Comparison of multi-detector row computed tomography with echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function in healthy dogs

Christiane R. Henjes Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Christiane R. Henjes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephan Hungerbühler Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Stephan Hungerbühler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Iwona B. Bojarski Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Iwona B. Bojarski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ingo Nolte Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Ingo Nolte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Patrick Wefstaedt Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.

Search for other papers by Patrick Wefstaedt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the use of retrospectively ECG-gated, contrast-enhanced, multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for assessment of left ventricular function in dogs and to compare the results with those obtained by use of 2-D and M-mode echocardiographc techniques.

Animals—10 healthy Beagles.

Procedures—Dogs underwent MDCT (performed by use of a 64-detector row CT system) and echocardiography under general anesthesia. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and ejection fraction (EF) were determined in MDCT-generated multiplanar reformatted images by use of Simpson and biplane area-length calculation methods. Results were compared with left ventricular ESV, EDV, and EF determined in echocardiographc images by use of Teichholz and bullet method calculations. Results were evaluated via Deming regression analysis and Pearson correlation tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess limits of agreement and systematic errors between the 2 methods.

Results—Mean values for EDV and ESV determined by use of MDCT were highly correlated with those determined by use of echocardiography, regardless of the calculation methods compared (r = 0.91 to 0.96); volumes determined by use of MDCT appeared to be higher than those determined by use of echocardiography, although most differences were nonsignificant. Mean EF determined by use of MDCT with the Simpson calculation method was highly correlated with that determined by use of echocardiography with bullet method calculations (r = 0.90).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that assessment of left ventricular volume and function in dogs is feasible with MDCT. To estimate left ventricular EF with MDCT. use of the Simpson calculation method is advised.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the use of retrospectively ECG-gated, contrast-enhanced, multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for assessment of left ventricular function in dogs and to compare the results with those obtained by use of 2-D and M-mode echocardiographc techniques.

Animals—10 healthy Beagles.

Procedures—Dogs underwent MDCT (performed by use of a 64-detector row CT system) and echocardiography under general anesthesia. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and ejection fraction (EF) were determined in MDCT-generated multiplanar reformatted images by use of Simpson and biplane area-length calculation methods. Results were compared with left ventricular ESV, EDV, and EF determined in echocardiographc images by use of Teichholz and bullet method calculations. Results were evaluated via Deming regression analysis and Pearson correlation tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess limits of agreement and systematic errors between the 2 methods.

Results—Mean values for EDV and ESV determined by use of MDCT were highly correlated with those determined by use of echocardiography, regardless of the calculation methods compared (r = 0.91 to 0.96); volumes determined by use of MDCT appeared to be higher than those determined by use of echocardiography, although most differences were nonsignificant. Mean EF determined by use of MDCT with the Simpson calculation method was highly correlated with that determined by use of echocardiography with bullet method calculations (r = 0.90).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that assessment of left ventricular volume and function in dogs is feasible with MDCT. To estimate left ventricular EF with MDCT. use of the Simpson calculation method is advised.

Contributor Notes

Presented in abstract form at the 17th Annual InnLab Meeting, Berlin, February 2009.

Address correspondence to Dr. Wefstaedt (Patrick.wefstaedt@tiho-hannover.de).
  • 1.

    Borgarelli M, Santilli RA, Chiavegato D, et al. Prognostic indicators for dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20:104110.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Kittleson MD, Eyster GE, Kowlen GG, et al. Myocardial function in small dogs with chronic mitral regurgitation and severe congestive heart failure. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984; 184:455459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Chapman CB, Baker O, Reynolds J, et al. Use of biplane cinefluorography for measurement of ventricular volume. Circulation 1958; 18:11051117.

  • 4.

    Gueret P, Meerbaum S, Zwehl W, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular stroke volume: experimental correlation with thermodilution and cineangiography in normal and ischemic states. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1981; 7:247258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    van den Brom WE, Stokhof AA. Radionuclide angiography in the normal dog: equilibrium studies. Res Vet Sci 1989; 47:333337.

  • 6.

    Sisson DD, Daniel GB, Twardock AR. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fractions determined in healthy anesthetized dogs by echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:18401847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hetyey C, Balogh L, Andócs G, et al. Comparison of echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in the measurements of left ventricular systolic function parameters in healthy dogs. Acta Vet Hung 2002; 50:2129.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Wyatt HL, Heng MK, Meerbaum S, et al. Cross-sectional echocardiography. II. Analysis of mathematic models for quantifying volume of the formalin-fixed left ventricle. Circulation 1980; 61:11191125.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Gueret P, Meerbaum S, Wyatt HL, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Importance of accounting for dyssynergy in short-axis reconstruction models. Circulation 1980; 62:13081318.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Hermann MV, et al. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence and absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 1976; 37:711.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Dell'Italia LJ, Blackwell GG, Pearce DJ, et al. Assessment of ventricular volumes using cine magnetic resonance in the intact dog. A comparison of measurement methods. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:162167.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:15451550.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Bansal D, Singh RM, Sakar M, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with two-dimension standard echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function. Int J Card Imaging 2008; 24:317325.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Hennemann MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2006; 13:480487.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 230:403410.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Juergens KU & Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:342357.

  • 17.

    Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S, et al. Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetectorrow computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:551559.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hosoi S, Mochizuki T, Miyagawa M, et al. Assessment of left ventricular volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT): phantom and human studies. Radiat Med 2003; 21:6267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103:25352538.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Schroeder S, Flohr T, Kopp AF, et al. Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by x-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 26:900906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-de-tector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:864871.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Willmann JK, Kobza R, Roos JE, et al. ECG-gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of mitral valve disease: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:26622669.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, et al. Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 2002; 225:120128.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Berninger WH, Redington RW, Doherty P, et al. Gated cardiac scanning: canine studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979; 3:155163.

  • 25.

    Ringertz HG, Skiöldebrand CG, Refsum H, et al. A comparison between the information in gated and nongated cardiac CT images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6:933938.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Mancini GBJ, Peck WW, Slutksy RA, et al. Use of computerized tomography to assess myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in dogs during acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:282289.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Wyatt HL, Haendchen RV, Meerbaum S, et al. Assessment of quantitative methods for two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52:396401.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus tracking technique. Radiology 2004; 233:817823.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. From the Committee on Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Technology, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology; and Board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council, Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation 1992; 86:338339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539542.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1987; 58:10721083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Kim TH, Hur J, Kim SJ, et al. Two-phase reconstruction for the assessment of left ventricular volume and function using retrospective ECG-gated MDCT: comparison with echocardiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185:319325.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Cui W, Kondo T, Anno H, et al. The accuracy and optimal slice thickness of multislice helical computed tomography for right and left ventricular volume measurement. Chin Med J (Engl) 2004; 117:12831287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Serres F, Chetboul V, Tissier R, et al. Comparison of 3 ultrasound methods for quantifying left ventricular systolic function: correlation with disease severity and prognostic value in dogs with mitral valve disease. J Vet Intern Med 2008; 22:566577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Heuschmid M, Küttner A, Schröder S, et al. Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography. Rofo 2003; 175:13491354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Flohr T, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, et al. New technical developments in multislice CT, part 2: sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning an increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Rofo 2002; 174:10221027.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Mahnken A, Hohl C, Suess C, et al. Influence of heart rate and temporal resolution on left-ventricular volumes in cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography. A phantom study. Invest Radiol 2006; 41:429435.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M, et al. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT. Rofo 2004; 176:529537.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement