Evaluation of gait-related variables in lean and obese dogs at a trot

Robert B. Brady Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.

Search for other papers by Robert B. Brady in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Alexis N. Sidiropoulos Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.

Search for other papers by Alexis N. Sidiropoulos in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Hunter J. Bennett Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.

Search for other papers by Hunter J. Bennett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Patrick M. Rider Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.

Search for other papers by Patrick M. Rider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Denis J. Marcellin-Little Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Denis J. Marcellin-Little in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DEDV
, and
Paul DeVita Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.

Search for other papers by Paul DeVita in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To assess differences in sagittal plane joint kinematics and ground reaction forces between lean and obese adult dogs of similar sizes at 2 trotting velocities.

Animals—16 adult dogs.

Procedures—Dogs with body condition score (BCS) of 8 or 9 (obese dogs; n = 8) and dogs with BCS of 4 or 5 (lean dogs; 8) on a 9-point scale were evaluated. Sagittal plane joint kinematic and ground reaction force data were obtained from dogs trotting at 1.8 and 2.5 m/s with a 3-D motion capture system, a force platform, and 12 infrared markers placed on bony landmarks.

Results—Mean stride lengths for forelimbs and hind limbs at both velocities were shorter in obese than in lean dogs. Stance phase range of motion (ROM) was greater in obese dogs than in lean dogs for shoulder (28.2° vs 20.6°), elbow (23.6° vs 16.4°), hip (27.2° vs 22.9°), and tarsal (38.9° vs 27.9°) joints at both velocities. Swing phase ROM was greater in obese dogs than in lean dogs for elbow (61.2° vs 53.7°) and hip (34.4° vs 29.8°) joints. Increased velocity was associated with increased stance ROM in elbow joints and increased stance and swing ROM in hip joints of obese dogs. Obese dogs exerted greater peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces than did lean dogs. Body mass and peak vertical ground reaction force were significantly correlated.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Greater ROM detected during the stance phase and greater ground reaction forces in the gait of obese dogs, compared with lean dogs, may cause greater compressive forces within joints and could influence the development of osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Objective—To assess differences in sagittal plane joint kinematics and ground reaction forces between lean and obese adult dogs of similar sizes at 2 trotting velocities.

Animals—16 adult dogs.

Procedures—Dogs with body condition score (BCS) of 8 or 9 (obese dogs; n = 8) and dogs with BCS of 4 or 5 (lean dogs; 8) on a 9-point scale were evaluated. Sagittal plane joint kinematic and ground reaction force data were obtained from dogs trotting at 1.8 and 2.5 m/s with a 3-D motion capture system, a force platform, and 12 infrared markers placed on bony landmarks.

Results—Mean stride lengths for forelimbs and hind limbs at both velocities were shorter in obese than in lean dogs. Stance phase range of motion (ROM) was greater in obese dogs than in lean dogs for shoulder (28.2° vs 20.6°), elbow (23.6° vs 16.4°), hip (27.2° vs 22.9°), and tarsal (38.9° vs 27.9°) joints at both velocities. Swing phase ROM was greater in obese dogs than in lean dogs for elbow (61.2° vs 53.7°) and hip (34.4° vs 29.8°) joints. Increased velocity was associated with increased stance ROM in elbow joints and increased stance and swing ROM in hip joints of obese dogs. Obese dogs exerted greater peak vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces than did lean dogs. Body mass and peak vertical ground reaction force were significantly correlated.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Greater ROM detected during the stance phase and greater ground reaction forces in the gait of obese dogs, compared with lean dogs, may cause greater compressive forces within joints and could influence the development of osteoarthritis.

Contributor Notes

Presented in part at East Carolina University Research and Creative Achievement Week, Greenville, NC, March 2012, and at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, Gainesville, Fla, August 2012.

Address correspondence to Dr. Marcellin-Little (denis_marcellin@ncsu.edu).
  • 1. Gossellin J, Wren JA, Sunderland SJ. Canine obesity: an overview. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2007; 30 (suppl 1):110.

  • 2. Impellizeri JA, Tetrick MA, Muir P. Effect of weight reduction on clinical signs of lameness in dogs with hip osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216:10891091.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Courcier EA, Thomson RM, Mellor DJ, et al. An epidemiological study of environmental factors associated with canine obesity. J Small Anim Pract 2010; 51:362367.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Scarlett JM, Donoghue S, Saidla J, et al. Overweight cats: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994; 18 (suppl 1):S22S28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Budsberg SC, Bartges JW. Nutrition and osteoarthritis in dogs: does it help? Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2006; 36:13071323.

  • 6. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med 2006; 4:177186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. White GA, Hobson-West P, Cobb K, et al. Canine obesity: is there a difference between veterinarian and owner perception? J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52:622626.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Mawby DI, Bartges JW, d'Avignon A, et al. Comparison of various methods for estimating body fat in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2004; 40:109114.

  • 9. German AJ, Holden SL, Morris PJ, et al. Long-term follow-up after weight management in obese dogs: the role of diet in preventing regain. Vet J 2012; 192:6570.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Huck JL, Biery DN, Lawler DF, et al. A longitudinal study of the influence of lifetime food restriction on development of osteoarthritis in the canine elbow. Vet Surg 2009; 38:192198.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Manens J, Bolognin M, Bernaerts F, et al. Effects of obesity on lung function and airway reactivity in healthy dogs. Vet J 2012; 193:217221.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Marshall WG, Hazewinkel HA, Mullen D, et al. The effect of weight loss on lameness in obese dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Res Commun 2010; 34:241253.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Aaboe J, Bliddal H, Messier SP, et al. Effects of an intensive weight loss program on knee joint loading in obese adults with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19:822828.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Messier SP, Legault C, Loeser RF, et al. Does high weight loss in older adults with knee osteoarthritis affect bone-on-bone joint loads and muscle forces during walking? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19:272280.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Browning RC, Kram R. Effects of obesity on the biomechanics of walking at different speeds. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39:16321641.

  • 16. DeVita P, Hortobagyi T. Obesity is not associated with increased knee joint torque and power during level walking. J Biomech 2003; 36:13551362.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Marshall W, Bockstahler B, Hulse D, et al. A review of osteoarthritis and obesity: current understanding of the relationship and benefit of obesity treatment and prevention in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22:339345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Evans H. Miller's anatomy of the dog. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1993.

  • 19. Mercer JA, Devita P, Derrick TR, et al. Individual effects of stride length and frequency on shock attenuation during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35:307313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Messier SP, Ettinger WH Jr, Doyle TE. Obesity: effects on gait in an osteoarthritic population. J Appl Biomech 1996; 12:161172.

  • 21. Winby CR, Lloyd DG, Besier TF, et al. Muscle and external load contribution to knee joint contact loads during normal gait. J Biomech 2009; 42:22942300.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Sasaki K, Neptune RR. Individual muscle contributions to the axial knee joint contact force during normal walking. J Biomech 2010; 43:27802784.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Ren L, Miller CE, Lair R, et al. Integration of biomechanical compliance, leverage, and power in elephant limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:70787082.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Browning RC, Modica JR, Kram R, et al. The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39:515525.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Kaufman KR, Hughes C, Morrey BF, et al. Gait characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2001; 34:907915.

  • 26. Zeni JA Jr, Higginson JS. Differences in gait parameters between healthy subjects and persons with moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis: a result of altered walking speed? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009; 24:372378.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Biewener AA, Farley CT, Roberts TJ, et al. Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost. J Appl Physiol 2004; 97:22662274.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Langman VA, Roberts TJ, Black J, et al. Moving cheaply: energetics of walking in the African elephant. J Exp Biol 1995; 198:629632.

  • 29. Ren L, Butler M, Miller C, et al. The movements of limb segments and joints during locomotion in African and Asian elephants. J Exp Biol 2008; 211:27352751.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. DeVita P, Hortobagyi T. Age increases the skeletal versus muscular component of lower extremity stiffness during stepping down. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55:B593B600.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Helseth J, Hortobagyi T & Devita P. How do low horizontal forces produce disproportionately high torques in human locomotion? J Biomech 2008; 41:17471753.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. D'Amico LL, Xie L, Abell LK, et al. Relationships of hip joint volume ratios with degrees of joint laxity and degenerative disease from youth to maturity in a canine population predisposed to hip joint osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72:376383.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30:556569.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Runge JJ, Kelly SP, Gregor TP, et al. Distraction index as a risk factor for osteoarthritis associated with hip dysplasia in four large dog breeds. J Small Anim Pract 2010; 51:264269.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Gray MJ, Lambrechts NE, Maritz NG, et al. A biomechanical investigation of the static stabilisers of the glenohumeral joint in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18:5561.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Kealy RD, Lawler DF, Ballam JM, et al. Evaluation of the effect of limited food consumption on radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217:16781680.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Budsberg SC, Jevens DJ, Brown J, et al. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:15691574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Schaefer SL, DeCamp CE, Hauptman JG, et al. Kinematic gait analysis of hind limb symmetry in dogs at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1998; 59:680685.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Gillette RL, Zebas CJ. A two-dimensional analysis of limb symmetry in the trot of Labrador Retrievers. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35:515520.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Akbarshahi M, Schache AG, Fernandez JW, et al. Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity. J Biomech 2010; 43:12921301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Kim SY, Kim JY, Hayashi K, et al. Skin movement during the kinematic analysis of the canine pelvic limb. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24:326332.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Bauman JM, Chang YH. High-speed X-ray video demonstrates significant skin movement errors with standard optical kinematics during rat locomotion. J Neurosci Methods 2010; 186:1824.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, et al. Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 2006; 24:152164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement