1. Bleicher N, Sloan RF, Gault IG, et al. Cleft palate in a dog. Cleft Palate J 1965; 45:56–61.
2. Calnan J. The comparative anatomy of cleft lip and palate. I. Classification of cleft lip and palate in dogs. Br J Plast Surg 1961; 14:180–184.
3. Dreyer CJ, Preston CB. Classification of cleft lip and palate in animals. Cleft Palate J 1974; 11:327–332.
4. Mulvihill JJ, Mulvihill CG, Priester WA. Cleft palate in domestic animals: epidemiologic features. Teratology 1980; 21:109–112.
5. Shupe JL, James LF, Binns W, et al. Cleft palate in cattle. Cleft Palate J 1968; 5:346–355.
6. Shaw SD, Norman TE, Arnold CE, et al. Clinical characteristics of horses and foals diagnosed with cleft palate in a referral population: 28 cases (1988–2011). Can Vet J 2015; 56:756–760.
7. Watkins SE, Meyer RE, Strauss RP, et al. Classification, epidemiology, and genetics of orofacial clefts. Clin Plast Surg 2014; 41:149–163.
8. Luijsterburg AJ, Rozendaal AM, Vermeij-Keers C. Classifying common oral clefts: a new approach after descriptive registration. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014; 51:381–391.
9. Nemec A, Daniaux L, Johnson E, et al. Craniomaxillofacial abnormalities in dogs with congenital palatal defects: computed tomographic findings. Vet Surg 2015; 44:417–422.
10. Zacher AM, Marretta SM. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2013; 43:609–649.
11. Magee WP Jr, Vander Burg R, Hatcher KW. Cleft lip and palate as a cost-effective health care treatment in the developing world. World J Surg 2010; 34:420–427.
12. Peralta S, Nemec A, Fiani N, et al. Staged double-layer closure of palatal defects in 6 dogs. Vet Surg 2015; 44:423–431.
13. Bush JO, Jiang R. Palatogenesis: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development 2012; 139:231–243.
14. Yoshida H, Nakamura A, Michi K, et al. Cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial morphology in unoperated cleft palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992; 29:419–424.
15. Daigavane PS, Hazarey PV, Niranjane P, et al. A new classification system for unilateral cleft lip and palate infants to assist presurgical infant orthopedics. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39:231–234.
16. Rossell-Perry P. New diagram for cleft lip and palate description: the clock diagram. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46:305–313.
17. Rossell-Perry P, Caceres Nano E, Gavino-Gutierrez AM. Association between palatal index and cleft palate repair outcomes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16:206–210.
18. Luijsterburg AJ, Vermeij-Keers C. Ten years recording common oral clefts with a new descriptive system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011; 48:173–182.
19. Härtel J, Kriens O, Kundt G. Incidence of cleft lip, alveolus and palate forms. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991; 19:144–146.
20. Wang BC, Hakimi M, Martin MC. Use of two cleft lip and palate classification systems by nonsubspecialized health care providers. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014; 51:540–543.
21. Wang KH, Heike CL, Clarkson M, et al. Evaluation and integration of disparate classification systems for clefts of the lip. Front Physiol 2014; 14:163.
22. Kernahan DA. On cleft lip and palate classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51:578.
23. Khan M, Ullah H, Naz S, et al. A revised classification of the cleft lip and palate. Can J Plast Surg 2013; 21:48–50.
24. Taub PJ, Silver L. Cleft and craniofacial coding in ICD-10. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2016; 53:e81–e83.
25. Koch H, Grzonka M, Koch J. Cleft malformation of lip, alveolus, hard and soft palate, and nose (LAHSN)—a critical view of the terminology, the diagnosis and gradation as a basis for documentation and therapy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33:51–58.
26. Pruzansky S. Description, classification, and analysis of unoperated clefts of the lip and palate. Am J Orthod 1953; 39:590–611.
27. Carroll K, Mossey PA. Anatomical variations in clefts of the lip with or without cleft palate. Plast Surg Int 2012; 2012:542078.
28. Reinartz S, Hellige M, Feige K, et al. Phenotypic classification of variability of non-syndromic congenital cleft lip and jaw in Vorderwald x Montbeliarde cattle. Acta Vet Scand 2015; 57:87.
29. Evans HE, de Lahunta A. Miller's anatomy of the dog. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013; 84–88.
30. Wolf ZT, Leslie EJ, Arzi B, et al. A LINE-1 insertion in DLX6 is responsible for cleft palate and mandibular abnormalities in a canine model of Pierre Robin sequence. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004257.
31. Kelly KM, Bardach J. Biologic basis of cleft palate and palatal surgery. In: Verstraete FJ, Lommer MJ, eds. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. Oxford, England: WB Saunders, 2012; 343–350.
32. Manfra Marretta S. Cleft palate repair techniques. In: Verstraete FJ, Lommer MJ, eds. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. Oxford, England: WB Saunders, 2012; 351–361.
33. Wei X, Senders C, Owiti GO, et al. The origin and development of the upper lateral incisor and premaxilla in normal and cleft lip/palate monkeys induced with cyclophosphamide. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37:571–583.
34. Jamilian A, Lucchese A, Darnahal A, et al. Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate patients. Prog Orthod 2016; 17:14.
35. Moura E, Cirio SM, Pimpao CT. Nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate in Boxer dogs: evidence of monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012; 49:759–760.
Advertisement
OBJECTIVE To systematically characterize the morphology of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate in dogs.
ANIMALS 32 client-owned dogs with clefts of the lip (n = 5), palate (23), or both (4) that had undergone a CT or cone-beam CT scan of the head prior to any surgical procedures involving the oral cavity or face.
PROCEDURES Dog signalment and skull type were recorded. The anatomic form of each defect was characterized by use of a widely used human oral-cleft classification system on the basis of CT findings and clinical images. Other defect morphological features, including shape, relative size, facial symmetry, and vomer involvement, were also recorded.
RESULTS 9 anatomic forms of cleft were identified. Two anatomic forms were identified in the 23 dogs with cleft palate, in which differences in defect shape and size as well as vomer abnormalities were also evident. Seven anatomic forms were observed in 9 dogs with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate, and most of these dogs had incisive bone abnormalities and facial asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The morphological features of congenitally acquired cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate were complex and varied among dogs. The features identified here may be useful for surgical planning, developing of clinical coding schemes, or informing genetic, embryological, or clinical research into birth defects in dogs and other species.