• 1. Arzi B, Verstraete FJ. Mandibular rim excision in seven dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 226231.

  • 2. Bar-Am Y, Verstraete FJ. Elastic training for the prevention of mandibular drift following mandibulectomy in dogs: 18 cases (2005–2008). Vet Surg 2010; 39: 574580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Boudrieau RJ. Maxillofacial fracture repair using miniplates and screws. In: Verstraete FJM, Lommer MJ, eds. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier, 2012; 293308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Boudrieau RJ, Kudisch M. Miniplate fixation for repair of mandibular and maxillary fractures in 15 dogs and 3 cats. Vet Surg 1996; 25: 277291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Verstraete FJ. Mandibulectomy and maxillectomy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2005; 35: 10091039.

  • 6. Arzi B, Verstraete FJ, Huey DJ, et al. Regenerating mandibular bone using rhBMP-2: part 1—immediate reconstruction of segmental mandibulectomies. Vet Surg 2015; 44: 403409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Uhl JM, Seguin B, Kapatkin AS, et al. Mechanical comparison of 3.5 mm broad dynamic compression plate, broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and narrow locking compression plate systems using interfragmentary gap models. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 663673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Boudrieau RJ, Mitchell SL, Seeherman H. Mandibular reconstruction of a partial hemimandibulectomy in a dog with severe malocclusion. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 119130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Lewis JR, Boudrieau RJ, Reiter AM, et al. Mandibular reconstruction after gunshot trauma in a dog by use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 15981604.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Verstraete FJ, Ligthelm AJ. Dental trauma caused by screws in internal fixation of mandibular osteotomies in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992; 5: 104108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Champy M, Lodde JP. Mandibular synthesis. Placement of the synthesis as a function of mandibular stress [in French]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1976; 77: 971976.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Champy M, Lodde JP, Grasset D, et al. Mandibular osteosynthesis and compression [in French]. Ann Chir Plast 1977; 22: 165167.

  • 13. Champy M, Lodde JP, Muster D, et al. Osteosynthesis using miniaturized screws on plates in facial and cranial surgery. Indications and results in 400 cases [in French]. Ann Chir Plast 1977; 22: 261264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Champy M, Lodde JP. Study of stresses in the fractured mandible in man. Theoretical measurement and verification by extensometric gauges in situ [in French]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1977; 78: 545551.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Champy M, Lodde JP, Schmitt R, et al. Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 1978; 6: 1421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Madsen MJ, Haug RH. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 457465.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Madsen MJ, McDaniel CA, Haug RH. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 20122019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Pereira-Filho VA, da Silva BN, Nunes Reis JM, et al. Effect of the number of screws on the stability of locking mandibular reconstruction plates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42: 732735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Spector DI, Keating JH, Boudrieau RJ. Immediate mandibular reconstruction of a 5 cm defect using rhBMP-2 after partial mandibulectomy in a dog. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 752759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Verstraete FJ, Arzi B, Huey DJ, et al. Regenerating mandibular bone using rhBMP-2: part 2—treatment of chronic, defect non-union fractures. Vet Surg 2015; 44: 410416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Brisceno CE, Rossouw PE, Carrillo R, et al. Healing of the roots and surrounding structures after intentional damage with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 292301.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Fabbroni G, Aabed S, Mizen K, et al. Transalveolar screws and the incidence of dental damage: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33: 442446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Renjen R, Maganzini AL, Rohrer MD, et al. Root and pulp response after intentional injury from miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 708714.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Bourke J, Wroe S, Moreno K, et al. Effects of gape and tooth position on bite force and skull stress in the dingo (Canis lupus dingo) using a 3-dimensional finite element approach. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e2200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Lindner DL, Marretta SM, Pijanowski GJ, et al. Measurement of bite force in dogs: a pilot study. J Vet Dent 1995; 12: 4952.

  • 26. Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; 138: 175196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, et al. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42: 855862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Boudrieau RJ. Initial experience with rhBMP-2 delivered in a compressive resistant matrix for mandibular reconstruction in 5 dogs. Vet Surg 2015; 44: 443458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Gellrich NC, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Otero-Cepeda XL, et al. Comparative study of locking plates in mandibular reconstruction after ablative tumor surgery: THORP versus UniLOCK system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 186193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Knott PD, Suh JD, Nabili V, et al. Evaluation of hardware-related complications in vascularized bone grafts with locking mandibular reconstruction plate fixation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133: 13021306.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Onoda S, Kimata Y, Yamada K, et al. Prevention points for plate exposure in the mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40: e310e314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Regev E, Shiff JS, Kiss A, et al. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 17531760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Farwell DG, Kezirian EJ, Heydt JL, et al. Efficacy of small reconstruction plates in vascularized bone graft mandibular reconstruction. Head Neck 2006; 28: 573579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Arzi B, Verstraete FJ. Clinical staging and biopsy of maxillofacial tumors. In: Verstraete FJM, Lommer MJ, eds. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier, 2012; 373380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Biomechanical evaluation of two plating configurations for critical-sized defects of the mandible in dogs

Boaz Arzi DVM1,2, Susan M. Stover DVM, PhD3,4, Tanya C. Garcia MS5, Dustin M. Leale BS6, and Frank J. M. Verstraete Dr Med Vet, M Med Vet7
View More View Less
  • 1 J.D. Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 2 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 3 J.D. Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 4 Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 5 J.D. Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 6 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
  • | 7 Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the biomechanical behavior of mandibular critical-sized defects stabilized with 2 plating configurations under in vitro conditions resembling clinical situations.

SAMPLE 24 mandibles harvested from 12 adult canine cadavers.

PROCEDURES 8 mandibles were kept intact as control samples. A critical-sized defect was created in 16 mandibles; these mandibles were stabilized by use of a single locking plate (LP [n = 8]) or an LP combined with an alveolar miniplate (LMP [8]). Mandibles were loaded in cantilever bending in a single-load-to-failure test with simultaneous recording of load and actuator displacement. Stiffness, yield, and failure properties were compared among groups. Mode of failure was recorded. Radiographic evidence of tooth root and mandibular canal damage was quantified and compared between groups.

RESULTS Stiffness and yield loads of single LP and LMP constructs were < 30% of values for intact mandibles, and failure loads were < 45% of values for intact mandibles. There were no consistent biomechanical differences at failure between single LP and LMP constructs, but the LMP construct had greater stiffness and strength prior to yield. Frequency of screw penetration of teeth and the mandibular canal was significantly greater for LMP than for single LP constructs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Both fixation methods were mechanically inferior to an intact mandible. The LMP construct was mechanically stronger than the LP construct but may not be clinically justifiable. Addition of an alveolar miniplate provided additional strength to the construct but resulted in more frequent penetration of tooth roots and the mandibular canal.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Arzi (barzi@ucdavis.edu).