Efficacy of vaccination of cattle with the Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjoprajitno component of a pentavalent Leptospira bacterin against experimental challenge with Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis

Carol L. Rinehart Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Incorporated, 2621 N Belt Hwy, St Joseph, MO 64506.

Search for other papers by Carol L. Rinehart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Alicia D. Zimmerman Rural Technologies Incorporated, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Alicia D. Zimmerman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Robin E. Buterbaugh Rural Technologies Incorporated, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Robin E. Buterbaugh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Rika A. Jolie Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Incorporated, 2621 N Belt Hwy, St Joseph, MO 64506.

Search for other papers by Rika A. Jolie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, MBA
, and
Christopher C. L. Chase Rural Technologies Incorporated, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Science, College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.

Search for other papers by Christopher C. L. Chase in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of vaccination with the Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjoprajitno component of a pentavalent Leptospira bacterin against a virulent experimental challenge with Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203 in cattle.

Animals—Fifty-five 6-month-old Holstein heifers.

Procedures—Heifers that were negative for persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus determined via immunohistochemical testing and negative for Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona, Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo, Leptospira interrogans serovar grippotyphosa, Leptospira interrogans serovar bratislava, Leptospira interrogans serovar canicola, and Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae determined via microscopic agglutination assay were enrolled in the study. Two heifers were separated and used for the challenge passage. The remaining heifers were vaccinated twice with a commercial pentavalent bacterin or a sham vaccine 21 days apart and subsequently challenged with L borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203. Urinary shedding, antibody titers, and clinical signs of leptospirosis infection were recorded for 8 weeks after challenge.

Results—Heifers that received the pentavalent bacterin did not shed the organism in urine after challenge and did not have renal colonization at necropsy. Heifers that were sham vaccinated shed the organism in urine and had renal colonization.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results provided evidence that a pentavalent Leptospira vaccine containing L interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjoprajitno can provide protection against challenge with L borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203. It is important to demonstrate cross-protection that is vaccine specific against disease-causing strains of organisms that are prevalent under field conditions.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of vaccination with the Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjoprajitno component of a pentavalent Leptospira bacterin against a virulent experimental challenge with Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203 in cattle.

Animals—Fifty-five 6-month-old Holstein heifers.

Procedures—Heifers that were negative for persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus determined via immunohistochemical testing and negative for Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona, Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo, Leptospira interrogans serovar grippotyphosa, Leptospira interrogans serovar bratislava, Leptospira interrogans serovar canicola, and Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae determined via microscopic agglutination assay were enrolled in the study. Two heifers were separated and used for the challenge passage. The remaining heifers were vaccinated twice with a commercial pentavalent bacterin or a sham vaccine 21 days apart and subsequently challenged with L borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203. Urinary shedding, antibody titers, and clinical signs of leptospirosis infection were recorded for 8 weeks after challenge.

Results—Heifers that received the pentavalent bacterin did not shed the organism in urine after challenge and did not have renal colonization at necropsy. Heifers that were sham vaccinated shed the organism in urine and had renal colonization.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results provided evidence that a pentavalent Leptospira vaccine containing L interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjoprajitno can provide protection against challenge with L borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis strain 203. It is important to demonstrate cross-protection that is vaccine specific against disease-causing strains of organisms that are prevalent under field conditions.

Contributor Notes

The authors thank Tanya Triebwasser, Devan Schomp, Kayla Behrens, Lucinda Bloker, Kysa Gilkerson, Marie Loughin, and Dr. George Milliken for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Jolie (rika.jolie@boehringer-ingelheim.com).
  • 1.

    Faine S, Adler B, Bolin CA, et al. Leptospira and leptospirosis. 2nd ed. Melbourne MediSci Press, 1999.

  • 2.

    Heath S, Johnson R. Leptospirosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205:15181523.

  • 3.

    Ellis WA. Leptospirosis as a cause of reproductive failure. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1994; 10:463478.

  • 4.

    Bolin CA, Thiermann AB, Handsaker AL, et al. Effect of vaccination with a pentavalent leptospiral vaccine on Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis infection of pregnant cattle. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:161165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Bolin CA, Zuerner RL, Trueba G. Effect of vaccination with a pentavalent leptospiral vaccine containing Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis on type hardjo-bovis infection of cattle. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:20042008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Bolin CA, Cassells JA, Zuerner RL, et al. Effect of vaccination with a monovalent Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis vaccine on type hardjo-bovis infection of cattle. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52:16391643.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Trueba GA, Bolin CA, Thoen CO. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of bovine leptospirosis caused by Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis. J Vet Diagn Invest 1990; 2:323329.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Bolin CA, Alt DP. Use of a monovalent leptopsiral vaccine to prevent renal colonization and urinary shedding in cattle exposed to Leptospria borpetersenii serovar hardjo. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:9951000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Jost BH, Adler B, Vihn T, et al. A monoclonal antibody reacting with a determinant on leptospiral lipopolysaccharide protects guinea pigs against leptospirosis. J Med Microbiol 1986; 22:269275.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Masuzawa T, Nakamura R, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Immunological reactivity and passive protective activity of monoclonal antibodies against protective antigen (PAg) of Leptospira interrogans serovarlai. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1990; 272:328336.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Naiman BM, Alt D, Bolin CA, et al. Protective killed Leptospira borpetersenii vaccine induces potent Th1 immunity comprising responses by CD4 and gδ T lymphocytes. Infect Immun 2001; 69:75507558.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Naiman BM, Blumerman S, Alt D, et al. Evaluation of type 1 immune response in naive and vaccinated animals following challenge with Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo: involvement of WC1+ and CD4 T cells. Infect Immun 2002; 70:61476157.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Ellis WA, Thiermann AB, Marshall RB. Genotypes of Leptospira hardjo and their role in clinical disease, in Proceedings. 14th World Cong Dis Cattle 1986;966970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Djordjevic S, Hornitzky M, Ross AD, et al. Restriction endonuclease analysis of Australian isolate of Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo from cattle with agalactia and abortion. Aust Vet J 1993; 70:98100.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Thiermann AB, Handaker AL, Foly JW, et al. Reclassification of North American leptospiral isolates belonging to serogroups Mini and Sejroe by restriction endonuclease analysis. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47:6166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Skilbeck NW, Davies WD. Restriction endonuclease analysis of Australian isolates of Leptospira interrogans serovarhardjo. Aust Vet J 1989; 66:183184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement