Effect of ketamine on the minimum infusion rate of propofol needed to prevent motor movement in dogs

Rachel A. Reed Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Rachel A. Reed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
M. Reza Seddighi Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by M. Reza Seddighi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Agricola Odoi Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Agricola Odoi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM, PhD
,
Sherry K. Cox Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Sherry K. Cox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Christine M. Egger Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Christine M. Egger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MVSc
, and
Thomas J. Doherty Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Thomas J. Doherty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVB, MSc

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs anesthetized with propofol alone or propofol in combination with a constant rate infusion (CRI) of ketamine.

ANIMALS 6 male Beagles.

PROCEDURES Dogs were anesthetized on 3 occasions, at weekly intervals, with propofol alone (loading dose, 6 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.45 mg/kg/min), propofol (loading dose, 5 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.35 mg/kg/min) and a low dose of ketamine (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; CRI, 0.025 mg/kg/min), or propofol (loading dose, 4 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.3 mg/kg/min) and a high dose of ketamine (loading dose, 3 mg/kg; CRI, 0.05 mg/kg/min). After 60 minutes, the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious electrical stimulus was determined in duplicate.

RESULTS Least squares mean ± SEM propofol MIRs required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus were 0.76 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, 0.60 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, and 0.41 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min when dogs were anesthetized with propofol alone, propofol and low-dose ketamine, and propofol and high-dose ketamine, respectively. There were significant decreases in the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus when dogs were anesthetized with propofol and low-dose ketamine (27 ± 10%) or with propofol and high-dose ketamine (30 ± 10%).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Ketamine, at the doses studied, significantly decreased the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs anesthetized with propofol alone or propofol in combination with a constant rate infusion (CRI) of ketamine.

ANIMALS 6 male Beagles.

PROCEDURES Dogs were anesthetized on 3 occasions, at weekly intervals, with propofol alone (loading dose, 6 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.45 mg/kg/min), propofol (loading dose, 5 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.35 mg/kg/min) and a low dose of ketamine (loading dose, 2 mg/kg; CRI, 0.025 mg/kg/min), or propofol (loading dose, 4 mg/kg; initial CRI, 0.3 mg/kg/min) and a high dose of ketamine (loading dose, 3 mg/kg; CRI, 0.05 mg/kg/min). After 60 minutes, the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious electrical stimulus was determined in duplicate.

RESULTS Least squares mean ± SEM propofol MIRs required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus were 0.76 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, 0.60 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, and 0.41 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min when dogs were anesthetized with propofol alone, propofol and low-dose ketamine, and propofol and high-dose ketamine, respectively. There were significant decreases in the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus when dogs were anesthetized with propofol and low-dose ketamine (27 ± 10%) or with propofol and high-dose ketamine (30 ± 10%).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Ketamine, at the doses studied, significantly decreased the propofol MIR required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus in dogs.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Reed (rachel.anne.reed@gmail.com).
  • 1. Glen JB, White M. A comparison of the predictive performance of three pharmacokinetic models for propofol using measured values obtained during target-controlled infusion. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 550557.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Adams HA, Schmitz CS, Baltes-Gotz B. Endocrine stress reaction, hemodynamics and recovery in total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane [in German]. Anaesthesist 1994; 43: 730737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Chen L, Yu L, Fan Y, et al., A comparison between total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol plus remifentanil and volatile induction/maintenance of anaesthesia using sevoflurane in children undergoing flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 742749.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Hall LW, Chambers JP. A clinical trial of propofol infusion anaesthesia in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1987; 28: 623637.

  • 5. Keegan RD, Greene SA. Cardiovascular effects of a continuous two-hour propofol infusion in dogs. Comparison with isoflurane anesthesia. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 537543.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Nagashima Y, Furukawa Y, Chiba S. Propofol decreases contractility of isolated blood-perfused left ventricular muscle in the dog. J Anesth 2000; 14: 4547.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Nolan A, Reid J. Pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by infusion in dogs undergoing surgery. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 546551.

  • 8. Frölich MA, Price DD, Robinson ME, et al., The effect of propofol on thermal pain perception. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 481486.

  • 9. Cruz FS, Carregaro AB, Raiser AG, et al. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and S(+)-ketamine in rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010; 37: 116122.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Oku K, Ohta M, Yamanaka T, et al., The minimum infusion rate (MIR) of propofol for total intravenous anesthesia after premedication with xylazine in horses. J Vet Med Sci 2005; 67: 569575.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Kennedy MJ, Smith LJ. A comparison of cardiopulmonary function, recovery quality, and total dosages required for induction and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus a propofol-ketamine combination in healthy Beagle dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015; 42: 350359.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Mannarino R, Luna SPL, Monteiro ER, et al., Minimum infusion rate and hemodynamic effects of propofol, propofol-lidocaine and propofol-lidocaine-ketamine in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012; 39: 160173.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Guit JB, Koning HM, Coster ML, et al., Ketamine as analgesic for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 2427.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Seliskar A, Nemec A, Roskar T, et al., Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or propofol/ketamine in spontaneously breathing dogs premedicated with medetomidine. Vet Rec 2007; 160: 8591.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Ilkiw JE, Pascoe PJ, Tripp LD. Effect of variable-dose propofol alone and in combination with two fixed doses of ketamine for total intravenous anesthesia in cats. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 907912.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Flaherty D, Reid J, Welsh E, et al., A pharmacodynamic study of propofol or propofol and ketamine infusions in ponies undergoing surgery. Res Vet Sci 1997; 62: 179184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Valverde A, Morey TE, Hernández J, et al., Validation of several types of noxious stimuli for use in determining the minimum alveolar concentration for inhalation anesthetics in dogs and rabbits. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 957962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Wilson J, Doherty TJ, Egger CM, et al., Effects of intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, and the combination on the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008; 35: 289296.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Seddighi R, Egger CM, Rohrbach BW, et al., Effect of nitrous oxide on the minimum alveolar concentration for sevoflurane and the minimum alveolar concentration derivatives that prevent motor movement and autonomic responses in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2012; 73: 341345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Voulgaris DA, Egger CM, Seddighi MR, et al., The effect of nitrous oxide on the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and MAC derivatives of isoflurane in dogs. Can J Vet Res 2013; 77: 131135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Hall LW, Lagerweij E, Nolan AM, et al., Effect of medetomidine on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 116120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Joubert KE. Computer simulations of propofol infusions for total intravenous anaesthesia in dogs. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2009; 80: 29.

  • 23. de Vries A, Taylor PM, Troughton G, et al., Real time monitoring of propofol blood concentration in ponies anaesthetized with propofol and ketamine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013; 36: 258266.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Li R, Zhang WS, Liu J, et al., Minimum infusion rates and recovery times from different durations of continuous infusion of fospropofol, a prodrug of propofol, in rabbits: a comparison with propofol emulsion. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012; 39: 373384.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ, Plummer GF, et al., The pharmacokinetics of propofol in laboratory animals. Xenobiotica 1992; 22: 369375.

  • 26. Zonca A, Ravasio G, Gallo M, et al., Pharmacokinetics of ketamine and propofol combination administered as ketofol via continuous infusion in cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35: 580587.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Beths T, Glen JB, Reid J, et al., Evaluation and optimisation of a target-controlled infusion system for administering propofol to dogs as part of a total intravenous anaesthetic technique during dental surgery. Vet Rec 2001; 148: 198203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Smith C, McEwan AI, Jhaveri R, et al., The interaction of fentanyl on the Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 820828.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Nagashima Y, Furukawa Y, Hirose M, et al., Cardiac effects of propofol and its interaction with autonomic nervous system in isolated, cross-circulated canine atria. J Anesth 1999; 13: 3439.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Pagel PS, Warltier DC. Negative inotropic effects of propofol as evaluated by the regional preload recruitable stroke work relationship in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 100108.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Tweed WA, Minuck M, Mymin D. Circulatory responses to ketamine anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1972; 37: 613619.

  • 32. Glowaski MM, Wetmore LA. Propofol: application in veterinary sedation and anesthesia. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999; 14: 19.

  • 33. Lerche P, Nolan AM, Reid J. Comparative study of propofol or propofol and ketamine for the induction of anaesthesia in dogs. Vet Rec 2000; 146: 571574.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Wright PJ, Clarke RS, Dundee JW, et al., Infusion rates for anaesthesia with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 613616.

  • 35. Davies C. Excitatory phenomena following the use of propofol in dogs. J Vet Anaesth 1991; 18: 4851.

  • 36. Robertson SA, Johnston S, Beemsterboer J. Cardiopulmonary, anesthetic, and postanesthetic effects of intravenous infusions of propofol in Greyhounds and non-Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 10271032.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Cattai A, Rabozzi R, Natale V, et al., The incidence of spontaneous movements (myoclonus) in dogs undergoing total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015; 42: 9398.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Reddy RV, Moorthy SS, Dierdorf SF, et al., Excitatory effects of electroencephalographic correlation of etomidate, thiopental, methohexital and propofol. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 10081011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Dolin SJ, Smith MB, Soar J, et al., Does glycine antagonism underlie the excitatory effects of methohexitone and propofol. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 523526.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement