Effect of environmental conditions on degree of hoof wall hydration in horses

Brian A. Hampson Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Search for other papers by Brian A. Hampson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Melody A. de Laat Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Search for other papers by Melody A. de Laat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Paul C. Mills Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Search for other papers by Paul C. Mills in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
, and
Chris C. Pollitt Australian Brumby Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Search for other papers by Chris C. Pollitt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine the effect of various environmental conditions on the degree of hydration in hoof wall horn tissue from feral horses and investigate the effect of short-term foot soaking on moisture content in hoof wall and sole tissue in domestic horses.

Animals—40 feral horses from 3 environments (wet and boggy [n = 10], partially flooded [20], and constantly dry desert [10]) and 6 nonferal Quarter Horses.

Procedures—The percentage of moisture content of hoof wall samples from feral horses was measured in vitro. In a separate evaluation, the percentage of moisture content of hoof wall and sole tissue was measured in the dry and soaked forefeet of Quarter Horses.

Results—Mean ± SD percentage of moisture content was 29.6 ± 5.1%, 29.5 ± 5.8%, and 29.5 ± 2.9% for feral horses from the wet and boggy, partially flooded, and constantly dry desert environments, respectively. Moisture content did not differ among the 3 groups, nor did it differ between dry and soaked hoof wall samples from nonferal horses. However, soaking in water for 2 hours resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of moisture content of the sole.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Environmental conditions do not appear to affect moisture content in the hoof wall horn. Soaking horses' feet regularly in water would be unlikely to change the degree of hydration in the hoof wall horn but may further hydrate the sole.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the effect of various environmental conditions on the degree of hydration in hoof wall horn tissue from feral horses and investigate the effect of short-term foot soaking on moisture content in hoof wall and sole tissue in domestic horses.

Animals—40 feral horses from 3 environments (wet and boggy [n = 10], partially flooded [20], and constantly dry desert [10]) and 6 nonferal Quarter Horses.

Procedures—The percentage of moisture content of hoof wall samples from feral horses was measured in vitro. In a separate evaluation, the percentage of moisture content of hoof wall and sole tissue was measured in the dry and soaked forefeet of Quarter Horses.

Results—Mean ± SD percentage of moisture content was 29.6 ± 5.1%, 29.5 ± 5.8%, and 29.5 ± 2.9% for feral horses from the wet and boggy, partially flooded, and constantly dry desert environments, respectively. Moisture content did not differ among the 3 groups, nor did it differ between dry and soaked hoof wall samples from nonferal horses. However, soaking in water for 2 hours resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of moisture content of the sole.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Environmental conditions do not appear to affect moisture content in the hoof wall horn. Soaking horses' feet regularly in water would be unlikely to change the degree of hydration in the hoof wall horn but may further hydrate the sole.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Hampson (b.hampson1@uq.edu.au).
  • 1.

    Zschokke E. Über das Absorptionsvermögel des Hornes und über die Hufsalben. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1885; 4:151165.

  • 2.

    Ley WB, Scott Pleasant R, Dunnington EA. Effects of season and diet on tensile strength and mineral content of the equine hoof wall. Equine Vet J Suppl 1998;(26):4650.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Hinterhofer C, Stanek C & Binder K. Elastic modulus of equine hoof horn, tested in wall samples, sole samples and frog samples at varying levels of moisture. Berlin Münch Tierärztl Wochensch 1998; 111:217221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Strasser H. Holistic treatment of horse hooves. In: Pferdehufe ganzheitlich behandeln: gesunde Hufe am gesunden Pferd. Stuttgart, Germany: Sonntag Verlag GmbH, 2004;115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Booth L & White D. Pathological conditions of the external hoof capsule. In: Floyd AE, Mansmann RA, eds. Equine podiatry. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2007;240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Kempson SA, Campbell EH. A permeability barrier in the dorsal hoof wall of the equine hoof capsule. Equine Vet J Suppl 1998;(26):1521.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Scheibe KM, Eichhorn K & Kalz B. Water consumption and watering behavior of Przewalski horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in a semireserve. Zoo Biol 1998; 17:181192

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Bauer IE, McMorrow J, Yalden DW. The historic ranges of three equid species in north-east Africa: a quantitative comparison of environmental tolerances. J Biogeogr 1994; 21:169182.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Stafford KJ, et al. Social and spatial structure and range use by Kaimanawa wild horses (Equus caballus: Equidae). N Z J Ecol 2000; 242:139152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Rogers GM. Kaimanawa feral horses and their environmental impacts. N Z J Ecol 1991; 15:4964.

  • 11.

    Australian Government. Bureau of Meteorology. Available at: www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/index.shtml. Accessed Jul 16, 2010.

  • 12.

    Hampson BA, de Laat M, Mills PC, et al. Distances travelled by feral horses in ‘outback’ Australia. Equine Vet J 2010;42(suppl 38): 582586.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Wagner IP, Hood DM. Effect of prolonged water immersion on equine hoof epidermis in vitro. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63:11401144.

  • 14.

    Kasapi MA, Goslin JM. Micromechanics of the equine hoof wall: optimizing crack control and material stiffness through modulation of the properties of keratin. J Exp Biol 1999; 202:377391.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement