Evaluation of economic and performance outcomes associated with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease in commercial feeder cattle

Natalia Cernicchiaro Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Natalia Cernicchiaro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Brad J. White Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Brad J. White in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
David G. Renter Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by David G. Renter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Abram H. Babcock Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Abram H. Babcock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate associations between economic and performance outcomes with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in commercial feedlot cattle.

Animals—212,867 cattle arriving in a Midwestern feedlot between 2001 and 2006.

Procedures—An economic model was created to estimate net returns. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine associations between the frequency of BRD treatments and other demographic variables with economic and performance outcomes.

Results—Net returns decreased with increasing number of treatments for BRD. However, the magnitude depended on the season during which cattle arrived at the feedlot, with significantly higher returns for cattle arriving during fall and summer than for cattle arriving during winter and spring. For fall arrivals, there were higher mean net returns for cattle that were never treated ($39.41) than for cattle treated once ($29.49), twice ($16.56), or ≥ 3 times (−$33.00). For summer arrivals, there were higher least squares mean net returns for cattle that were never treated ($31.83) than for cattle treated once ($20.22), twice ($6.37), or ≥ 3 times ($−42.56). Carcass traits pertaining to weight and quality grade were deemed responsible for differences in net returns among cattle receiving different numbers of treatments after an initial diagnosis of BRD.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Differences in economic net returns and performance outcomes for feedlot cattle were determined on the basis of number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of BRD; the analysis accounted for the season of arrival, sex, and weight class.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate associations between economic and performance outcomes with the number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in commercial feedlot cattle.

Animals—212,867 cattle arriving in a Midwestern feedlot between 2001 and 2006.

Procedures—An economic model was created to estimate net returns. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine associations between the frequency of BRD treatments and other demographic variables with economic and performance outcomes.

Results—Net returns decreased with increasing number of treatments for BRD. However, the magnitude depended on the season during which cattle arrived at the feedlot, with significantly higher returns for cattle arriving during fall and summer than for cattle arriving during winter and spring. For fall arrivals, there were higher mean net returns for cattle that were never treated ($39.41) than for cattle treated once ($29.49), twice ($16.56), or ≥ 3 times (−$33.00). For summer arrivals, there were higher least squares mean net returns for cattle that were never treated ($31.83) than for cattle treated once ($20.22), twice ($6.37), or ≥ 3 times ($−42.56). Carcass traits pertaining to weight and quality grade were deemed responsible for differences in net returns among cattle receiving different numbers of treatments after an initial diagnosis of BRD.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Differences in economic net returns and performance outcomes for feedlot cattle were determined on the basis of number of treatments after an initial diagnosis of BRD; the analysis accounted for the season of arrival, sex, and weight class.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Babcock's present address is Adams Land and Cattle Co, 327 S 1st Ave, Broken Bow, NE 68822.

Supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (grant No. 2007-35204-18320).

Address correspondence to Dr. White (bwhite@vet.k-state.edu).
  • 1. Griffin D, Perino L, Wittum T. Feedlot respiratory disease: cost, value of preventives and intervention, in Proceedings. 27th Annu Conf Am Assoc Bovine Pract 1995;157160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. USDA. Part III: health management and biosecurity in US feedlots, 1999. Fort Collins, Colo: UDSA, APHIS, Veterinary Services, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, National Animal Health Monitoring System, 2000. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/feedlot/downloads/feedlot99/Feed-lot99_dr_PartIII.pdf. Accessed Oct 15, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Griffin D. Economic impact associated with respiratory disease in beef cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1997; 13: 367377.

  • 4. White BJ, Anderson JD, Larson RL, et al. Review: the cow-calf operation retained ownership decision. Prof Anim Sci 2007; 23: 1828.

  • 5. White BJ, Anderson JD, McKinley WB, et al. Factor price disparity and retained ownership of feeder cattle: an application of feedlot and carcass performance data to farm-level decision making. J Agric Appl Econ 2007; 39: 87101.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Brooks KR, Raper KC, Ward CE, et al. Economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on feedlot cattle during backgrounding and finishing phases. Prof Anim Sci 2011; 27: 195203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Schneider MJ, Tait RG, Busby WD, et al. An evaluation of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle: impact on performance and carcass traits using treatment records and lung lesion scores. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 18211827.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Thompson PN, Stone A, Schiltheiss WA. Use of treatment records and lung lesion scoring to estimate the effect of respiratory disease on growth during early and late finishing periods in South African feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2006; 84: 488498.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Babcock AH, White BJ, Dritz SS, et al. Feedlot health and performance effects associated with the timing of respiratory disease treatment. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 314327.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Smith RA. North American cattle marketing and bovine respiratory disease (BRD). Anim Health Res Rev 2009; 10: 105108.

  • 11. Livestock Marketing Information Center website. Oklahoma City feeder & stocker cattle summary. Available at: www.lmic.info. Accessed Oct 13, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Dohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H. Confounding: detection and control. In: Veterinary epidemiologic research. 2nd ed. Charlottetown, PE, Canada: AVC Inc, 2009;271322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Busby D, Loy D. Called versus calculated yield grades. ISU beef research report. AS Leaflet R1730. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. USDA. Standards for grades of slaughter cattle and standards for grades of carcass beef. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Gardner BA, Dolezal HG, Bryant LK, et al. Health of finishing steers: effects on performance, carcass traits and meat tenderness. J Anim Sci 1999; 77: 31683175.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Roeber DL, Speer NC, Gentry JG, et al. Feeder cattle health management: effects on morbidity rates, feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and beef palatability. Prof Anim Sci 2001; 17: 3944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Lechtenberg KF, Smith RA, Stokka GL. Feedlot health and management. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1998; 14: 177197.

  • 18. Babcock AH, Renter DG, White BJ, et al. Temporal distributions of respiratory disease events within cohorts of feedlot cattle and associations with cattle health and performance indices. Prev Vet Med 2010; 97: 198219.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Eicher SD. Transportation of cattle in the dairy industry: current research and future directions. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84 (suppl): E19E23.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Swanson JC, Morrow-Tesch J. Cattle transport: historical, research, and future perspectives. J Anim Sci 2001; 79 (suppl E): E102E109.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Fulton RW, Cook BJ, Step DL, et al. Evaluation of health status of calves and the impact on feedlot performance: assessment of a retained ownership program for postweaning calves. Can J Vet Res 2002; 66: 173180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Ribble CS, Meek AH, Janzen ED, et al. Effect of time of year, weather, and the pattern of auction market sales on fatal fibrinous pneumonia (shipping fever) in calves in a large feedlot in Alberta (1985–1988). Can J Vet Res 1995; 59: 167172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Ribble CS, Meek AH, Shewen PE, et al. Effect of transportation on fatal fibrinous pneumonia and shrinkage in calves arriving at a large feedlot. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 612615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Cernicchiaro N, White BJ, Renter DG, et al. Associations between distance traveled and feedlot performance, mortality, and risk of respiratory disease. J Anim Sci 2012; 90: 19291939.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Loneragan GH, Dargatz DA, Morley PS, et al. Trends in mortality ratios among cattle in US feedlots. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219: 11221127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Nickell JS, White BJ. Metaphylactic antimicrobial therapy for bovine respiratory disease in stocker and feedlot cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2010; 26: 285301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. White BJ, Renter DG. Bayesian estimation of the performance of using clinical observations and harvest lung lesions for diagnosing bovine respiratory disease in post-weaned beef calves. J Vet Diagn Invest 2009; 21: 446453.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Larson RL. Effect of cattle disease on carcass traits. J Anim Sci 2005; 83 (suppl E): E37E43.

  • 29. Smith RA. Impact of disease on feedlot performance: a review. J Anim Sci 1998; 76: 272274.

  • 30. Bateman KG, Martin SW, Shewen PE, et al. An evaluation of antimicrobial therapy for undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease. Can Vet J 1990; 31: 689696.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Morck DW, Merrill JK, Thorlakson BE, et al. Prophylactic efficacy of tilmicosin for bovine respiratory tract disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 273277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Tatum JD, Platter WJ, Bargen JL, et al. Carcass-based measures of cattle performance and feeding probability. Prof Anim Sci 2012; 28: 173183.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Osterstock JB, MacDonald JC, Boggess MM, et al. Technical note: analysis of ordinal outcomes from carcass data in beef cattle research. J Anim Sci 2010; 88: 33843389.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement