Characterization of discrete equine intestinal epithelial cell lineages

Liara M. Gonzalez Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27502.

Search for other papers by Liara M. Gonzalez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Leslie A. Kinnin Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27502.

Search for other papers by Leslie A. Kinnin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Anthony T. Blikslager Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27502.

Search for other papers by Anthony T. Blikslager in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To characterize epithelial cells of the small intestine and colon in horses without clinical gastrointestinal abnormalities with an emphasis on the stem cell niche constituents.

SAMPLE Mucosal biopsy specimens from small and large intestines obtained from 12 horses euthanized for reasons unrelated to gastrointestinal disease or systemic disease.

PROCEDURES Intestinal biopsy specimens were collected by sharp dissection immediately following euthanasia. Specimens were prepared for immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence, and transmission electron microscopic imaging to detect and characterize each epithelial cell type. Antibodies against protein biomarkers for cellular identification were selected on the basis of expression in other mammalian species.

RESULTS Intestinal epithelial cell types were identified by means of immunostaining and morphological characterization with transmission electron microscopy. Some differences in biomarker expression and antibody cross-reactivity were identified in equine tissue, compared with other species. However, each known type of mucosal epithelial cell was identified in equine tissue.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The methodology used can enhance detection of stem cells and progenitor cells as well as postmitotic cell lineages in equine intestinal tissues. Results may have relevance to regenerative potential of intestinal mucosa and survival in horses with colic.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To characterize epithelial cells of the small intestine and colon in horses without clinical gastrointestinal abnormalities with an emphasis on the stem cell niche constituents.

SAMPLE Mucosal biopsy specimens from small and large intestines obtained from 12 horses euthanized for reasons unrelated to gastrointestinal disease or systemic disease.

PROCEDURES Intestinal biopsy specimens were collected by sharp dissection immediately following euthanasia. Specimens were prepared for immunohistochemical, immunofluorescence, and transmission electron microscopic imaging to detect and characterize each epithelial cell type. Antibodies against protein biomarkers for cellular identification were selected on the basis of expression in other mammalian species.

RESULTS Intestinal epithelial cell types were identified by means of immunostaining and morphological characterization with transmission electron microscopy. Some differences in biomarker expression and antibody cross-reactivity were identified in equine tissue, compared with other species. However, each known type of mucosal epithelial cell was identified in equine tissue.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The methodology used can enhance detection of stem cells and progenitor cells as well as postmitotic cell lineages in equine intestinal tissues. Results may have relevance to regenerative potential of intestinal mucosa and survival in horses with colic.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Gonzalez (lmgonza4@ncsu.edu).
  • 1. USDA APHIS Veterinary Services Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health. Part I: baseline reference of equine health and management. Fort Collins, Colo: USDA, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Dellmann H. Textbook of veterinary histology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1987.

  • 3. Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995; 16: 351–380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. I. Columnar cell. Am J Anat 1974; 141: 461–479.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Van Hoogmoed L, Snyder JR, Pascoe JR, et al. Use of pelvic flexure biopsies to predict survival after large colon torsion in horses. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 572–577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 2007; 449: 1003–1007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Gonzalez LM, Williamson I, Piedrahita JA, et al. Cell lineage identification and stem cell culture in a porcine model for the study of intestinal epithelial regeneration. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e66465.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Gracz AD, Fuller MK, Wang F, et al. CD24 and CD44 mark human intestinal epithelial cell populations with characteristics of active and facultative stem cells. Stem Cells 2013; 31: 2024–2030.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Foster DM, Stauffer SH, Stone MR, et al. Proteasome inhibition of pathologic shedding of enterocytes to defend barrier function requires X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein and nuclear factor kappa B. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 133–144.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Ahlman H, Nilsson O. The gut as the largest endocrine organ. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: S63–S68.

  • 11. Trzpis M, McLaughlin PM, de Leij LM, et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: more than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. Am J Pathol 2007; 171: 386–395.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Rodriguez IR, Taravel FR, Whelan WJ. Characterization and function of pig intestinal sucrase-isomaltase and its separate subunits. Eur J Biochem 1984; 143: 575–582.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Amasaki T, Amasaki H, Nagasao J, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes in salivary gland and intestine in adult and suckling pigs. J Vet Med Sci 2001; 63: 967–970.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Rothenberg ME, Nusse Y, Kalisky T, et al. Identification of a ckit+ colonic crypt base secretory cell that supports Lgr5+ stem cells in mice. Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 1195–1205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Sato T, van Es JH, Snippert HJ, et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 2011; 469: 415–418.

  • 16. Wong VW, Stange DE, Page ME, et al. Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14: 401–408.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Lin SA, Barker N. Gastrointestinal stem cells in self-renewal and cancer. J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 1039–1055.

  • 18. Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Lahm T, et al. Stem cells as a potential future treatment of pediatric intestinal disorders. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 1953–1963.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Krenacs L, Krenacs T, Stekovics E, et al. Heat-induced antigen retrieval for immunohistochemical reactions in routinely processed paraffin sections. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 588: 103–119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am J Anat 1974; 141: 537–561.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. West AB, Isaac CA, Carboni JM, et al. Localization of villin, a cytoskeletal protein specific to microvilli, in human ileum and colon and in colonic neoplasms. Gastroenterology 1988; 94: 343–352.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Formeister EJ, Sionas AL, Lorance DK, et al. Distinct SOX9 levels differentially mark stem/progenitor populations and enteroendocrine cells of the small intestine epithelium. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2009; 296: G1108–G1118.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Bjerknes M, Cheng H. Neurogenin 3 and the enteroendocrine cell lineage in the adult mouse small intestinal epithelium. Dev Biol 2006; 300: 722–735.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Dykstra MJ. Biological electron microscopy: theory, techniques, and troubleshooting. 2nd ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Cheng H. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. IV. Paneth cells. Am J Anat 1974; 141: 521–535.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Goodison S, Urquidi V, Train D. CD44 cell adhesion molecule. Mol Pathol 1999; 52: 18–96.

  • 27. Pinto D, Gregorieff A, Begthel H, et al. Canonical wnt signals are essential for homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium. Genes Dev 2003; 17: 1709–1713.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Rowe EL, White NA, Buechner-Maxwell V, et al. Detection of apoptotic cells in intestines from horses with and without gastrointestinal tract disease. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 982–988.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Johansson ME, Sjovall H, Hansson GC. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 10: 352–361.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Satoh Y, Yamano M, Matsuda M, et al. Ultrastructure of paneth cells in the intestine of various mammals. J Electron Microsc Tech 1990; 16: 69–80.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Clevers HC, Bevins CL. Paneth cells: maestros of the small intestinal crypts. Annu Rev Physiol 2013; 75: 289–311.

Advertisement