Effects of prophylactic incisional gastropexy on markers of gastric motility in dogs as determined by use of a novel wireless motility device

Krista M. Gazzola Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Krista M. Gazzola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Laura L. Nelson Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Laura L. Nelson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Michele C. Fritz Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Michele C. Fritz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Michelle R. Clancy Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Michelle R. Clancy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS, MPA
, and
Joe G. Hauptman Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Joe G. Hauptman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of laparoscopic-assisted incisional gastropexy (LAIG) on gastric motility in dogs by use of a wireless motility device (WMD).

ANIMALS

10 healthy client-owned large or giant-breed dogs.

PROCEDURES

10 dogs owned by clients interested in prophylactic LAIG were enrolled. To determine effects of LAIG on gastrointestinal motility in dogs during the nonfed state, each dog was evaluated by use of a noninvasive WMD before and > 4 weeks after LAIG. All dogs underwent LAIG, with or without concurrent elective gonadectomy. Data obtained before and after LAIG were analyzed by use of proprietary software to determine the gastric emptying time, small bowel transit time, large bowel transit time, whole bowel transit time, and motility index.

RESULTS

No changes in variables were detected between measurements obtained before and after prophylactic LAIG.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, prophylactic LAIG did not have an effect on gastrointestinal motility. The WMD was tolerated well by all dogs and appeared to be a safe and effective method for evaluating gastrointestinal motility in this population of dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of laparoscopic-assisted incisional gastropexy (LAIG) on gastric motility in dogs by use of a wireless motility device (WMD).

ANIMALS

10 healthy client-owned large or giant-breed dogs.

PROCEDURES

10 dogs owned by clients interested in prophylactic LAIG were enrolled. To determine effects of LAIG on gastrointestinal motility in dogs during the nonfed state, each dog was evaluated by use of a noninvasive WMD before and > 4 weeks after LAIG. All dogs underwent LAIG, with or without concurrent elective gonadectomy. Data obtained before and after LAIG were analyzed by use of proprietary software to determine the gastric emptying time, small bowel transit time, large bowel transit time, whole bowel transit time, and motility index.

RESULTS

No changes in variables were detected between measurements obtained before and after prophylactic LAIG.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this study, prophylactic LAIG did not have an effect on gastrointestinal motility. The WMD was tolerated well by all dogs and appeared to be a safe and effective method for evaluating gastrointestinal motility in this population of dogs.

  • 1. Benitez ME, Schmiedt CW, Radlinsky MG, et al. Efficacy of incisional gastropexy for the prevention of GDV in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2013;49: 185189.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Eggertsdóttir AV, Stigen O, Lonaas L, et al. Comparison of the recurrence rate of gastric dilatation with or without volvulus in dogs after circumcostal gastropexy versus gastrocolopexy. Vet Surg 2001;30: 546551.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Hall JA, Solie TN, Seim HB III, et al. Gastric myoelectric and motor activity in dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus. Am J Physiol 1993;265: G646G653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Hall JA, Solie TN, Seim HB III, et al. Effect of acute gastric dilatation on gastric myoelectric and motor activity in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999;60: 597602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Hall JA, Willer RL, Seim HB III, et al. Gastric emptying of nondigestible radiopaque markers after circumcostal gastropexy in clinically normal dogs and dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus. Am J Vet Res 1992;53: 19611965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Ward MP, Patronek GJ, Glickman LT. Benefits of prophylactic gastropexy for dogs at risk of gastric dilatation-volvulus. Prev Vet Med 2003;60: 319329.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Monnet E. Gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003;33: 9871005 (vi).

  • 8. Cornell K. Chapter 91: stomach. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, eds. Veterinary surgery: small animal. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2012; 14841512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Woolfson J, Kostolich M. Circumcostal gastropexy: clinical use of the technique in 34 dogs with gastric dilatation-volvulus. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986;22: 825830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Fallah A, Lumb W, Nelson A, et al. Circumcostal gastropexy in the dog: a preliminary study. Vet Surg 1982;11: 912.

  • 11. Leib MS, Konde LJ, Wingfield WE, et al. Circumcostal gastropexy for preventing recurrence of gastric dilatation-volvulus in the dog: an evaluation of 30 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;187: 245248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Fox S, Ellison G, Miller G. Observations on the mechanical failure of three gastropexy techniques. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1985;21: 729734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Takahashi T. Mechanisms of interdigestive migrating motor complex. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012;18: 246257.

  • 14. Wyse CA, McLellan J, Dickie AM, et al. A review of methods for assessment of gastric empyting in the dog and cat: 1989–2002. J Vet Intern Med 2003;17: 609621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Hall JA, Willer RL, Solie TN, et al. Effect of circumcostal gastropexy on gastric myoelectric and motor activity in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1997;38: 200207.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Funkquist B, Garmer L. Pathogenic and therapeutic aspects of torsion of the canine stomach. J Small Anim Pract 1967;8: 523532.

  • 17. Boillat CS, Gaschen FP, Hosgood GL. Assessment of the relationship between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times measured by use of a wireless motility capsule system in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2010;71: 898902.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Boillat CS, Gaschen FP, Gaschen L, et al. Variability associated with repeated measurements of gastrointestinal tract motility in dogs obtained by use of a wireless motility capsule system and scintigraphy. Am J Vet Res 2010;71: 903908.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Saad RJ, Hasler WL. A technical review and clinical assessment of the wireless motility capsule. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2011;7: 795804.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Tran K, Brun R, Kuo B. Evaluation of regional and whole gut motility using the wireless motility capsule: relevance in clinical practice. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2012;5: 249260.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Mathon DH, Dossin O, Palierne S, et al. A laparoscopic-sutured gastropexy technique in dogs: mechanical and functional evaluation. Vet Surg 2009;38: 967974.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Kelly KA. Gastric emptying of liquids and solids: rates of proximal distal stomach. Am J Physiol 1980;239: G71G76.

  • 23. Stemper TJ, Cooke AR. Effect of a fixed pyloric opening on gastric emptying in the cat and dog. Am J Physiol 1976;230: 813817.

  • 24. Itoh Z, Takeuchi S, Aizawa I, et al. Changes in plasma motilin concentration and gastrointestinal contractile activity in conscious dogs. Am J Dig Dis 1978;23: 929935.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Sagawa K, Li F, Liese R, et al. Fed and fasted gastric pH and gastric residence time in conscious Beagle dogs. J Pharm Sci 2009;98: 24942500.

  • 26. Chandler ML. Nutritional strategies in gastrointestinal disease. In: Washabau RJ, Day MJ, eds. Canine and feline gastroenterology. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2013; 409415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Price JMC, Davis SS, Wilding IR. Characterization of colonic transit of nondisintegrating tablets in healthy subjects. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38: 10151021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement