Application of in vivo microdialysis for investigation of unbound drug concentrations of intravenously administered sulfadimidine in the paranasal sinus mucosa of horses

Astrid Bienert-Zeit Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Astrid Bienert-Zeit in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Caroline Gietz Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Caroline Gietz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Carsten Staszyk Institute for Anatomy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Carsten Staszyk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Manfred Kietzmann Institute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Manfred Kietzmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jessica Stahl Institute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Jessica Stahl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Bernhard Ohnesorge Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Bernhard Ohnesorge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To monitor concentrations of sulfadimidine in the paranasal sinus mucosa (PSM) of unsedated horses following IV administration of trimethoprim-sulfadimidine via in vivo microdialysis.

ANIMALS 10 healthy adult horses.

PROCEDURES Concentric microdialysis probes were implanted into the subepithelial layers of the frontal sinus mucosa of standing sedated horses. Four hours after implantation, trimethoprim-sulfadimidine (30 mg/kg) was administered IV every 24 hours for 2 days; dialysate and plasma samples were collected at intervals during that 48-hour period and analyzed for concentrations of sulfadimidine. The dialysate concentration and relative loss of sulfadimidine from the perfusate were used to calculate the PSM concentration.

RESULTS Microdialysis probe implantation and subsequent in vivo microdialysis were successfully performed for all 10 horses. Following the first and second administration of trimethoprim-sulfadimidine, mean ± SD peak concentrations of sulfadimidine were 55.3 ± 10.3 μg/mL and 51.5 ± 8.7 μg/mL, respectively, in plasma and 9.6 ± 4.5 μg/mL and 7.0 ± 3.3 μg/mL, respectively, in the PSM. Peak sulfadimidine concentrations in the PSM were detected at 5.9 ± 2.7 hours and 5.4 ± 2.3 hours following the first and second drug administrations, respectively. For 12 hours, mean PSM sulfadimidine concentration remained greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration indicative of sulfonamide susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates (4.75 μg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In vivo microdialysis for continuous monitoring of PSM sulfadimidine concentrations in unsedated horses was feasible. Intravenous administration of trimethoprim (5 mg/kg) and sulfadimidine (25 mg/kg) proved likely to be efficient for treating sinusitis caused by highly susceptible pathogens, providing that the dosing interval is 12 hours.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To monitor concentrations of sulfadimidine in the paranasal sinus mucosa (PSM) of unsedated horses following IV administration of trimethoprim-sulfadimidine via in vivo microdialysis.

ANIMALS 10 healthy adult horses.

PROCEDURES Concentric microdialysis probes were implanted into the subepithelial layers of the frontal sinus mucosa of standing sedated horses. Four hours after implantation, trimethoprim-sulfadimidine (30 mg/kg) was administered IV every 24 hours for 2 days; dialysate and plasma samples were collected at intervals during that 48-hour period and analyzed for concentrations of sulfadimidine. The dialysate concentration and relative loss of sulfadimidine from the perfusate were used to calculate the PSM concentration.

RESULTS Microdialysis probe implantation and subsequent in vivo microdialysis were successfully performed for all 10 horses. Following the first and second administration of trimethoprim-sulfadimidine, mean ± SD peak concentrations of sulfadimidine were 55.3 ± 10.3 μg/mL and 51.5 ± 8.7 μg/mL, respectively, in plasma and 9.6 ± 4.5 μg/mL and 7.0 ± 3.3 μg/mL, respectively, in the PSM. Peak sulfadimidine concentrations in the PSM were detected at 5.9 ± 2.7 hours and 5.4 ± 2.3 hours following the first and second drug administrations, respectively. For 12 hours, mean PSM sulfadimidine concentration remained greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration indicative of sulfonamide susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates (4.75 μg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In vivo microdialysis for continuous monitoring of PSM sulfadimidine concentrations in unsedated horses was feasible. Intravenous administration of trimethoprim (5 mg/kg) and sulfadimidine (25 mg/kg) proved likely to be efficient for treating sinusitis caused by highly susceptible pathogens, providing that the dosing interval is 12 hours.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Staszyk's present address is Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35392 Gießen, Germany.

Dr. Bienert-Zeit and Dr. Gietz are joint first authors. Dr. Stahl and Dr. Ohnesorge contributed equally to this work.

Address correspondence to Dr. Bienert-Zeit (astrid.bienert@tiho-hannover.de).
  • 1. Nickels FA. Nasal passages and paranasal sinuses. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. 3rd ed. St Louis: Saunders/Elsevier, 2006;533544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. O'Leary JM, Dixon PM. A review of equine paranasal sinusitis. Aetiopathogenesis, clinical signs and ancillary diagnostic techniques. Equine Vet Educ 2011; 23: 148159.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Tremaine WH, Dixon PM. A long-term study of 277 cases of equine sinonasal disease. Part 1: details of horses, historical, clinical and ancillary diagnostic findings. Equine Vet J 2001; 33: 274282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Tremaine WH, Clarke CJ, Dixon PM. Histopathological findings in equine sinonasal disorders. Equine Vet J 1999; 31: 296303.

  • 5. Boulton CH. Equine nasal cavity and paranasal sinus disease: a review of 85 cases. J Equine Vet Sci 1985; 5: 268275.

  • 6. Tremaine WH, Dixon PM. A long-term study of 277 cases of equine sinonasal disease. Part 2: treatments and results of treatments. Equine Vet J 2001; 33: 283289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Mason BJ. Empyema of the equine paranasal sinuses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975; 167: 727731.

  • 8. Trotter GW. Paranasal sinuses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1993; 9: 153169.

  • 9. Dixon PM, Parkin TD, Collins N, et al. Equine paranasal sinus disease: a long-term study of 200 cases (1997–2009): treatments and long-term results of treatments. Equine Vet J 2012; 44: 272276.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Schumacher J, Honnas C, Smith B. Paranasal sinusitis complicated by inspissated exudate in the ventral conchal sinus. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 373377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Müller M, dela Peña A, Derendorf H. Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: distribution in tissue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 14411453.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Steiner I, Müller M, Joukhadar C. Antibiotika im schwer erreichbaren Kompartiment—Grundlagen und Klinik. Chemother J 2004; 13: 195202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Prescott JF. Sulfonamides, diaminopyrimidines, and their combinations. In: Giguère S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, et al, eds. Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2006;249262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Haggett EF, Wilson WD. Overview of the use of antimicrobials for the treatment of bacterial infections in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2008; 20: 433448.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Brown MP, Gronwall R, Castro L. Pharmacokinetics and body fluid and endometrial concentrations of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in mares. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 918922.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Brown MP, Kelly RH, Stover SM, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine in the horse: serum, synovial, peritoneal, and urine concentrations after single-dose intravenous administration. Am J Vet Res 1983; 44: 540543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Winther L, Guardabassi L, Baptiste KE, et al. Antimicrobial disposition in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid of horses. Part I. Sulfadiazine and trimethoprim. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 277284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. van Duijkeren E, Ensink JM, Meijer LA. Distribution of orally administered trimethoprim and sulfadiazine into noninfected subcutaneous tissue chambers in adult ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2002; 25: 273277.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Ensink JM, Bosch G, van Duijkeren E. Clinical efficacy of prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in a Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection model in ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005; 28: 4549.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Müller M, Haag O, Burgdorff T, et al. Characterization of peripheral-compartment kinetics of antibiotics by in vivo microdialysis in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40: 27032709.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Ryan DM. Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in natural and experimental superficial compartments in animals and humans. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31(suppl D):116.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Joukhadar C, Derendorf H, Müller M. Microdialysis. A novel tool for clinical studies of anti-infective agents. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57: 211219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Ungerstedt U. Microdialysis—principles and applications for studies in animals and man. J Intern Med 1991; 230: 365373.

  • 24. Brunner M, Derendorf H, Müller M. Microdialysis for in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characterization of antiinfective drugs. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2005; 5: 495499.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. de Lange EC, De Boer AG, Breimer DD. Methodological issues in microdialysis sampling for pharmacokinetic studies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2000; 45: 125148.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Chaurasia CS, Müller M, Bashaw ED, et al. AAPS-FDA Workshop white paper: microdialysis principles, application, and regulatory perspectives. J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 47: 589603.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Plock N, Kloft C. Microdialysis—theoretical background and recent implementation in applied life-sciences. Eur J Pharm Sci 2005; 25: 124.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Bouw MR, Hammarlund-Udenaes M. Methodological aspects of the use of a calibrator in in vivo microdialysis—further development of the retrodialysis method. Pharm Res 1998; 15: 16731679.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Nouws JF, Vree TB, Baakman M, et al. Disposition of sulfadimidine and its N4-acetyl and hydroxy metabolites in horse plasma. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1985; 8: 303311.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. van Duijkeren E, Vulto AG, Van Miert AS. Trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations in the horse: a review. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1994; 17: 6473.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. van Duijkeren E, Vulto AG, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, et al. A comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral trimethoprim/sulfadiazine formulations in the horse. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1994; 17: 440446.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. van Duijkeren E, Vulto AG, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim/sulphachlorpyridazine in horses after oral, nasogastric and intravenous administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1995; 18: 4753.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Bertone AL, Jones RL, McIlwraith CW. Serum and synovial fluid steady-state concentrations of trimethoprim and sulfadiazine in horses with experimentally induced infectious arthritis. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 16811687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Toutain PL. PK/PD approach for antibiotics: tissue or blood drug levels to predict antibiotic efficacy. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2009; 11: 1921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Hirsh DC, et al. Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 447450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Hirsh DC, Jang SS. Antimicrobic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens from horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1987; 3: 181190.

  • 37. Ensink JM, Van Klingeren B, Houwers DJ, et al. In-vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs of bacterial isolates from horses in The Netherlands. Equine Vet J 1993; 25: 309313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Fey K, Schmid P. Empfindlichkeit bakterieller Krankheitserreger aus dem Respirationstrakt von Pferden gegenüber Trimethoprim, Sulfadoxin, Sulfadimethoxin und Kombinationen dieser Wirkstoffe. Tierarztl Prax 1995; 23: 148154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Brunner M, Langer O. Microdialysis versus other techniques for the clinical assessment of in vivo tissue drug distribution. AAPS J 2006; 8: E263E271.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Ryan DM. Influence of surface area/volume ratio on the kinetics of antibiotics in different tissues and tissue fluids. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 1985;(44):2433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement