Endothelial protein C receptor–dependent antichemotactic effects of canine protein C

Valerie M. Wong Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON NIG 2WI, Canada.

Search for other papers by Valerie M. Wong in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Olivier Côté Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON NIG 2WI, Canada.

Search for other papers by Olivier Côté in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Dorothee Bienzle Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON NIG 2WI, Canada.

Search for other papers by Dorothee Bienzle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
M. Anthony Hayes Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON NIG 2WI, Canada.

Search for other papers by M. Anthony Hayes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
, and
R. Darren Wood Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON NIG 2WI, Canada.

Search for other papers by R. Darren Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DVSc
Restricted access
Purchase Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether canine protein C (CnPC) had antichemotactic effects on canine neutrophils, whether endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) was expressed on canine neutrophils, and the role of EPCR in neutrophil chemotaxis.

SAMPLE Neutrophils isolated from blood samples from healthy dogs (n = 6) and sick dogs with (2) or without (3) an inflammatory leukogram.

PROCEDURES Neutrophils were analyzed by reverse transcriptase PCR assay and flow cytometry for detection of EPCR mRNA and protein expression, respectively. Neutrophils were incubated with CnPC zymogen or canine activated protein C (CnAPC), with or without RCR-379 (an anti–human EPCR antibody). Neutrophils were then allowed to migrate through a filter membrane toward a chemokine. Untreated neutrophils served as positive control samples. Migration was quantified by fluorescence measurement, and chemotaxis index (Chx) values (fluorescence of test sample/fluorescence of positive control sample) were computed.

RESULTS The cDNA for EPCR was amplified, and EPCR expression was detected on neutrophil surfaces. Obtained Chx values were significantly higher in cells treated with RCR-379 than in cells treated with CnPC or CnAPC alone. The Chx values for neutrophils treated with RCR-379 were not significantly different from 1, whereas those for neutrophils treated without RCR-379 were significantly less than 1. The effects of RCR-379 on neutrophil migration were independent of concentration or activation status of protein C.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Canine neutrophils expressed EPCR, and inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis by CnPC and CnAPC depended on EPCR. Interventions with EPCR signaling may have therapeutic application in dogs.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 52 0 0
Full Text Views 1006 681 120
PDF Downloads 176 60 2
Advertisement