Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam after intramuscular and oral administration of a single dose to American flamingos (Phoenicopertus ruber)

Jennifer L. Boonstra Department of Veterinary Services, Potawatomi Zoo, South Bend, IN 46615.

Search for other papers by Jennifer L. Boonstra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPH
,
Sherry K. Cox Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Sherry K. Cox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Tomas Martin-Jimenez Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Tomas Martin-Jimenez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine pharmacokinetics after IM and oral administration of a single dose of meloxicam to American flamingos (Phoenicopertus ruber).

ANIMALS 14 adult flamingos.

PROCEDURES Flamingos were allocated to 2 groups. Each group received a dose of meloxicam (1 mg/kg) by the IM or oral route. After a 4-week washout period, groups received meloxicam via the other route of administration. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. Data for each bird were analyzed. Estimated values of selected pharmacokinetic parameters were compared by use of a linear mixed-effects ANOVA. Pooled concentration-time profiles for each route of administration were analyzed to examine the influence of body weight on pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS Mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration was 1.00 ± 0.88 μg/mL after oral administration. This was approximately 15% of the mean maximum plasma concentration of 5.50 ± 2.86 μg/mL after IM administration. Mean time to maximum plasma concentration was 1.33 ± 1.32 hours after oral administration and 0.28 ± 0.17 hours after IM administration. Mean half-life of the terminal phase after oral administration (3.83 ± 2.64 hours) was approximately twice that after IM administration (1.83 ± 1.22 hours).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that the extent and rate of meloxicam absorption were less after oral administration than after IM administration. Intramuscular administration resulted in a short period during which mean plasma concentrations met or exceeded reported efficacious analgesic concentrations in other species, whereas oral administration did not. These results suggested that higher doses may be required for oral administration.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine pharmacokinetics after IM and oral administration of a single dose of meloxicam to American flamingos (Phoenicopertus ruber).

ANIMALS 14 adult flamingos.

PROCEDURES Flamingos were allocated to 2 groups. Each group received a dose of meloxicam (1 mg/kg) by the IM or oral route. After a 4-week washout period, groups received meloxicam via the other route of administration. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. Data for each bird were analyzed. Estimated values of selected pharmacokinetic parameters were compared by use of a linear mixed-effects ANOVA. Pooled concentration-time profiles for each route of administration were analyzed to examine the influence of body weight on pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS Mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration was 1.00 ± 0.88 μg/mL after oral administration. This was approximately 15% of the mean maximum plasma concentration of 5.50 ± 2.86 μg/mL after IM administration. Mean time to maximum plasma concentration was 1.33 ± 1.32 hours after oral administration and 0.28 ± 0.17 hours after IM administration. Mean half-life of the terminal phase after oral administration (3.83 ± 2.64 hours) was approximately twice that after IM administration (1.83 ± 1.22 hours).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that the extent and rate of meloxicam absorption were less after oral administration than after IM administration. Intramuscular administration resulted in a short period during which mean plasma concentrations met or exceeded reported efficacious analgesic concentrations in other species, whereas oral administration did not. These results suggested that higher doses may be required for oral administration.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Boonstra's present address is Fox Valley Animal Hospital, 6115 Northwest Hwy, Crystal Lake, IL 60014.

Address correspondence to Dr. Boonstra (jenniferboonstra@yahoo.com).
  • 1. Nielsen AM, Nielsen SS, King CE, et al. Classification and prevalence of foot lesions in captive flamingos (Phoenicopteridae). J Zoo Wildl Med 2010; 41:4449.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Nielsen AM, Nielsen SS, King CE, et al. Risk factors for development of foot lesions in captive flamingos (Phoenicopteridae). J Zoo Wildl Med 2012; 43:744749.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Cole GA, Paul-Murphy J, Krugner-Higby L, et al. Analgesic effects of intramuscular administration of meloxicam in Hispaniolan parrots (Amazona ventralis) with experimentally induced arthritis. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70:14711476.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Molter CM, Court MH, Cole GA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration of a single dose to Hispaniolan Amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis). Am J Vet Res 2013; 74:375380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Mazario J, Rosa C, Herrero JE. The NSAID dexketoprofen trometamol is as potent as μ-opioids in the depression of wind-up and spinal cord nociceptive reflexes in normal rats. Brain Res 1999; 816:512517.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Urquhart E. Central analgesic activity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in animal and human pain models. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1993; 23:198205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Hawkins MG, Paul-Murphy J. Avian analgesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2011; 14:6180.

  • 8. Royal LW, Lascelles DX, Lewbart GA, et al. Evaluation of cyclooxygenase protein expression in traumatized versus normal tissues from Eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina). J Zoo Wildl Med 2012; 43:289295.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Desmarchelier M, Troncy E, Fitzgerald G, et al. Analgesic effects of meloxicam administration on postoperative orthopedic pain in domestic pigeons (Columba livia). Am J Vet Res 2012; 73:361367.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Paul-Murphy J, Ludders JW. Avian analgesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2001; 4:3545.

  • 11. Redig P. Falconiformes. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, eds. Zoo and wild animal medicine. St Louis: WB Saunders Co, 2003;150161.

  • 12. Samour J. Appendix 6: pharmaceutical products commonly used in avian medicine. In: Samour J, ed. Avian medicine. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2016;664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Bergh MS, Budsberg SC. The coxib NSAIDs: potential clinical and pharmacologic importance in veterinary medicine. J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19:633643.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Lacasse C, Gamble KC, Boothe DM. Pharmacokinetics of a single dose of intravenous and oral meloxicam in red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus). J Avian Med Surg 2013; 27:204210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Baert K, De Backer P. Comparative pharmacokinetics of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in five bird species. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2003; 134:2533.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Baert K, De Backer P. Disposition of sodium salicylate, flunix-in and meloxicam after intravenous administration in broiler chickens. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2002; 25:449453.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Wilson HG, Hernandez-Divers S, Budsberg SC, et al. Pharmacokinetics and use of meloxicam in psittacine birds, in Proceedings. Annu Conf Assoc Avian Vet 2004;79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Naidoo V, Wolter K, Cromart AD, et al. The pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in vultures. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008; 31:128134.

  • 19. Busch U, Schmid J, Heinzel G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in animals and the relevance to humans. Drug Metab Dispos 1998; 26:576584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Simeone CA, Nollens HH, Meegan JM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a single dose oral meloxicam in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncates). J Zoo Wildl Med 2014; 45:594599.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Lees P. Analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic drugs. In: Riviere JE, ed. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009;457492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Turck D, Busch U, Heinzel G, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of meloxicam. Eur J Rheumatol Inflamm 1995; 15:2234.

  • 23. Coetzee JF, KuKanich B, Mosher R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral meloxicam in ruminant calves. Vet Ther 2009; 10:E1E8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Toutain PL, Cester CC. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and dose response to meloxicam in horses with induced arthritis in the right carpal joint. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65:15331541.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement