Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after intravenous and oral administration to healthy cats

Polina Vishkautsan Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by Polina Vishkautsan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Mark G. Papich Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Mark G. Papich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
,
George R. Thompson III Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by George R. Thompson III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, MD
, and
Jane E. Sykes Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by Jane E. Sykes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD, DVM

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after voriconazole administration to cats and identify an oral dose of voriconazole for cats that maintains plasma drug concentrations within a safe and effective range.

ANIMALS 6 healthy cats.

PROCEDURES Voriconazole (1 mg/kg, IV) was administered to each cat (phase 1). Serial plasma voriconazole concentrations were measured for 24 hours after administration. Voriconazole suspension or tablets were administered orally at 4, 5, or 6 mg/kg (phase 2). Plasma voriconazole concentrations were measured for 24 hours after administration. Pharmacokinetics of tablet and suspension preparations was compared. Finally, an induction dose of 25 mg/cat (4.1 to 5.4 mg/kg, tablet formulation), PO, was administered followed by 12.5 mg/cat (2.05 to 2.7 mg/kg), PO, every 48 hours for 14 days (phase 3). Plasma voriconazole concentration was measured on days 2, 4, 8, and 15.

RESULTS Voriconazole half-life after IV administration was approximately 12 hours. Maximal plasma concentration was reached within 60 minutes after oral administration. A dose of 4 mg/kg resulted in plasma concentrations within the target range (1 to 4 μg/mL). Adverse effects included hypersalivation and miosis. During long-term administration, plasma concentrations remained in the target range but increased, which suggested drug accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Voriconazole had excellent oral bioavailability and a long half-life in cats. Oral administration of a dose of 12.5 mg/cat every 72 hours should be investigated. Miosis occurred when plasma concentrations reached the high end of the target range. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered to minimize adverse effects.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine pharmacokinetics and adverse effects after voriconazole administration to cats and identify an oral dose of voriconazole for cats that maintains plasma drug concentrations within a safe and effective range.

ANIMALS 6 healthy cats.

PROCEDURES Voriconazole (1 mg/kg, IV) was administered to each cat (phase 1). Serial plasma voriconazole concentrations were measured for 24 hours after administration. Voriconazole suspension or tablets were administered orally at 4, 5, or 6 mg/kg (phase 2). Plasma voriconazole concentrations were measured for 24 hours after administration. Pharmacokinetics of tablet and suspension preparations was compared. Finally, an induction dose of 25 mg/cat (4.1 to 5.4 mg/kg, tablet formulation), PO, was administered followed by 12.5 mg/cat (2.05 to 2.7 mg/kg), PO, every 48 hours for 14 days (phase 3). Plasma voriconazole concentration was measured on days 2, 4, 8, and 15.

RESULTS Voriconazole half-life after IV administration was approximately 12 hours. Maximal plasma concentration was reached within 60 minutes after oral administration. A dose of 4 mg/kg resulted in plasma concentrations within the target range (1 to 4 μg/mL). Adverse effects included hypersalivation and miosis. During long-term administration, plasma concentrations remained in the target range but increased, which suggested drug accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Voriconazole had excellent oral bioavailability and a long half-life in cats. Oral administration of a dose of 12.5 mg/cat every 72 hours should be investigated. Miosis occurred when plasma concentrations reached the high end of the target range. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered to minimize adverse effects.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Sykes (jesykes@ucdavis.edu).
  • 1. Middleton SM, Kubier A, Dirikolu L, et al. Alternate-day dosing of itraconazole in healthy adult cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2016; 39: 2731.

  • 2. Mikulska M, Novelli A, Aversa F, et al. Voriconazole in clinical practice. J Chemother 2012; 24: 311327.

  • 3. Scott LJ, Simpson D. Voriconazole: a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections. Drugs 2007; 67: 269298.

  • 4. Owusu Obeng A, Egelund EF, Alsultan A, et al. CYP2C19 polymorphisms and therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: are we ready for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics? Pharmacotherapy 2014; 34: 703718.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Okabayashi K, Imaji M, Osumi T, et al. Antifungal activity of itraconazole and voriconazole against clinical isolates obtained from animals with mycoses. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2009; 50: 9194.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Lat A, Thompson GR III. Update on the optimal use of voriconazole for invasive fungal infections. Infect Drug Resist 2011; 4: 4353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Smith LN, Hoffman SB. A case series of unilateral orbital aspergillosis in three cats and treatment with voriconazole. Vet Ophthalmol 2010; 13: 190203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Barrs VR, Halliday C, Martin P, et al. Sinonasal and sino-orbital aspergillosis in 23 cats: aetiology, clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. Vet J 2012; 191: 5864.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Quimby JM, Hoffman SB, Duke J, et al. Adverse neurologic events associated with voriconazole use in 3 cats. J Vet Intern Med 2010; 24: 647649.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Kano R, Kitagawat M, Oota S, et al. First case of feline systemic Cryptococcus albidus infection. Med Mycol 2008; 46: 7577.

  • 11. Goodwin ML, Drew RH. Antifungal serum concentration monitoring: an update. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61: 1725.

  • 12. Roffey SJ, Cole S, Comby P, et al. The disposition of voriconazole in mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, dog, and human. Drug Metab Dispos 2003; 31: 731741.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Davis JL, Salmon JH, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after oral and intravenous administration to horses. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 10701075.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Chan HM, Duran SH, Walz PH, et al. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after single dose intravenous and oral administration to alpacas. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2009; 32: 235240.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Sanchez-Migallon Guzman D, Flammer K, Papich MG, et al. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after oral administration of single and multiple doses in Hispaniolan Amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis). Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 460467.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Hsu AJ, Dabb A, Arav-Boger R. Autoinduction of voriconazole metabolism in a child with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Pharmacotherapy 2015; 35: e20e26.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Mulanovich V, Lewis RE, Raad II, et al. Random plasma concentrations of voriconazole decline over time. J Infect 2007; 55: e129e130.

  • 18. Moriyama B, Elinoff J, Danner RL, et al. Accelerated metabolism of voriconazole and its partial reversal by cimetidine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 17121714.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69: 11621176.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Lemetayer JD, Dowling PM, Taylor SM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and distribution of voriconazole in body fluids of dogs after repeated oral dosing. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2015; 38: 451456.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 30-NF 25). Vol 2. Rockville, Md: United States Pharmacopeia Convention, 2007;1553–1554.

  • 22. ICH. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1), in Proceedings. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceutical for human use, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T. Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1978; 6: 165175.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Perrier D, Gibaldi M. General derivation of the equation for time to reach a certain fraction of steady state. J Pharm Sci 1982; 71: 474475.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Yáñez JA, Remsberg CM, Sayre CL, et al. Flip-flop pharmacokinetics—delivering a reversal of disposition: challenges and opportunities during drug development. Ther Deliv 2011; 2: 643672.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Court MH. Canine cytochrome P-450 pharmacogenetics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2013; 43: 10271038.

  • 27. Pascual A, Calandra T, Bolay S, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 201211.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Smith J, Safdar N, Knasinski V, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 15701572.

  • 29. Eiden C, Peyrière H, Cociglio M, et al. Adverse effects of voriconazole: analysis of the French Pharmacovigilance Database. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41: 755763.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Taxvig C, Vinggaard AM, Hass U, et al. Endocrine-disrupting properties in vivo of widely used azole fungicides. Int J Androl 2008; 31: 170177.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Theuretzbacher U, Ihle F, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of voriconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet 2006; 45: 649663.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Zrenner E, Tomaszewski K, Hamlin J, et al. Effects of multiple doses of voriconazole on the vision of healthy volunteers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ophthalmic Res 2014; 52: 4352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Aksoy F, Akdogan E, Aydin K, et al. Voriconazole-induced neuropathy. Chemotherapy 2008; 54: 224227.

  • 34. Tsiodras S, Zafiropoulou R, Kanta E, et al. Painful peripheral neuropathy associated with voriconazole use. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 144146.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Zonios DI, Gea-Banacloche J, Childs R, et al. Hallucinations during voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: e7e10.

Advertisement