Evaluation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in experimentally inoculated sheep and determination of Anaplasma spp seroprevalence in 8 free-ranging sheep flocks in California and Oregon

Jennifer K. Gorman Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Jennifer K. Gorman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Bruce R. Hoar Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Bruce R. Hoar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Nathan C. Nieto Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Nathan C. Nieto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Janet E. Foley Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Janet E. Foley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate disease progression in sheep experimentally inoculated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and determine the Anaplasma spp seroprevalence in sheep in free-ranging flocks in the Sierra Nevada foothills and Oregon Coast Range.

Animals—10 mature ewes seronegative for Anaplasma spp and 251 sheep from 8 flocks.

Procedures—10 ewes received 1 of 3 treatments: A phagocytophilum Webster strain (n = 4), A phagocytophilum MRK strain (4), or human promyelocytic leukemia cells (control treatment [2]). Sheep were monitored for signs of clinical disease, and blood samples were obtained for serologic and PCR assay evaluation intermittently for 48 days. From a subsample of sheep from each of 8 free-ranging flocks, blood samples were obtained to determine Anaplasma spp seroprevalence.

Results—Sheep inoculated with A phagocytophilum developed subclinical or mild disease, whereas sheep inoculated with the control treatment did not develop any signs of disease. Only 2 ewes seroconverted; both had received the MRK strain. Anaplasma-specific DNA was detected in blood samples from 1 sheep in the Webster strain–inoculated group and 3 sheep in the MRK strain–inoculated group. Sheep seropositive for Anaplasma spp were detected in 5 of 8 flocks, and flocks in the Sierra Nevada foothills had higher within-flock seroprevalence (22%) than did flocks in the Oregon Coast Range (6.4%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Infection with A phagocytophilum in mature sheep generally resulted in subclinical disease. Higher Anaplasma spp seroprevalence in sheep in the Sierra Nevada foothills corresponded to the geographic distribution of anaplasmosis reported for dogs, horses, and humans.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate disease progression in sheep experimentally inoculated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and determine the Anaplasma spp seroprevalence in sheep in free-ranging flocks in the Sierra Nevada foothills and Oregon Coast Range.

Animals—10 mature ewes seronegative for Anaplasma spp and 251 sheep from 8 flocks.

Procedures—10 ewes received 1 of 3 treatments: A phagocytophilum Webster strain (n = 4), A phagocytophilum MRK strain (4), or human promyelocytic leukemia cells (control treatment [2]). Sheep were monitored for signs of clinical disease, and blood samples were obtained for serologic and PCR assay evaluation intermittently for 48 days. From a subsample of sheep from each of 8 free-ranging flocks, blood samples were obtained to determine Anaplasma spp seroprevalence.

Results—Sheep inoculated with A phagocytophilum developed subclinical or mild disease, whereas sheep inoculated with the control treatment did not develop any signs of disease. Only 2 ewes seroconverted; both had received the MRK strain. Anaplasma-specific DNA was detected in blood samples from 1 sheep in the Webster strain–inoculated group and 3 sheep in the MRK strain–inoculated group. Sheep seropositive for Anaplasma spp were detected in 5 of 8 flocks, and flocks in the Sierra Nevada foothills had higher within-flock seroprevalence (22%) than did flocks in the Oregon Coast Range (6.4%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Infection with A phagocytophilum in mature sheep generally resulted in subclinical disease. Higher Anaplasma spp seroprevalence in sheep in the Sierra Nevada foothills corresponded to the geographic distribution of anaplasmosis reported for dogs, horses, and humans.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Nieto's present address is Department of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Natural Resources, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89957.

Supported by the University of California-Davis Center for Food Animal Health.

The authors thank Joy Worth and Dan Rejmanek for laboratory assistance, Nat Lim for technical assistance, and Dana Van Liew and Greg Ahart for assistance with the animals.

Address correspondence to Dr. Foley (jefoley@ucdavis.edu).
  • 1. Foley J, Biberstein E. Anaplasmataceae. In: Hirsh DC, ed. Veterinary microbiology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Scientific, 2004;257259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Granquist EG, Stuen S, Lundgren AM, et al. Outer membrane protein sequence variation in lambs experimentally infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Infect Immun 2008; 76:120126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Stuen S, Bergstrom K, Schouls L. Sjodogg (tick-borne fever)—a historical review. Norsk Vet Tidsskr 1998; 110:703706.

  • 4. Dumler JS, Choi KS, Garcia-Garcia JC, et al. Human granulocytic anaplasmosis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:18281834.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Foley JE, Foley P, Brown RN, et al. Ecology of granulocytic ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease in the western United States. J Vector Ecol 2004; 29:4150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Greig B, Asanovich KM, Armstrong PJ, et al. Geographic, clinical, serologic, and molecular evidence of granulocytic ehrlichiosis, a likely zoonotic disease, in Minnesota and Wisconsin dogs. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:4448.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Madigan J. Equine ehrlichiosis. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1993; 9:423428.

  • 8. Hoar BR, Nieto NC, Rhodes DM, et al. Evaluation of sequential coinfection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma marginale in cattle. Am J Vet Res 2008; 69:11711178.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Dugan VG, Yabsley MJ, Tate CM, et al. Evaluation of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) as natural sentinels for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2006; 6:192207.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Rainwater KK, Ijdo J, Capuano A, et al. Serosurveillance for Anaplasma phagocytophilum antibodies in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Iowa, USA. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2006; 6:275282.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Veronesi F, Galuppi R, Tampieri MP, et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in fallow deer (Dama dama) and feeding ticks from an Italy preserve. Res Vet Sci 2011; 90:4043.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Stuen S, Moum T, Bernhoft A, et al. A paretic condition in an Anaplasma phagocytophilum infected roe deer calf. J Wildl Dis 2006; 42:170174.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Foley J, Biberstein E, Hirsh DC. Rickettsial agents of animal disease; the Rickettsiae. In: Hirsh DC, MacLachlan NJ, Walker RL, eds. Veterinary microbiology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Scientific, 2004;250252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Behymer DE, Riemann HP, Utterback W, et al. Mass screening of cattle sera against 14 infectious disease agents, using an ELISA system for monitoring health in livestock. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52:16991705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Maas J. Anaplasmosis. Fact sheet No. 1. Davis, Calif: University of California Cooperative Extension, 2003.

  • 16. Kuttler K. Anaplasma infections in wild and domestic ruminants: a review. J Wildl Dis 1984; 20:1220.

  • 17. Splitter EJ, Anthony HD, Twiehaus MJ. Anaplasma ovis in the United States: experimental studies with sheep and goats. Am J Vet Res 1956; 17:487491.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. California Department of Food and Agriculture. California agricultural resource directory 2008–2009. Sacramento, Calif: California Department of Food and Agriculture, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Asanovich KM, Bakken JS, Madigan JE, et al. Antigenic diversity of granulocytic Ehrlichia isolates from humans in Wisconsin and New York and a horse in California. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:10291034.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Dumler SJ, Asanovich KM, Bakken JS, et al. Serologic cross-reactions among Ehrlichia equi, Ehrlichia phagocytophila, and human granulocytic ehrlichia. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:10981103.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Drazenovich NL, Brown RN, Foley JE. Use of real-time quantitative PCR targeting the msp2 protein gene to identify cryptic Anaplasma phagocytophilum infections in wildlife and domestic animals. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2006; 6:8390.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. de la Fuente J, Van Den Bussche RA, Garcia-Garcia JC, et al. Phylogeography of New World isolates of Anaplasma marginale based on major surface protein sequences. Vet Microbiol 2002; 88:275285.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Haigh JC, Gerwing V, Erdenebaatar J, et al. A novel clinical syndrome and detection of Anaplasma ovis in Mongolian reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). J Wildl Dis 2008; 44:569577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Foggie A. Studies on the infectious agent of tick-borne fever in sheep. J Pathol Bacteriol 1951; 63:115.

  • 25. Stuen S, Engvall EO, Artursson K. Persistence of Ehrlichia phagocytophila infection in lambs in relation to clinical parameters and antibody responses. Vet Rec 1998; 143:553555.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Stuen S, Grova L, Granquist EG, et al. A comparative study of clinical manifestations, haematological and serological responses after experimental infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in two Norwegian sheep breeds. Acta Vet Scand 2011; 53:8.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Remy V, Hansmann Y, Martino SD, et al. Human anaplasmosis presenting as atypical pneumonitis in France. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37:846848.

  • 28. Foley J, Leutenegger C, Dumler J, et al. Evidence for modulated immune response to Anaplasma phagocytophila sensu lato in cats with FIV-induced immunosuppression. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 26:103113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Dumler JS, Bakken JS. Human ehrlichioses: newly recognized infections transmitted by ticks. Annu Rev Med 1998; 49:201213.

  • 30. Nuttall PA, Labuda M. Tick-host interactions: saliva-activated transmission. Parasitology 2004; 129(suppl):S177S189.

  • 31. Swai E, Karimuribo E, Ogden N, et al. Seroprevalence estimation and risk factors for A. marginale on smallholder dairy farms in Tanzania. Trop Anim Health Prod 2005; 37:599610.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Madigan JE, Hietala A, Chambers S. Seroepidemiologic survey of antibodies to Ehrlichia equi in horses in northern California. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990; 196:19621964.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Foley JE, Foley P, Madigan JE. Spatial distribution of seropositivity to the causative agent of granulocytic ehrlichiosis in dogs in California. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:15991605.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Dreher UM, de la Fuente J, Hofmann-Lehmann R, et al. Serologic cross-reactivity between Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005; 12:11771183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Stuen S. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—the most widespread tick-borne infection in animals in Europe. Vet Res Commun 2007; 31:7984.

Advertisement