Alterations in conjunctival bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility during topical administration of ofloxacin after cataract surgery in dogs

Lynne S. Sandmeyer Departments of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Lynne S. Sandmeyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Bianca S. Bauer Departments of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Bianca S. Bauer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MSc
,
Seyed Mohammad Mohaghegh Poor Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.

Search for other papers by Seyed Mohammad Mohaghegh Poor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Cindy Xin Feng Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Cindy Xin Feng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Manuel Chirino-Trejo Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Manuel Chirino-Trejo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in conjunctival bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria after cataract surgery in dogs.

ANIMALS 16 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES Samples for aerobic and anaerobic culture were obtained from the conjunctival fornices of both eyes of dogs 24 hours before (week 0) and 1, 3, and 6 weeks after cataract surgery. Topical administration of ofloxacin (every 6 hours) was initiated 12 hours before surgery and continued for 3 weeks. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and a commercially available test for ofloxacin.

RESULTS Frequency of positive culture results was significantly higher at week 6 than at weeks 0 and 1. Bacterial load was more likely to be moderate or high at weeks 3 and 6 than at weeks 0 and 1. The most frequently cultured organism was Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (21/78 [26.9%]), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (19/78 [24.4%]). Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was the organism most frequently cultured at weeks 0 (5/12), 1 (4/12), and 6 (8/19), whereas frequency of this organism was lowest at week 3 (1/20). In contrast, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp were the most frequently cultured organisms at week 3 (10/20). There was a significant increase in the proportion of organisms resistant to ofloxacin at week 3, compared with the proportion at week 0.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The number of bacterial organisms increased and the population of conjunctival bacteria was altered and had a higher proportion resistant to ofloxacin during the 6 weeks after cataract surgery for dogs treated by use of this protocol.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in conjunctival bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria after cataract surgery in dogs.

ANIMALS 16 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES Samples for aerobic and anaerobic culture were obtained from the conjunctival fornices of both eyes of dogs 24 hours before (week 0) and 1, 3, and 6 weeks after cataract surgery. Topical administration of ofloxacin (every 6 hours) was initiated 12 hours before surgery and continued for 3 weeks. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and a commercially available test for ofloxacin.

RESULTS Frequency of positive culture results was significantly higher at week 6 than at weeks 0 and 1. Bacterial load was more likely to be moderate or high at weeks 3 and 6 than at weeks 0 and 1. The most frequently cultured organism was Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (21/78 [26.9%]), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (19/78 [24.4%]). Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was the organism most frequently cultured at weeks 0 (5/12), 1 (4/12), and 6 (8/19), whereas frequency of this organism was lowest at week 3 (1/20). In contrast, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp were the most frequently cultured organisms at week 3 (10/20). There was a significant increase in the proportion of organisms resistant to ofloxacin at week 3, compared with the proportion at week 0.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The number of bacterial organisms increased and the population of conjunctival bacteria was altered and had a higher proportion resistant to ofloxacin during the 6 weeks after cataract surgery for dogs treated by use of this protocol.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Sandmeyer (lynne.sandmeyer@usask.ca).

Dr. Mohaghegh Poor's present address is Department of Radiation Oncology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada.

  • 1. Thangamuthu R, Varshney JP, Rathore BS. Conjunctival flora of clinically healthy and diseased eyes of dogs. Haryana Vet 2002; 41: 38–40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Teixeira AL, Maia FBN, Alvarenga LS, et al. Aerobic conjunctival flora of healthy dogs in Sao Paulo. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2006; 58: 1024–1029.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Urban M, Wyman M, Rheins M, et al. Conjunctival flora of clinically normal dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1972; 161: 201–206.

  • 4. McDonald PJ, Watson AD. Microbial flora of normal canine conjunctivae. J Small Anim Pract 1976; 17: 809–812.

  • 5. Varges R, Penna B, Martins G, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from naturally occurring canine external ocular diseases. Vet Ophthalmol 2009; 12: 216–220.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Furiani N, Scarampella F, Martino PA, et al. Evaluation of the bacterial microflora of the conjunctival sac of healthy dogs and dogs with atopic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol 2011; 22: 490–496.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Samuelson DA, Andresen TL, Gwin RM. Conjunctival fungal flora in horses, cattle, dogs, and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184: 1240–1242.

  • 8. Verneuil M, Durand B, Marcon C, et al. Conjunctival and cutaneous fungal flora in clinically normal dogs in Southern France. J Mycol Med 2014; 24: 25–28.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Moore DL, McLellan GJ, Dubielzig RR. A study of the morphology of canine eyes enucleated or eviscerated due to complications following phacoemulsification. Vet Ophthalmol 2003; 6: 219–226.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Ledbetter EC, Millichamp NJ, Dziezyc J. Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in dogs. Vet Ophthalmol 2004; 7: 327–334.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Speaker MG, Milch FA, Shah MK, et al. Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 639–649.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Taylor MM, Kern TJ, Riis RC, et al. Intraocular bacterial contamination during cataract surgery in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206: 1716–1720.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Roberts SM, Severin GA, Lavach JD. Antibacterial activity of dilute povidone-iodine solutions used for ocular surface disinfection in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47: 1207–1210.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Ciulla TA, Starr MB, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 13–26.

  • 15. Yu-Speight AW, Kern TJ, Erb HN. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin aqueous humor concentrations after topical administration in dogs undergoing cataract surgery. Vet Ophthalmol 2005; 8: 181–187.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Mamalis N. The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1831–1832.

  • 17. Karacal H, Kymes SM, Apte RS. Retrospective analysis of etiopathogenesis of all cases of endophthalmitis in a large tertiary referral center. Int Ophthalmol 2007; 27: 251–259.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Asbell PA, Sahm DF, Shaw M, et al. Increasing prevalence of methicillin resistance in serious ocular infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: 2000–2005. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34: 814–818.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Sotozono C, Fukuda M, Ohishi M, et al. Vancomycin ophthalmic ointment 1% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections: a case series. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e001206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Dave SB, Toma HS, Kim SJ. Ophthalmic antibiotic use and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. A controlled, longitudinal study. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2035–2040.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Olson R, Donnenfeld E, Bucci FA Jr, et al. Methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus species among health care and non-health care workers undergoing cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 1505–1514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Kleinfeld J, Ellis PP. Effects of topical anesthetics on growth of microorganisms. Arch Ophthalmol 1966; 76: 712–715.

  • 23. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. CLSI document VET-01S. 3rd ed. Wayne, Pa: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-fourth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, Pa: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Tolar EL, Hendrix DV, Rohrbach BW, et al. Evaluation of clinical characteristics and bacterial isolates in dogs with bacterial keratitis: 97 cases (1993–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228: 80–85.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Wang L, Pan Q, Zhang L, et al. Investigation of bacterial microorganisms in the conjunctival sac of clinically normal dogs and dogs with ulcerative keratitis in Beijing, China. Vet Ophthalmol 2008; 11: 145–149.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Gerding PA Jr, McLaughlin SA, Troop MW. Pathogenic bacteria and fungi associated with external ocular disease in dogs: 131 cases (1981–1986). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193: 242–244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Gemensky-Metzler AJ, Wilke DA, Kowalski JJ, et al. Changes in bacterial and fungal ocular flora of clinically normal horses following experimental application of topical antimicrobial or antimicrobial-corticosteroid ophthalmic preparations. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 800–811.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. McDonald M, Blondeau JM. Emerging antibiotic resistance in ocular infections and the role of fluoroquinolones. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1588–1598.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Blondeau JM. Fluoroquinolones: mechanism of action, classification, and development of resistance. Surv Ophthalmol 2004; 49(suppl 2): S73–S78.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Fintelmann RE, Hoskins MD, Leitman M, et al. Topical fluoroquinolone use as a risk factor for in vitro fluoroquinolone resistance in ocular cultures. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 399–402.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Kim SJ, Toma HS. Antimicrobial resistance and ophthalmic antibiotics: 1-year results of a longitudinal controlled study of patients undergoing intravitreal injections. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 1180–1188.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Milder E, Vander J, Shah C, et al. Changes in antibiotic resistance patterns of conjunctival flora due to repeated use of topical antibiotics after intravitreal injection. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1420–1424.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Dorrepaal SJ, Gale J, El-Defrqey S, et al. Resistance of ocular flora to gatifloxacin in patients undergoing intravitreal injections. Can J Ophthalmol 2014; 49: 66–71.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Blondeau JM, Hansen G, Metzler K, et al. The role of PK/PD parameters to avoid selection and increase of resistance: mutant prevention concentration. J Chemother 2004; 16(suppl 3): S1–S19.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Hwang DG. Fluoroquinolone resistance in ophthalmology and the potential role for newer ophthalmic fluoroquinolones. Surv Ophthalmol 2004; 49(suppl 2): S79–S83.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Pappa KS. Corticosteroid drugs. In: Mauger TF, Elson LC, eds. Havener's ocular pharmacology. 6th ed. Mosby Year Book Inc: St Louis, 1994;364–428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Ermis SS, Aktepe OC, Inan UU, et al. Effect of topical dexamethasone and ciprofloxacin on bacterial flora of healthy conjunctiva. Eye (Lond) 2004; 18: 249–252.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Klein HE, Krohne SG, Moore GE, et al. Postoperative complications and visual outcomes of phacoemulsification in 103 dogs (179 eyes): 2006–2008. Vet Ophthalmol 2011;14: 114–120.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Azoulay T, Dulaurent T, Isard PF, et al. Immediately sequential bacterial cataract surgery in dogs: a retrospective analysis of 128 cases (256 eyes) [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2013; 36: 645–651.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Sigle KJ, Nasisse MP. Long-term complications after phacoemulsification for cataract removal in dogs: 172 cases (1995–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 228: 74–79.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Ravindran RD, Venkatesh R, Chang DF, et al. Incidence of post-cataract endophthalmitis at Aravind Eye Hospital: outcomes of more than 42,000 consecutive cases using standard sterilization and prophylaxis protocols. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 629–636.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Bannerman TL, Rhoden DL, McAllister SK, et al. The source of coagulase-negative staphylococci in endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: a comparison of eyelid and intraocular isolates using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 357–361.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. Oguz H, Satici A, Guzey M, et al. Microbiological analysis of aqueous humor in phacoemulsification. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999; 43: 162–165.

  • 45. Driebe WT Jr, Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, et al. Pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Diagnosis and management. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 442–448.

  • 46. Weber DJ, Hoffman KL, Thoft RA, et al. Endophthalmitis following intraocular lens implantation. Report of 30 cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 1986; 8: 12–20.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (Erratum published in Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 122:920). Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122: 1–17.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. Miller DM, Vedula AS, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis: in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2007; 38: 446–451.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. Miller D, Flynn PM, Scott IU, et al. In vitro fluoroquinolone resistance in staphylococcal endophthalmitis isolates. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 479–483.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. Kaliamurthy J, Jesudasan CAN, Geraldine P, et al. Comparison of in vitro susceptibilities of ocular bacterial isolates to gatifloxacin and other topical antibiotics. Ophthalmic Res 2005; 37: 117–122.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51. Parmar P, Salman A, Kalavathy CM, et al. Comparison of topical gatifloxacin 0.3% and ciprofloxacin 0.3% for the treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 282–286.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement