Ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics and oral absorption of generic ciprofloxacin tablets in dogs

Mark G. Papich Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Mark G. Papich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in dogs, including oral absorption following administration of generic ciprofloxacin tablets.

Animals—6 healthy Beagles.

Procedures—In a crossover study design, ciprofloxacin was administered as a generic tablet (250 mg, PO; mean dose, 23 mg/kg) and solution (10 mg/kg, IV) to 6 dogs. In a separate experiment, 4 of the dogs received ciprofloxacin solution (10 mg/mL) PO via stomach tube (total dose, 250 mg). Blood samples were collected before (time 0) and for 24 hours after each dose. Plasma concentrations were analyzed with high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by means of compartmental modeling.

Results—When ciprofloxacin was administered as tablets PO, peak plasma concentration was 4.4 μg/mL (coefficient of variation [CV], 55.9%), terminal half-life (t1/2) was 2.6 hours (CV, 10.8%), area under the time-concentration curve was 22.5 μg•h/mL (CV, 62.3%), and systemic absorption was 58.4% (CV, 45.4%). For the dose administered IV, t1/2 was 3.7 hours (CV, 52.3%), clearance was 0.588 L/kg/h (CV, 33.9%), and volume of distribution was 2.39 L/kg (CV, 23.7%). After PO administration as a solution versus IV administration, plasma concentrations were more uniform and consistent among dogs, with absorption of 71% (CV, 7.3%), t1/2 of 3.1 hours (CV, 18.6%), and peak plasma concentration of 4.67 μg/mL (CV, 17.6%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Inconsistent oral absorption of ciprofloxacin in some dogs may be formulation dependent and affected by tablet dissolution in the small intestine. Because of the wide range in oral absorption of tablets, the dose needed to reach the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target concentration in this study ranged from 12 to 52 mg/kg (CV, 102%), with a mean dose of 25 mg/kg, once daily, for bacteria with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤ 0.25 μg/mL.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in dogs, including oral absorption following administration of generic ciprofloxacin tablets.

Animals—6 healthy Beagles.

Procedures—In a crossover study design, ciprofloxacin was administered as a generic tablet (250 mg, PO; mean dose, 23 mg/kg) and solution (10 mg/kg, IV) to 6 dogs. In a separate experiment, 4 of the dogs received ciprofloxacin solution (10 mg/mL) PO via stomach tube (total dose, 250 mg). Blood samples were collected before (time 0) and for 24 hours after each dose. Plasma concentrations were analyzed with high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by means of compartmental modeling.

Results—When ciprofloxacin was administered as tablets PO, peak plasma concentration was 4.4 μg/mL (coefficient of variation [CV], 55.9%), terminal half-life (t1/2) was 2.6 hours (CV, 10.8%), area under the time-concentration curve was 22.5 μg•h/mL (CV, 62.3%), and systemic absorption was 58.4% (CV, 45.4%). For the dose administered IV, t1/2 was 3.7 hours (CV, 52.3%), clearance was 0.588 L/kg/h (CV, 33.9%), and volume of distribution was 2.39 L/kg (CV, 23.7%). After PO administration as a solution versus IV administration, plasma concentrations were more uniform and consistent among dogs, with absorption of 71% (CV, 7.3%), t1/2 of 3.1 hours (CV, 18.6%), and peak plasma concentration of 4.67 μg/mL (CV, 17.6%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Inconsistent oral absorption of ciprofloxacin in some dogs may be formulation dependent and affected by tablet dissolution in the small intestine. Because of the wide range in oral absorption of tablets, the dose needed to reach the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target concentration in this study ranged from 12 to 52 mg/kg (CV, 102%), with a mean dose of 25 mg/kg, once daily, for bacteria with a minimum inhibitory concentration ≤ 0.25 μg/mL.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Papich has received honoraria for speaking at conferences, payment for consulting, gifts, and research support from Bayer Healthcare.

The author thanks Delta R. Dise for assistance with the drug analysis, Daria DiGiovanni for assistance with sample collection, and Dr. Marilyn Martinez for assistance with study design.

Address correspondence to Dr. Papich (mark_papich@ncsu.edu).
  • 1. Abadía AR, Aramayona JJ, Muñoz MJ, et al. Ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in dogs following oral administration. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1995; 42:505511.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Abadía AR, Aramayona JJ, Muñoz MJ, et al. Disposition of ciprofloxacin following intravenous administration in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1994; 17:384388.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Walker RD, Stein GE, Hauptman JG, et al. Serum and tissue cage fluid concentrations of ciprofloxacin after oral administration of the drug to healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1990; 51:896900.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Nakamura S, Kurobe N, Ohue T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a novel quinolone, AT-4140, in animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:8993.

  • 5. Papich MG, Riviere JE. Chapter 38. Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drugs. In: Riviere JE, Papich MG, eds. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2009;1524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Plaisance KI, Drusano GL, Forrest A, et al. Effect of dose size on bioavailability of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:956958.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Khan MK, Khan MF, Khan H, et al. Bioavailability of ciprofloxacin tablets in humans and its correlation with the dissolution rates. Pak J Pharm Sci 2009; 22:329334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Albarellos GA, Kreil VE, Landoni MF. Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after single intravenous and repeat oral administration to cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2004; 27:155162.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Yamarik TA, Wilson WD, Wiebe VJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of ciprofloxacin in adult horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2010; 33:587594.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Plumb DC. Plumb's veterinary drug handbook. 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing, 2008;1120.

  • 11. Papich MG. Saunders handbook of veterinary drugs. 3rd ed. St Louis: Elsevier-Saunders, 2011;858.

  • 12. Bidgood T, Papich MG. Plasma and interstitial fluid pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin, its metabolite ciprofloxacin, and marbofloxacin after oral administration and a constant rate intravenous infusion in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005; 28:329341.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Davis JL, Foster DM, Papich MG. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite ciprofloxacin in calves. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2007; 30:564571.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. United States Pharmacopeia (USP-NF). USP34-NF29. General chapter on validation of compendial procedures <1225>. Rockville, Md: United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T. Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1978; 6:165175.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1982.

  • 17. Shaheen BW, Boothe DM, Oyarzabal OA, et al. Evaluation of the contribution of gyrA mutation and efflux pumps to fluoroquinolone and multidrug resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from dogs and cats. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72:2532.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Jensen US, Muller A, Brandt CT, et al. Effect of generics on price and consumption of ciprofloxacin in primary healthcare: the relationship to increasing resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65:12861291.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Martinez MN, Papich MG. Factors influencing the gastric residence of dosage forms in dogs. J Pharm Sci 2009; 98:844860.

  • 20. Overholser BR, Kays MB, Forrest A, et al. Sex-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of oral ciprofloxacin. J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 44:10121022.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Kasim NA, Whitehouse M, Ramachandran C, et al. Molecular properties of WHO essential drugs and provisional biopharmaceutical classification. Mol Pharm 2004; 1:8596.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Stahlmann R, Kühner S, Shakibaei M, et al. Chondrotoxicity of ciprofloxacin in immature Beagle dogs: immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy and drug plasma concentrations. Arch Toxicol 2000; 73:564572.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Shugarts S, Benet LZ. The role of transporters in the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs. Pharm Res 2009; 26:20392054.

  • 24. Ashby J, Piddock LJV, Wise R. An investigation of the hydrophobicity of the quinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother 1985; 16:805808.

  • 25. Wu CY, Benet LZ. Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system. Pharm Res 2005; 22:1123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Žakelj S, Šturm K, Kristl A. Ciprofloxacin permeability and its active secretion through rat small intestine in vitro. Int J Pharm 2006; 313:175180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. AliAbadi FS, Lees P. Antibiotic treatment for animals: effect on bacterial population and dosage regimen optimization. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 14:307313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Andes D, Craig WA. Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002; 19:261268.

  • 29. Drusano GL. Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of ‘bug and drug’. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:289300.

  • 30. McKellar QA, Sanchez Bruni SF, Jones DG. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of antimicrobial drugs used in veterinary medicine. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2004; 27:503514.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Zelenitsky SA, Ariano RE. Support for higher ciprofloxacin AUC24/MIC targets in treating Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65:17251732.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement