Determination of the minimum anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane in thick-billed parrots (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha)

Kristen A. Phair Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Kristen A. Phair in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
R. Scott Larsen Denver Zoo, 2300 Steele St, Denver, CO 80205.

Search for other papers by R. Scott Larsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Raymund F. Wack Wildlife Health Center and Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Raymund F. Wack in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Yael Shilo-Benjamini Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Yael Shilo-Benjamini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Bruno H. Pypendop Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Bruno H. Pypendop in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DrMedVet, DrVetSci

Abstract

Objective—To determine the minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in thick-billed parrots (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) and compare MAC obtained via mechanical and electrical stimulation.

Animals—15 healthy thick-billed parrots.

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced in each parrot by administration of sevoflurane in oxygen. An end-tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2.5% was established in the first bird. Fifteen minutes was allowed for equilibration. Then, 2 types of noxious stimulation (mechanical and electrical) were applied; stimuli were separated by 15 minutes. Responses to stimuli were graded as positive or negative. For a positive or negative response to a stimulus, the target end-tidal sevoflurane concentration of the subsequent bird was increased or decreased by 10%, respectively. The MAC was calculated as the mean end-tidal sevoflurane concentration during crossover events, defined as instances in which independent pairs of birds evaluated in succession had opposite responses. A quantal method was used to determine sevoflurane MAC. Physiologic variables and arterial blood gas values were also measured.

Results—Via quantal analysis, mean sevoflurane MAC in thick-billed parrots determined with mechanical stimulation was 2.35% (90% fiducial interval, 1.32% to 2.66%), which differed significantly from the mean sevoflurane MAC determined with electrical stimulation, which was 4.24% (90% fiducial interval, 3.61% to 8.71%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Sevoflurane MAC in thick-billed parrots determined by mechanical stimulation was similar to values determined in chickens and mammals. Sevoflurane MAC determined by electrical stimulation was significantly higher, which suggested that the 2 types of stimulation did not induce similar results in thick-billed parrots.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in thick-billed parrots (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) and compare MAC obtained via mechanical and electrical stimulation.

Animals—15 healthy thick-billed parrots.

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced in each parrot by administration of sevoflurane in oxygen. An end-tidal sevoflurane concentration of 2.5% was established in the first bird. Fifteen minutes was allowed for equilibration. Then, 2 types of noxious stimulation (mechanical and electrical) were applied; stimuli were separated by 15 minutes. Responses to stimuli were graded as positive or negative. For a positive or negative response to a stimulus, the target end-tidal sevoflurane concentration of the subsequent bird was increased or decreased by 10%, respectively. The MAC was calculated as the mean end-tidal sevoflurane concentration during crossover events, defined as instances in which independent pairs of birds evaluated in succession had opposite responses. A quantal method was used to determine sevoflurane MAC. Physiologic variables and arterial blood gas values were also measured.

Results—Via quantal analysis, mean sevoflurane MAC in thick-billed parrots determined with mechanical stimulation was 2.35% (90% fiducial interval, 1.32% to 2.66%), which differed significantly from the mean sevoflurane MAC determined with electrical stimulation, which was 4.24% (90% fiducial interval, 3.61% to 8.71%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Sevoflurane MAC in thick-billed parrots determined by mechanical stimulation was similar to values determined in chickens and mammals. Sevoflurane MAC determined by electrical stimulation was significantly higher, which suggested that the 2 types of stimulation did not induce similar results in thick-billed parrots.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Phair's present address is Zoological Society of San Diego, POBox 120551, San Diego, CA 92112.

Supported by the Center for Companion Animal Health and the Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, and the Sacramento Zoological Society.

The authors thank Neil Willits and Chalon Majewski-Tiedeken for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Phair (kaphair@gmail.com).
  • 1.

    Lamberski NHealy S. The thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha). J Avian Med Surg 2002; 16:5052.

  • 2.

    Lamberski N. Thick-billed parrot species survival plan. Veterinary advisor report. Yulee, Fla: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Hawkins MGPascoe PJ. Bird anesthesia—cagebirds. In: West GHeard DCaulkett N, eds. Zoo animal & wildlife immobilization and anesthesia. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing, 2007:269297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sonner JM. Issues in the design and interpretation of minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) studies. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:609614.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Eger EI IISaidman LJBrandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: a standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology 1965; 26:756763.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Pavez JCHawkins MGPascoe PJ, et al. Effect of fentanyl target-controlled infusions on isoflurane minimum anaesthetic concentration and cardiovascular function in red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis). Vet Anaesth Analg 2011; 38:344351.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Mercado JALarsen RSWack RF, et al. Minimum anesthetic concentration of isoflurane in captive thick-billed parrots (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha). Am J Vet Res 2008; 69:189194.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Joyner PHJones MPWard D, et al. Induction and recovery characteristics and cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane in bald eagles. Am J Vet Res 2009; 69:1322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Quandt EGreenacre CB. Sevoflurane anesthesia in psittacines. J Zoo Wild Med 1999; 30:308309.

  • 10.

    Korbel R. Comparative investigations on inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane (Forene) and sevoflurane (SEVOrane) in racing pigeons (Columba livia Gmel., 1789, var. domestica) and presentation of a reference anesthesia protocol in birds. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 1998; 26:211223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Wallin RFRegan BMNapoli MD, et al. Sevoflurane: a new inhalational anesthetic agent. Anesth Analg 1975; 54:758766.

  • 12.

    Naganobu KFujisawa YOhde H, et al. Determination of the minimum anesthetic concentration and cardiovascular dose response for sevoflurane in chickens during controlled ventilation. Vet Surg 2000; 29:102105.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Barter LSIlkiw JESteffey EP, et al. Animal dependence of inhaled anesthetic requirements in cats. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:275277.

  • 14.

    Valverde AMorey TEHernandez J, et al. Validation of several types of noxious stimuli for use in determining the minimum alveolar concentration for inhalation anesthetics in dogs and rabbits. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64:957962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Laster MJLiu JEger EI II, et al. Electrical stimulation as a substitute for the tail clamp in the determination of minimum alveolar concentration. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:13101320.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Dixon WJ. The up-and-down method for small samples. Am Statist Assoc J 1965; 60:967978.

  • 17.

    Teare JA. Physiological reference values. Apple Valley, Minn: International Species Information System, 2002.

  • 18.

    Quasha ALEger EI IITinker JH. Determination and applications of MAC. Anesthesiology 1980; 53:315334.

  • 19.

    Eger EI IIJohnson BHWeiskopf RB, et al. Minimum alveolar concentration of I-653 and isoflurane in pigs: definition of a supramaximal stimulus. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:1174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Satas SHaaland KThoresen M, et al. MAC for halothane and isoflurane during normothermia and hypothermia in the newborn piglet. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40:452456.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Mazze RIRice SABaden JM. Halothane, isoflurane, and enflurane MAC in pregnant and nonpregnant female and male mice and rats. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:339341.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Aida HMizuno YHobo S, et al. Determination of the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and physical response to sevoflurane inhalation in horses. J Vet Med Sci 1994; 56:11611165.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Kazama TIkeda K. Comparison of MAC and the rate of rise of alveolar concentration of sevoflurane with halothane and isoflurane in the dog. Anesthesiology 1988; 68:435437.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Grubb TLSchlipf JWRiebold TW, et al. Minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in spontaneously breathing llamas and alpacas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223:11671169.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Kashimoto SFuruya ANonaka A, et al. The minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in rats. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1997; 14:359361.

  • 26.

    Bertelsen MFMosley CACrawshaw GJ, et al. Anesthetic potency of sevoflurane with and without nitrous oxide in mechanically ventilated Dumeril monitors. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227:575578.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Barter LSHawkins MGBrosnan RJ, et al. Median effective dose of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane in green iguanas. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67:392397.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Naganobu KIse KMiyamoto T, et al. Sevoflurane anaesthesia in chickens during spontaneous and controlled ventilation. Vet Rec 2003; 152:4548.

  • 29.

    Klaphake ESchumacher JGreenacre C, et al. Comparative anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of pre- versus post-operative butorphanol administration in Hispaniolan amazon parrots (Amazona ventralis) anesthetized with sevoflurane. J Avian Med Surg 2006; 20:27.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Cullen DJEger EI II. The effect of extreme hypocapnia on the anaesthetic requirement (MAC) of dogs. Br J Anaesth 1971; 43:339343.

Advertisement