Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam administered orally to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) for 29 days

Katie W. Delk Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Katie W. Delk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
James W. Carpenter Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by James W. Carpenter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
,
Butch KuKanich Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Butch KuKanich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Jerome C. Nietfeld Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Jerome C. Nietfeld in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Micah Kohles Oxbow Animal Health, 29012 Mill Rd, Murdock, NE 68407

Search for other papers by Micah Kohles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPA

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of meloxicam in rabbits when administered orally for 29 days.

Animals—6 healthy rabbits.

Procedures—Meloxicam (1.0 mg/kg, PO, q 24 h) was administered to rabbits for 29 days. Blood was collected immediately before (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after drug administration on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of meloxicam. On day 30, an additional sample was collected 36 hours after treatment. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were quantified with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Weekly plasma biochemical analyses were performed to evaluate any adverse physiologic effects. Rabbits were euthanatized for necropsy on day 31.

Results—Mean ± SD peak plasma concentrations of meloxicam after administration of doses 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 were 0.67 ± 0.19 μg/mL, 0.81 ± 0.21 μg/mL, 1.00 ± 0.31 μg/mL, 1.00 ± 0.29 μg/mL, and 1.07 ± 0.19 μg/mL, respectively; these concentrations did not differ significantly among doses 8 through 29. Results of plasma biochemical analyses were within reference ranges at all time points evaluated. Gross necropsy and histologic examination of tissues revealed no clinically relevant findings.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Plasma concentrations of meloxicam for rabbits in the present study were similar to those previously reported in rabbits that received 1. 0 mg of meloxicam/kg, PO every 24 hours, for 5 days. Results suggested that a dosage of 1. 0 mg/kg, PO, every 24 hours for up to 29 days may be safe for use in healthy rabbits.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of meloxicam in rabbits when administered orally for 29 days.

Animals—6 healthy rabbits.

Procedures—Meloxicam (1.0 mg/kg, PO, q 24 h) was administered to rabbits for 29 days. Blood was collected immediately before (time 0) and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after drug administration on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of meloxicam. On day 30, an additional sample was collected 36 hours after treatment. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were quantified with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Weekly plasma biochemical analyses were performed to evaluate any adverse physiologic effects. Rabbits were euthanatized for necropsy on day 31.

Results—Mean ± SD peak plasma concentrations of meloxicam after administration of doses 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 were 0.67 ± 0.19 μg/mL, 0.81 ± 0.21 μg/mL, 1.00 ± 0.31 μg/mL, 1.00 ± 0.29 μg/mL, and 1.07 ± 0.19 μg/mL, respectively; these concentrations did not differ significantly among doses 8 through 29. Results of plasma biochemical analyses were within reference ranges at all time points evaluated. Gross necropsy and histologic examination of tissues revealed no clinically relevant findings.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Plasma concentrations of meloxicam for rabbits in the present study were similar to those previously reported in rabbits that received 1. 0 mg of meloxicam/kg, PO every 24 hours, for 5 days. Results suggested that a dosage of 1. 0 mg/kg, PO, every 24 hours for up to 29 days may be safe for use in healthy rabbits.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Delk's present address is Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Supported by Oxbow Animal Health.

Presented in abstract form at the 35th Annual Association of Avian Veterinarians Conference, Jacksonville, Fla, August 2013, and at the 12th Annual Conference of the Association of Exotic Mammal Veterinarians, Indianapolis, Ind, September 2013.

The authors thank Christine Hackworth, Robert Martinez, Drew Pearson, Nolan McClain, Amy Guernsey, and Caitlin Kozel for assistance with sample collection and analysis.

Address correspondence to Dr. Delk (katie.delk@gmail.com).
  • 1. Streppa HK, Jones CJ, Budsberg SC. Cyclooxygenase selectivity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in canine blood. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 9194.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Carpenter JW, Pollock CG, Koch DE, et al. Single and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of meloxicam after oral administration to the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Zoo Wildl Med 2009; 40: 601606.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Davies NM, Skjodt NM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of meloxicam; a cyclo-oxygenase-2 preferential nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 36: 115126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Luna SPL, Basilio AC, Steagall PVM, et al. Evaluation of adverse effects of long-term oral administration of carprofen, etodolac, flunixin meglumine, ketoprofen, and meloxicam in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 258264.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Peterson KD, Keefe TJ. Effects of meloxicam on severity of lameness and other clinical signs of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225: 10561060.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Doig PA, Purbrick KA, Hare JE, et al. Clinical efficacy and tolerance of meloxicam in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis. Can Vet J 2000; 41: 296300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Moreau M, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH, et al. Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and meloxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 323329.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Caulkett N, Read M, Fowler D, et al. A comparison of the analgesic effects of butorphanol with those of meloxicam after elective ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Can Vet J 2003; 44: 565570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Carroll GL, Howe LB, Peterson KD. Analgesic efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam or butorphanol in onychectomized cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 913919.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Mathews KA, Pettifer G, Foster R, et al. Safety and efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam, compared with that of ketoprofen and butorphanol in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 882888.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Jones CJ, Budsberg SC. Physiologic characteristics and clinical importance of the cyclooxygenase isoforms in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 721729.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Jones CJ, Streppa HK, Harmon BG, et al. In vivo effects of meloxicam and aspirin on blood, gastric mucosal, and synovial fluid prostanoid synthesis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 15271531.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Engelhardt G. Pharmacology of meloxicam, a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with an improved safety profile through preferential inhibition of COX-2. Rheumatology 1996; 35 (suppl 1): 412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Curry SL, Cogar SM, Cook JL. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 298309.

  • 15. Forsyth SF, Guilford WG, Haslett SJ, et al. Endoscopy of the gastroduodenal mucosa after carprofen, meloxicam and ketoprofen administration in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 421424.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. MacPhail CM, Lappin MR, Meyer DJ, et al. Hepatocellular toxicosis associated with administration of carprofen in 21 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 18951901.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Turner PV, Chen HC, Taylor MW. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in rabbits after single and repeat oral dosing. Comp Med 2006; 56: 6367.

  • 18. Toutain PL, Reymond N, Laroute V, et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in plasma and urine of horses. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 15421547.

  • 19. Fredholm DV, Carpenter JW, KuKanich B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in rabbits after oral administration of single and multiple doses. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74: 636641.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Fiorello CV, Divers SJ. Rabbits. In: Carpenter JW, ed. Exotic animal formulary. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier, 2012;517559.

  • 21. Montoya L, Ambrose L, Kreil V, et al. A pharmacokinetic comparison of meloxicam and ketoprofen following oral administration to healthy dogs. Vet Res Commun 2004; 28: 415428.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Giraudel JM, Diquelou A, Laroute V, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of NSAIDs in a model of reversible inflammation in the cat. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 146: 642653.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement