Evaluation of long-term glucose homeostasis in lean and obese cats by use of continuous glucose monitoring

Margarethe Hoenig Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Margarethe Hoenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet, PhD
,
Nicole Pach Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Nicole Pach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Karl Thomaseth Institute of Biomedical Engineering ISIB CNR – National Research Council of Italy, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova, Italy.

Search for other papers by Karl Thomaseth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr Ing, PhD
,
Frerich DeVries Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Binger Strasse 173, 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.

Search for other papers by Frerich DeVries in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet
, and
Duncan C. Ferguson Department of Comparative Bioscience, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Duncan C. Ferguson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate intraday and interday variations in glucose concentrations in cats and to test the utility of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS).

Animals—6 lean and 8 long-term (> 5 years) obese cats.

Procedures—Blood glucose concentrations were measured during the course of 156 hours by use of a laboratory hexokinase-based reference method and a handheld glucometer. Interstitial glucose concentrations were evaluated with a CGMS.

Results—Paired measures of glucose concentrations obtained with the CGMS typically were marginally higher than concentrations for the reference method and less biased than concentrations obtained with the glucometer. This was partially confirmed by the concordance correlation coefficients of the concentration for the CGMS or glucometer versus the concentration for the reference method, although the correlation coefficients were not significantly different. Mean ± SD area under the curve for the glucose concentration (AUCG) did not differ significantly between lean (14.0 ± 0.5 g/dL•h) and obese (15.2 + 0.5 g/dL•h) cats during the 156-hour period, but one of the obese cats had a much higher AUCG. Within-day glucose variability was small in both lean and obese cats.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Glucose homeostasis was maintained, even in long-term obese cats, and intraday glucose fluctuations were small. One obese cat might have been classified as prediabetic on the basis of the AUCG, which was approximately 25% higher than that of the other obese and lean cats. The CGMS can be useful in the evaluation of long-term effects of drugs or diet on glucose homeostasis in cats.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate intraday and interday variations in glucose concentrations in cats and to test the utility of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS).

Animals—6 lean and 8 long-term (> 5 years) obese cats.

Procedures—Blood glucose concentrations were measured during the course of 156 hours by use of a laboratory hexokinase-based reference method and a handheld glucometer. Interstitial glucose concentrations were evaluated with a CGMS.

Results—Paired measures of glucose concentrations obtained with the CGMS typically were marginally higher than concentrations for the reference method and less biased than concentrations obtained with the glucometer. This was partially confirmed by the concordance correlation coefficients of the concentration for the CGMS or glucometer versus the concentration for the reference method, although the correlation coefficients were not significantly different. Mean ± SD area under the curve for the glucose concentration (AUCG) did not differ significantly between lean (14.0 ± 0.5 g/dL•h) and obese (15.2 + 0.5 g/dL•h) cats during the 156-hour period, but one of the obese cats had a much higher AUCG. Within-day glucose variability was small in both lean and obese cats.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Glucose homeostasis was maintained, even in long-term obese cats, and intraday glucose fluctuations were small. One obese cat might have been classified as prediabetic on the basis of the AUCG, which was approximately 25% higher than that of the other obese and lean cats. The CGMS can be useful in the evaluation of long-term effects of drugs or diet on glucose homeostasis in cats.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 98 0 0
Full Text Views 690 374 23
PDF Downloads 343 162 4
Advertisement