Evaluation of the safety of long-term, daily oral administration of grapiprant, a novel drug for treatment of osteoarthritic pain and inflammation, in healthy dogs

Lesley C. Rausch-Derra Aratana Therapeutics Inc, 1901 Olathe Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66103.

Search for other papers by Lesley C. Rausch-Derra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Margie Huebner Clin-Data Services Inc, 6716 Holyoke Ct., Fort Collins, CO 80525.

Search for other papers by Margie Huebner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
Linda Rhodes Aratana Therapeutics Inc, 1901 Olathe Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66103.

Search for other papers by Linda Rhodes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety of daily oral administration of grapiprant to dogs.

ANIMALS Thirty-six 9-month-old Beagles of both sexes.

PROCEDURES Dogs were randomly assigned to groups that received grapiprant via oral gavage at 0, 1, 6, or 50 mg/kg (total volume, 5 mL/kg), q 24 h for 9 months. Each group contained 4 dogs of each sex (ie, 8 dogs/group), except for the 50 mg/kg group, which included 4 additional dogs that were monitored for an additional 30 days after treatment concluded (recovery period). All dogs received ophthalmologic, ECG, and laboratory evaluations before treatment began (baseline) and periodically afterward. All dogs were observed daily. Dogs were euthanized at the end of the study for necropsy and histologic evaluation.

RESULTS All dogs remained clinically normal during treatment, with no apparent changes in appetite or demeanor. Emesis and soft or mucoid feces that occasionally contained blood were observed in all groups, although these findings were more common in dogs that received grapiprant. In general, clinicopathologic findings remained within baseline ranges. Drug-related changes in serum total protein and albumin concentrations were detected, but differences were small and resolved during recovery. No drug-related gross or microscopic pathological changes were detected in tissue samples except mild mucosal regeneration in the ileum of 1 dog in the 50 mg/kg group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested the safety of long-term oral administration of grapiprant to dogs. Efficacy of grapiprant in the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis needs to be evaluated in other studies.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety of daily oral administration of grapiprant to dogs.

ANIMALS Thirty-six 9-month-old Beagles of both sexes.

PROCEDURES Dogs were randomly assigned to groups that received grapiprant via oral gavage at 0, 1, 6, or 50 mg/kg (total volume, 5 mL/kg), q 24 h for 9 months. Each group contained 4 dogs of each sex (ie, 8 dogs/group), except for the 50 mg/kg group, which included 4 additional dogs that were monitored for an additional 30 days after treatment concluded (recovery period). All dogs received ophthalmologic, ECG, and laboratory evaluations before treatment began (baseline) and periodically afterward. All dogs were observed daily. Dogs were euthanized at the end of the study for necropsy and histologic evaluation.

RESULTS All dogs remained clinically normal during treatment, with no apparent changes in appetite or demeanor. Emesis and soft or mucoid feces that occasionally contained blood were observed in all groups, although these findings were more common in dogs that received grapiprant. In general, clinicopathologic findings remained within baseline ranges. Drug-related changes in serum total protein and albumin concentrations were detected, but differences were small and resolved during recovery. No drug-related gross or microscopic pathological changes were detected in tissue samples except mild mucosal regeneration in the ileum of 1 dog in the 50 mg/kg group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested the safety of long-term oral administration of grapiprant to dogs. Efficacy of grapiprant in the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis needs to be evaluated in other studies.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Rausch-Derra (lrauschderra@aratana.com).
  • 1. Innes JF, Clayton J, Lascelles BDX. Review of the safety and efficacy of long-term NSAID use in the treatment of canine osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2010; 166: 226–230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Roush JK, Dodd CE, Fritsch DA, et al. Multicenter veterinary practice assessment of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010; 236: 59–66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Clark P, Rowland SE, Denis D, et al. MF498 [N-{[4-(5,9-diethoxy-6-oxo-6,8-dihydro-7Hpyrrolo[3,4-g]quinolin-7-yl)-3-methylbenzyl]sulfonyl}-2-(2-methoxyphenyl)acetamide], a selective E prostanoid receptor 4 antagonist, relieves joint inflammation and pain in rodent models of rheumatoid and osteoarthritis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 325: 425–434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Curry SL, Cogar SM, Cook JL. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 298–309.

  • 5. Lin C-R, Amaya F, Barrett L, et al. Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006; 319: 1096–1103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Bergh MS, Budsberg SC. The coxib NSAIDs: potential clinical and pharmacologic importance in veterinary medicine. J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19: 633–643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. World Health Organization. Programme on International Nonproprietary Names (INN). Pre-stems: suffixes used in the selection of INN. October 2013. Available at: www.who.int/medicines/services/inn/Prestem_Suffixes_201310.pdf. Accessed Jul 24, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Nakao K, Murase A, Ohshiro H, et al. CJ-023,423, a novel, potent and selective prostaglandin EP4 receptor antagonist with antihyperalgesic properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2007; 322: 686–694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. Standards for conduct of nonclinical studies on the safety of drugs. Ordinance No. 21. Tokyo: Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1997.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Environmental Directorate Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD series on principles of good laboratory practice and compliance monitoring; consensus document of the Working Group on Good Laboratory Practices; No 13, application of the OECD Principles of GLP to the organization and management of multi-site studies. Paris: OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT 9.3 user's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2011.

  • 12. KuKanich B, Bidgood T, Knesl O. Clinical pharmacology of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012; 39: 69–90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Kabashima K, Saji T, Murata T, et al. The prostaglandin receptor EP4 suppresses colitis, mucosal damage and CD4 cell activation in the gut. J Clin Invest 2002; 109: 883–893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Takeuchi K, Kato S, Amagase K. Prostaglandin EP receptors involved in modulating gastrointestinal mucosal integrity. J Pharmacol Sci 2010; 114: 248–261.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Benson RA, Patakas A, McQueenie R, et al. Arthritis in space and time—to boldly go FEBS Lett 2011; 585: 3640–3648.

Advertisement