Tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses

Lori J. Best Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Lori J. Best in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Diane V. H. Hendrix Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Diane V. H. Hendrix in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Daniel A. Ward Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Daniel A. Ward in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses.

ANIMALS 15 healthy adult horses.

PROCEDURES Each horse was manually restrained, and an ophthalmic examination, which included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and a Schirmer tear test, was performed. Tear samples were collected from both eyes with microcapillary tubes 3 times at 5-minute intervals. The tear samples for each horse were pooled, and the osmolality and electrolyte concentrations were measured. The mean (SD) was calculated for each variable to establish preliminary guidelines for tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses.

RESULTS The mean (SD) tear film osmolality was 283.51 (9.33) mmol/kg, and the mean (SD) sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium concentrations were 134.75 (10), 16.3 (5.77), 3.48 (1.97), and 1.06 (0.42) mmol/L, respectively. The sodium concentration in the tear film was similar to that in serum, whereas the potassium concentration in the tear film was approximately 4.75 times that of serum.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results provided preliminary guidelines with which tear samples obtained from horses with keratopathies can be compared. Measurement of tear film osmolality in these horses was easy and noninvasive. The tear film concentration of divalent cations was greater than expected and was higher than the divalent cation concentrations in the tear films of rabbits and humans. These data may be clinically useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of hyperosmolar ocular surface disease in horses.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses.

ANIMALS 15 healthy adult horses.

PROCEDURES Each horse was manually restrained, and an ophthalmic examination, which included slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and a Schirmer tear test, was performed. Tear samples were collected from both eyes with microcapillary tubes 3 times at 5-minute intervals. The tear samples for each horse were pooled, and the osmolality and electrolyte concentrations were measured. The mean (SD) was calculated for each variable to establish preliminary guidelines for tear film osmolality and electrolyte composition in healthy horses.

RESULTS The mean (SD) tear film osmolality was 283.51 (9.33) mmol/kg, and the mean (SD) sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium concentrations were 134.75 (10), 16.3 (5.77), 3.48 (1.97), and 1.06 (0.42) mmol/L, respectively. The sodium concentration in the tear film was similar to that in serum, whereas the potassium concentration in the tear film was approximately 4.75 times that of serum.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results provided preliminary guidelines with which tear samples obtained from horses with keratopathies can be compared. Measurement of tear film osmolality in these horses was easy and noninvasive. The tear film concentration of divalent cations was greater than expected and was higher than the divalent cation concentrations in the tear films of rabbits and humans. These data may be clinically useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of hyperosmolar ocular surface disease in horses.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Ward (dward@utk.edu).
  • 1. Clode AB. Therapy of equine infectious keratitis: a review. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010;(37): 19–23.

  • 2. Andrew SE, Willis AM. Diseases of the cornea and sclera. In: Gilger BC, ed. Equine ophthalmology. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2005;157–251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Matthews AG. Nonulcerative keratopathies in the horse. Equine Vet Educ 2000; 12: 271–278.

  • 4. Gilger BC, Michau TM, Salmon JH. Immune-mediated keratitis in horses: 19 cases (1998–2004). Vet Ophthalmol 2005; 8: 233–239.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Ousler GW, Gomes PJ, Welch D, et al., Methodologies for the study of ocular surface disease. Ocul Surf 2005; 3: 143–154.

  • 6. Abelson MB, Ousler GW, Nally LA, et al., Alternative reference values for tear film break up time in normal and dry eye populations. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506 (Pt B): 1121–1125.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Nelson JD. Superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK). Eye (Lond) 1989; 3: 180–189.

  • 8. Inoue K, Kato S, Ohara C, et al., Ocular and systemic factors relevant to diabetic keratoepitheliopathy. Cornea 2001; 20: 798–801.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Khanal S, Tomlinson A. Tear physiology in dry eye associated with chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 115–119.

  • 10. Van Kampen KR, James LF. Ophthalmic lesions in loco-weed poisoning of cattle, sheep, and horses. Am J Vet Res 1971; 32: 1293–1295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Spurlock SL, Spurlock GH, Wise M. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca associated with fracture of the stylohyoid bone in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 194: 258–259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Spiess BM, Wilcock BP, Physick-Sheard PW. Eosinophilic granulomatous dacryoadenitis causing bilateral keratoconjunctivitis sicca in a horse. Equine Vet J 1989; 21: 226–228.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Sweeney DF, Millar TJ, Raju SR. Tear film stability: a review. Exp Eye Res 2013; 117: 28–38.

  • 14. Ollivier FJ. The precorneal tear film in horses: its importance and disorders. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2004; 20: 301–318.

  • 15. Lemp MA, Bron AJ, Baudouin C, et al., Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 792–798.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Sullivan BD, Whitmer D, Nichols KK, et al., An objective approach to dry eye disease severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6125–6130.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Wei XE, Markoulli M, Millar TJ, et al., Divalent cations in tears, and their influence on tear film stability in humans and rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 3280–3285.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, et al., Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4309–4315.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Mudgil P, Millar TJ. Surfactant properties of human meibomian lipids. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1661–1670.

  • 20. Dartt DA. Formation and function of the tear film. In: Leven LA, Nilsson SFE, VerHoeve J, eds. Adler's physiology of the eye. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011;350–362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Davis K, Townsend W. Tear-film osmolarity in normal cats and cats with conjunctivitis. Vet Ophthalmol 2011; 14: 54–59.

  • 22. Chen T, Ward DA. Tear volume, turnover rate, and flow rate in ophthalmologically normal horses. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 671–676.

  • 23. Beech J, Zappala RA, Smith G, et al., Schirmer tear test results in normal horses and ponies: effect of age, season, environment, sex, time of day and placement of strips. Vet Ophthalmol 2003; 6: 251–254.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. McGinnigle S, Naroo SA, Eperjesi F. Evaluation of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol 2012; 57: 293–316.

  • 25. Chakraborti S, Mandal M, Das S, et al., Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases: an overview. Mol Cell Biochem 2003; 253: 269–285.

  • 26. Wang C, Zhan C, Cai Q, et al., Expression and characterization of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) matrix metalloproteinase-2 and its activity against type I collagen. J Biotechnol 2014; 177: 45–52.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Ollivier FJ, Gilger BC, Barrie KP, et al., Proteinases of the cornea and preocular tear film. Vet Ophthalmol 2007; 10: 199–206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Maidment DC, Kidder DE, Taylor MN. Electrolyte and protein levels in bovine tears. Br Vet J 1985; 141: 169–173.

  • 29. Mircheff AK. Lacrimal fluid and electrolyte secretion: a review. Curr Eye Res 1989; 8: 607–617.

  • 30. Erstad BL. Osmolality and osmolarity: narrowing the terminology gap. Pharmacotherapy 2003; 23: 1085–1086.

  • 31. Craig JP, Tomlinson A. Age and gender effects on the normal tear film. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 438: 411–415.

  • 32. Maïssa C, Guillon M. Tear film dynamics and lipid layer characteristics—effect of age and gender. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 176–182.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Maruyama K, Yokoi N, Takamata A, et al., Effect of environmental conditions on tear dynamics in soft contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2563–2568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Piccione G, Giannetto C, Fazio F, et al., Daily rhythm of tear production in normal horse. Vet Ophthalmol 2008; 11 (suppl 1): 57–60.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Terry JE, Hill RM. Human tear osmotic pressure: diurnal variations and the closed eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96: 120–122.

  • 36. Niimi J, Tan B, Chang J, et al., Diurnal pattern of tear osmolarity and its relationship to corneal thickness and deswelling. Cornea 2013; 32: 1305–1310.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement