Evaluation of gene expression and DNA copy number profiles of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells and consecutive neurosphere-like cells generated from dogs with naturally occurring spinal cord injury

Ji-Hey Lim Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Ji-Hey Lim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Sehwon Koh Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Sehwon Koh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Rachael Thomas Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.
Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Rachael Thomas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Matthew Breen Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.
Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Matthew Breen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Natasha J. Olby Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.
Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Natasha J. Olby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VET MB, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate gene expression and DNA copy number in adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) and in ADSC-derived neurosphere-like cell clusters (ADSC-NSCs) generated from tissues of chronically paraplegic dogs.

ANIMALS 14 client-owned paraplegic dogs.

PROCEDURES Dorsal subcutaneous adipose tissue (< 1 cm3) was collected under general anesthesia; ADSCs were isolated and cultured. Third-passage ADSCs were cultured in neural cell induction medium to generate ADSC-NSCs. Relative gene expression of mesenchymal cell surface marker CD90 and neural progenitor marker nestin was assessed in ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs from 3 dogs by quantitative real-time PCR assay; expression of these and various neural lineage genes was evaluated for the same dogs by reverse transcription PCR assay. Percentages of cells expressing CD90, nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and tubulin β 3 class III (TUJ1) proteins were determined by flow cytometry for all dogs. The DNA copy number stability (in samples from 6 dogs) and neural cell differentiation (14 dogs) were assessed with array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis and immunocytochemical evaluation, respectively.

RESULTS ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs expressed neural cell progenitor and differentiation markers; GFAP and microtubule-associated protein 2 were expressed by ADSC-NSCs but not ADSCs. Relative gene expression of CD90 and nestin was subjectively higher in ADSC-NSCs than in ADSCs. Percentages of ADSC-NSCs expressing nestin, GFAP, and TUJ1 proteins were substantially higher than those of ADSCs. Cells expressing neuronal and glial markers were generated from ADSC-NSCs and had no DNA copy number instability detectable by the methods used.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested ADSCs can potentially be a safe and clinically relevant autologous source for canine neural progenitor cells. Further research is needed to verify these findings.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate gene expression and DNA copy number in adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) and in ADSC-derived neurosphere-like cell clusters (ADSC-NSCs) generated from tissues of chronically paraplegic dogs.

ANIMALS 14 client-owned paraplegic dogs.

PROCEDURES Dorsal subcutaneous adipose tissue (< 1 cm3) was collected under general anesthesia; ADSCs were isolated and cultured. Third-passage ADSCs were cultured in neural cell induction medium to generate ADSC-NSCs. Relative gene expression of mesenchymal cell surface marker CD90 and neural progenitor marker nestin was assessed in ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs from 3 dogs by quantitative real-time PCR assay; expression of these and various neural lineage genes was evaluated for the same dogs by reverse transcription PCR assay. Percentages of cells expressing CD90, nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and tubulin β 3 class III (TUJ1) proteins were determined by flow cytometry for all dogs. The DNA copy number stability (in samples from 6 dogs) and neural cell differentiation (14 dogs) were assessed with array-comparative genomic hybridization analysis and immunocytochemical evaluation, respectively.

RESULTS ADSCs and ADSC-NSCs expressed neural cell progenitor and differentiation markers; GFAP and microtubule-associated protein 2 were expressed by ADSC-NSCs but not ADSCs. Relative gene expression of CD90 and nestin was subjectively higher in ADSC-NSCs than in ADSCs. Percentages of ADSC-NSCs expressing nestin, GFAP, and TUJ1 proteins were substantially higher than those of ADSCs. Cells expressing neuronal and glial markers were generated from ADSC-NSCs and had no DNA copy number instability detectable by the methods used.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested ADSCs can potentially be a safe and clinically relevant autologous source for canine neural progenitor cells. Further research is needed to verify these findings.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 58 kb)
    • Supplementary Table 2 (PDF 57 kb)

Contributor Notes

Dr Lim's present address is Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

Dr Koh's present address is Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Address correspondence to Dr. Olby (Natasha_olby@ncsu.edu).
  • 1. Thuret S, Moon LD, Gage FH. Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7:628643.

  • 2. Kumar S, Chanda D, Ponnazhagan S. Therapeutic potential of genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells. Gene Ther 2008; 15:711715.

  • 3. Kim SU, de Vellis J. Stem cell-based cell therapy in neurological diseases: a review. J Neurosci Res 2009; 87:21832200.

  • 4. Marquis-Gravel G, Stevens LM, Mansour S, et al. Stem cell therapy for the treatment of nonischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30:13781384.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Cosson S, Otte EA, Hezaveh H, et al. Concise review: tailoring bioengineered scaffolds for stem cell applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Transl Med 2015; 4:156164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Aust L, Devlin B, Foster SJ, et al. Yield of human adipose-derived adult stem cells from liposuction aspirates. Cytotherapy 2004; 6:714.

  • 7. Schäffler A, Büchler C. Concise review: adipose tissue-derived stromal cells-basic and clinical implications for novel cell-based therapies. Stem Cells 2007; 25:818827.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284:143147.

  • 9. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, et al. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:42794295.

  • 10. Gimble J, Guilak F. Adipose-derived adult stem cells: isolation, characterization, and differentiation potential. Cytotherapy 2003; 5:362369.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Franco Lambert AP, Fraga Zandonai A, Bonatto D, et al. Differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells into neuronal tissue: does it work? Differentiation 2009; 77:221228.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Lim JH, Boozer L, Mariani CL, et al. Generation and characterization of neurospheres from canine adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. Cell Reprogram 2010; 12:417425.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Lees JS, Sena ES, Egan KJ, et al. Stem cell-based therapy for experimental stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 2012; 7:582588.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Banerjee S, Bentley P, Hamady M, et al. Intra-arterial immunoselected CD34+ stem cells for acute ischemic stroke. Stem Cells Transl Med 2014; 3:13221330.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Reeves A, Keirstead HS. Stem cell based strategies for spinal cord injury repair. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 760:1624.

  • 16. Dasari VR, Veeravalli KK, Dinh DH. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injuries: a review. World J Stem Cells 2014; 6:120133.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Marx C, Silveira MD, Beyer Nardi N. Adipose-derived stem cells in veterinary medicine: characterization and therapeutic applications. Stem Cells Dev 2015; 24:803813.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Park SS, Lee YJ, Lee SH, et al. Functional recovery after spinal cord injury in dogs treated with a combination of Matrigel and neural-induced adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy 2012; 14:584597.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Ryu HH, Kang BJ, Park SS, et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton's jelly, and umbilical cord blood for treating spinal cord injuries in dogs. J Vet Med Sci 2012; 74:16171630.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Thomas R, Demeter Z, Kennedy KA, et al. Integrated immunohistochemical and DNA copy number profiling analysis provides insight into the molecular pathogenesis of canine follicular lymphoma [published online ahead of print May 2, 2016]. Vet Comp Oncol doi: 10.1111/vco.12227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Lim JH, Koh S, Olby NJ, et al. Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from adult canine brains. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73:19631968.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Halme DG, Kessler DA. FDA regulation of stem-cell-based therapies. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:17301735.

  • 23. Fink DW Jr. FDA regulation of stem cell-based products. Science 2009 26;324:16621663.

  • 24. Hu BY, Weick JP, Yu J, et al. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:43354340.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Wilcox JT, Lai JK, Semple E, et al. Synaptically-competent neurons derived from canine embryonic stem cells by lineage selection with EGF and noggin. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e19768.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008; 3:11011108.

  • 27. Thomas R, Seiser EL, Motsinger-Reif A, et al. Refining tumor-associated aneuploidy through ‘genomic recoding’ of recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in 150 canine non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 52:13211335.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Chen WK, Swartz JD, Rush LJ, et al. Mapping DNA structural variation in dogs. Genome Res 2009; 19:500509.

  • 29. Nicholas TJ, Cheng Z, Ventura M, et al. The genomic architecture of segmental duplications and associated copy number variants in dogs. Genome Res 2009; 19:491499.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Koh S, Thomas R, Tsai S, et al. Growth requirements and chromosomal instability of induced pluripotent stem cells generated from adult canine fibroblasts. Stem Cells Dev 2013; 22:951963.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Hyun I, Lindvall O, Ahrlund-Richter L, et al. New ISSCR guidelines underscore major principles for responsible trans-lational stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 2008; 3:607609.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Sethe S, Scutt A, Stolzing A. Aging of mesenchymal stem cells. Ageing Res Rev 2006; 5:91116.

  • 33. Kim M, Kim C, Choi YS, et al. Age-related alterations in mesenchymal stem cells related to shift in differentiation from osteogenic to adipogenic potential: implication to age-associated bone diseases and defects. Mech Ageing Dev 2012; 133:215225.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Neupane M, Chang CC, Kiupel M, et al. Isolation and characterization of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2008; 14:10071015.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Kisiel AH, McDuffee LA, Masaoud E, et al. Isolation, characterization, and in vitro proliferation of canine mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, and periosteum. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73:13051317.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Guercio A, Di Bella S, Casella S, et al. Canine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): characterization in relation to donor age and adipose tissue-harvesting site. Cell Biol Int 2013; 37:789798.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Bunnell BA, Ylostalo J, Kang SK. Common transcriptional gene profile in neurospheres derived from pATSCs, pBMSCs, and pNSCs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 343:762771.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Wislet-Gendebien S, Leprince P, Moonen G, et al. Regulation of neural markers nestin and GFAP expression by cultivated bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:32953302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Deng W, Obrocka M, Fischer I, et al. In vitro differentiation of human marrow stromal cells into early progenitors of neural cells by conditions that increase intracellular cyclic AMP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 282:148152.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Morikawa S, Mabuchi Y, Niibe K, et al. Development of mesenchymal stem cells partially originate from the neural crest. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 379:11141119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Wislet-Gendebien S, Hans G, Leprince P, et al. Plasticity of cultured mesenchymal stem cells: switch from nestin-positive to excitable neuron-like phenotype. Stem Cells 2005; 23:392402.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Sauerzweig S, Munsch T, Lessmann V, et al. A population of serum deprivation-induced bone marrow stem cells (SD-BMSC) expresses marker typical for embryonic and neural stem cells. Exp Cell Res 2009; 315:5066.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Hermann A, Gastl R, Liebau S, et al. Efficient generation of neural stem cell-like cells from adult human bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:44114422.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. Hermann A, Liebau S, Gastl R, et al. Comparative analysis of neuroectodermal differentiation capacity of human bone marrow stromal cells using various conversion protocols. J Neurosci Res 2006; 83:15021514.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45. Harris VK, Faroqui R, Vyshkina T, et al. Characterization of autologous mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors as a feasible source of stem cells for central nervous system applications in multiple sclerosis. Stem Cells Transl Med 2012; 1:536547.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46. Rooney GE, Howard L, O'Brien T, et al. Elevation of cAMP in mesenchymal stem cells transiently upregulates neural markers rather than inducing neural differentiation. Stem Cells Dev 2009; 18:387398.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. He J, Liu Y, Zhu T, et al. CD90 is identified as a candidate marker for cancer stem cells in primary high-grade gliomas using tissue microarrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11:M111.010744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8:106118.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. Ben-David U, Benvenisty N. High prevalence of evolutionarily conserved and species-specific genomic aberrations in mouse pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012; 30:612622.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. Omeir R, Thomas R, Teferedegne B, et al. A novel canine kidney cell line model for the evaluation of neoplastic development: karyotype evolution associated with spontaneous immortalization and tumorigenicity. Chromosome Res 2015; 23:663680.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51. Osada N, Kohara A, Yamaji T, et al. The genome landscape of the African green monkey kidney-derived vero cell line. DNA Res 2014; 21:673683.

  • 52. Padilla-Nash HM, McNeil NE, Yi M, et al. Aneuploidy, oncogene amplification and epithelial to mesenchymal transition define spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 2013; 34:19291939.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53. Magdolen U, Schmitt M, Hildebrandt B, et al. Spontaneous in vitro transformation of primary human osteoblast-like cells. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2010; 7:6166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement