Noninvasive measurements of body composition and body water via quantitative magnetic resonance, deuterium water, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in cats

Brian M. Zanghi Nestlé Purina PetCare Basic Research Group, Nestlé Research Center, 2 Research S, St Louis, MO 63164.

Search for other papers by Brian M. Zanghi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Carolyn J. Cupp Nestlé Purina PetCare Basic Research Group, Nestlé Research Center, 2 Research S, St Louis, MO 63164.

Search for other papers by Carolyn J. Cupp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
,
Yuanlong Pan Nestlé Purina PetCare Basic Research Group, Nestlé Research Center, 2 Research S, St Louis, MO 63164.

Search for other papers by Yuanlong Pan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM, PhD
,
Delphine G. Tissot-Favre Nestlé Purina PetCare Basic Research Group, Nestlé Research Center, 2 Research S, St Louis, MO 63164.

Search for other papers by Delphine G. Tissot-Favre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Norton W. Milgram CanCog Technologies, 120 Carlton St, Toronto, ON M5A 2K1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Norton W. Milgram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Tim R. Nagy Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294.

Search for other papers by Tim R. Nagy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Howard Dobson CanCog Technologies, 120 Carlton St, Toronto, ON M5A 2K1, Canada.
Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1H 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Howard Dobson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM&S, DVSc
Restricted access
Purchase Article

Abstract

Objective—To compare quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and deuterium oxide (D2O) dilution methods for measurement of total body water (TBW), lean body mass (LBM), and fat mass (FM) in healthy cats and to assess QMR precision and accuracy.

Animals—Domestic shorthair cats (58 and 32 cats for trials 1 and 2, respectively).

Procedures—QMR scans of awake cats performed with 2 units were followed by administration of D2O tracer (100 mg/kg, PO). Cats then were anesthetized, which was followed by QMR and DXA scans. Jugular blood samples were collected before and 120 minutes after D2O administration.

Results—QMR precision was similar between units (coefficient of variation < 2.9% for all measures). Fat mass, LBM, and TBW were similar for awake or sedated cats and differed by 4.0%, 3.4%, and 3.9%, respectively, depending on the unit. The QMR minimally underestimated TBW (1.4%) and LBM (4.4%) but significantly underestimated FM (29%), whereas DXA significantly underestimated LBM (9.2%) and quantitatively underestimated FM (9.3%). A significant relationship with D2O measurement was detected for all QMR (r2 > 0.84) and DXA (r2 > 0.84) measurements.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—QMR was useful for determining body composition in cats; precision was improved over DXA. Quantitative magnetic resonance can be used to safely and rapidly acquire data without the need for anesthesia, facilitating frequent monitoring of weight changes in geriatric, extremely young, or ill pets. Compared with the D2O dilution method, QMR correction equations provided accurate data over a range of body compositions.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 106 0 0
Full Text Views 2163 1493 162
PDF Downloads 347 134 7
Advertisement