Comparison of desflurane and propofol at equipotent doses in combination with a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine on global and peripheral perfusion and oxygenation in horses

Stephan Neudeck Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Stephan Neudeck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Med Vet
,
Sabine B. R. Kästner Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Sabine B. R. Kästner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Prof Dr Med Vet
,
Liza Wittenberg-Voges Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Liza Wittenberg-Voges in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Med Vet
,
Karl Rohn Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Data Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Karl Rohn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Med Vet
, and
Klaus Hopster Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Klaus Hopster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Med Vet

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine global and peripheral perfusion and oxygenation during anesthesia with equipotent doses of desflurane and propofol combined with a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine in horses.

ANIMALS 6 warmblood horses.

PROCEDURES Horses were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (3.5 μg•kg−1, IV). Anesthesia was induced with propofol or ketamine and maintained with desflurane or propofol (complete crossover design) combined with a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine (7 μg•kg−1 •h−1). Microperfusion and oxygenation of the rectal, oral, and esophageal mucosa were measured before and after sedation and during anesthesia at the minimal alveolar concentration and minimal infusion rate. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, cardiac output, and blood gas pressures were recorded during anesthesia.

RESULTS Mean ± SD minimal alveolar concentration and minimal infusion rate were 2.6 ± 0.9% and 0.04 ± 0.01 mg•kg−1 •min−1, respectively. Peripheral microperfusion and oxygenation decreased significantly after dexmedetomidine administration for both treatments. Oxygenation returned to baseline values, whereas tissue microperfusion remained low during anesthesia. There were no differences in peripheral tissue microperfusion and oxygenation between treatments. Cardiac index was significantly higher and systemic vascular resistance was significantly lower for desflurane treatment than for propofol treatment. For the propofol treatment, Pao2 was significantly higher and there was less dead space and venous admixture than for the desflurane treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Dexmedetomidine decreased blood flow and oxygen saturation in peripheral tissues. Peripheral tissues were well oxygenated during anesthesia with desflurane and propofol combined with dexmedetomidine, whereas blood flow was reduced.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine global and peripheral perfusion and oxygenation during anesthesia with equipotent doses of desflurane and propofol combined with a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine in horses.

ANIMALS 6 warmblood horses.

PROCEDURES Horses were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (3.5 μg•kg−1, IV). Anesthesia was induced with propofol or ketamine and maintained with desflurane or propofol (complete crossover design) combined with a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine (7 μg•kg−1 •h−1). Microperfusion and oxygenation of the rectal, oral, and esophageal mucosa were measured before and after sedation and during anesthesia at the minimal alveolar concentration and minimal infusion rate. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, cardiac output, and blood gas pressures were recorded during anesthesia.

RESULTS Mean ± SD minimal alveolar concentration and minimal infusion rate were 2.6 ± 0.9% and 0.04 ± 0.01 mg•kg−1 •min−1, respectively. Peripheral microperfusion and oxygenation decreased significantly after dexmedetomidine administration for both treatments. Oxygenation returned to baseline values, whereas tissue microperfusion remained low during anesthesia. There were no differences in peripheral tissue microperfusion and oxygenation between treatments. Cardiac index was significantly higher and systemic vascular resistance was significantly lower for desflurane treatment than for propofol treatment. For the propofol treatment, Pao2 was significantly higher and there was less dead space and venous admixture than for the desflurane treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Dexmedetomidine decreased blood flow and oxygen saturation in peripheral tissues. Peripheral tissues were well oxygenated during anesthesia with desflurane and propofol combined with dexmedetomidine, whereas blood flow was reduced.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 89 0 0
Full Text Views 567 324 96
PDF Downloads 284 99 6
Advertisement