urine samples.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2030 735 59
PDF Downloads 1528 469 40
Advertisement