Diagnosis of lameness in dogs by use of artificial neural networks and ground reaction forces obtained during gait analysis

Makiko Kaijima Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Makiko Kaijima in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Timothy L. Foutz Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Timothy L. Foutz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, PE
,
Ronald W. McClendon Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences and Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Ronald W. McClendon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Steven C. Budsberg Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Steven C. Budsberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the accuracy of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for use in predicting subjective diagnostic scores of lameness with variables determined from ground reaction force (GRF) data.

Animals—21 adult mixed-breed dogs.

Procedures—The left cranial cruciate ligament of each dog was transected to induce osteoarthritis of the stifle joint as part of another study. Lameness scores were assigned and GRF data were collected 2 times before and 5 times after ligament transection. Inputs and the output for each ANN were GRF variables and a lameness score, respectively. The ANNs were developed by use of data from 14 dogs and evaluated by use of data for the remaining 7 dogs (ie, dogs not used in model development).

Results—ANN models developed with 2 preferred input variables had an overall accuracy ranging from 96% to 99% for 2 data configurations (data configuration 1 contained patterns or observations for 7 dogs, whereas data configuration 2 contained patterns or observations for 7 other dogs). When additional variables were added to the models, the highest overall accuracy ranged from 97% to 100%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—ANNs provided a method for processing GRF data of dogs to accurately predict subjective diagnostic scores of lameness. Processing of GRF data via ANNs could result in a more precise evaluation of surgical and pharmacological intervention by detecting subtle lameness that could have been missed by visual analysis of GRF curves.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the accuracy of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for use in predicting subjective diagnostic scores of lameness with variables determined from ground reaction force (GRF) data.

Animals—21 adult mixed-breed dogs.

Procedures—The left cranial cruciate ligament of each dog was transected to induce osteoarthritis of the stifle joint as part of another study. Lameness scores were assigned and GRF data were collected 2 times before and 5 times after ligament transection. Inputs and the output for each ANN were GRF variables and a lameness score, respectively. The ANNs were developed by use of data from 14 dogs and evaluated by use of data for the remaining 7 dogs (ie, dogs not used in model development).

Results—ANN models developed with 2 preferred input variables had an overall accuracy ranging from 96% to 99% for 2 data configurations (data configuration 1 contained patterns or observations for 7 dogs, whereas data configuration 2 contained patterns or observations for 7 other dogs). When additional variables were added to the models, the highest overall accuracy ranged from 97% to 100%.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—ANNs provided a method for processing GRF data of dogs to accurately predict subjective diagnostic scores of lameness. Processing of GRF data via ANNs could result in a more precise evaluation of surgical and pharmacological intervention by detecting subtle lameness that could have been missed by visual analysis of GRF curves.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Foutz (tfoutz@uga.edu).
  • 1. Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Brown J, et al. Vertical loading rates in clinically normal dogs at trot. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56:12751280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J, et al. Use of force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57:389393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Cross AR, Budsberg SC, Keefe TJ. Kinetic gait analysis assessment of meloxicam efficacy in a sodium urate–induced synovitis model in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58:626631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. DeCamp CE. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis and the assessment of lameness in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27:825840.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. McLaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31:193201.

  • 6. Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW, et al. Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49:15221524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Budsberg SC, Decamp CEJevens DJ, et al. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:15691574.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Begg RK. Neural network-based prediction of missing key features in vertical GRF–time recordings. J Med Eng Technol 2006; 30:315322.

  • 9. Barton JG, Lees A. An application of neural networks for distinguishing gait patterns on the basis of hip-knee joint angle diagrams. Gait Posture 1997; 5:2833.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Su FC, Wu WL. Design and testing of a genetic algorithm neural network in the assessment of gait patterns. Med Eng Phys 2000; 22:6774.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Chau T. A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: neural network and wavelet methods. Gait Posture 2001; 13:102120.

  • 12. Wu WL, Su FC, Cheng YM, et al. Potential of the genetic algorithm neural network in the assessment of gait patterns in ankle arthrodesis. Ann Biomed Eng 2001; 29:8391.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Schobesberger H, Peham C. Computerized detection of supporting forelimb lameness in the horse using an artificial neural network. Vet J 2002; 163:7784.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Keegan KG, Arafat S, Skubic M, et al. Detection of lameness and determination of the affected forelimb in horses by use of continuous wavelet transformation and neural network classification of kinematic data. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64:13761381.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Schöllhorn WI. Applications of artificial neural nets in clinical biomechanics. Clin Biomech 2004; 19:876898.

  • 16. Hahn ME, Farley AM, Lin V, et al. Neural network estimation of balance control during locomotion. J Biomech 2005; 38:717724.

  • 17. Lafuente R, Belda JM, Sánchez-Lacuesta J, et al. Design and test of neural networks and statistical classifiers in computer-aided movement analysis: a case study on gait analysis. Clin Biomech 1998; 13:216229.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Agnello KA, Trumble TN, Chambers JN, et al. The effects of zoledronate on markers of bone metabolism and subchondral bone mineral density in dogs with experimentally induced cruciate-deficient osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66:14871495.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Brouwer RK. A method for training recurrent neural networks for classification by building basins for attraction. Neural Netw 1995; 8:597603.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. O'Connor BL, Visco DM, Heck DA, et al. Gait alterations in dogs after transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32:11421147.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM, et al. Redistribution of vertical ground reaction force to dogs with experimentally induced chronic hind limb lameness. Vet Surg 1995; 24:384389.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Budsberg SC. Long-term temporal evaluation of ground reaction forces during development of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:12071211.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement