Quantitative perfusion analysis of the pancreas and duodenum in healthy dogs by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Jennifer L. Johnson-Neitman Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Jennifer L. Johnson-Neitman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Robert T. O'Brien Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Robert T. O'Brien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Johna D. Wallace Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Johna D. Wallace in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

Objective—To investigate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as a minimally invasive method for the subjective and quantitative assessment of pancreatic and duodenal perfusion in healthy adult dogs, with reference to perfusion in adjacent liver tissue.

Animals—8 clinically normal adult dogs.

Procedures—Contrast-enhanced ultrasonograms of the right pancreatic limb, proximal portion of the descending duodenum, and adjacent liver were acquired after IV administration of a microbubble contrast medium. Following subjective evaluation, quantitative time-intensity curves were generated from regions of interest in the pancreas, duodenum, and liver. Five contrast medium characteristics representing perfusion parameters were determined for each organ and used for statistical analysis: interval to arrival, inflow rate, peak intensity (PI), time of peak intensity (TPI), and outflow rate.

Results—Significant associations between pancreatic and duodenal values were found for interval to contrast medium arrival, PI, TPI, and outflow rate. Pancreatic and duodenal inflow rates were not correlated. Inflow and outflow rates were significantly faster and TPI significantly shorter for the pancreas and duodenum, compared with values for the liver. There was no significant difference among all 3 organs for interval to arrival and PI of contrast medium. Subjective evaluation findings corresponded to quantitative analysis results.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that contrast-enhanced ultrasonography may be a useful, minimally invasive method for evaluating pancreatic and duodenal perfusion in dogs. The data from healthy dogs reported here could aid in the assessment of pancreatic and duodenal conditions and their response to medical treatment.

Abstract

Objective—To investigate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as a minimally invasive method for the subjective and quantitative assessment of pancreatic and duodenal perfusion in healthy adult dogs, with reference to perfusion in adjacent liver tissue.

Animals—8 clinically normal adult dogs.

Procedures—Contrast-enhanced ultrasonograms of the right pancreatic limb, proximal portion of the descending duodenum, and adjacent liver were acquired after IV administration of a microbubble contrast medium. Following subjective evaluation, quantitative time-intensity curves were generated from regions of interest in the pancreas, duodenum, and liver. Five contrast medium characteristics representing perfusion parameters were determined for each organ and used for statistical analysis: interval to arrival, inflow rate, peak intensity (PI), time of peak intensity (TPI), and outflow rate.

Results—Significant associations between pancreatic and duodenal values were found for interval to contrast medium arrival, PI, TPI, and outflow rate. Pancreatic and duodenal inflow rates were not correlated. Inflow and outflow rates were significantly faster and TPI significantly shorter for the pancreas and duodenum, compared with values for the liver. There was no significant difference among all 3 organs for interval to arrival and PI of contrast medium. Subjective evaluation findings corresponded to quantitative analysis results.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that contrast-enhanced ultrasonography may be a useful, minimally invasive method for evaluating pancreatic and duodenal perfusion in dogs. The data from healthy dogs reported here could aid in the assessment of pancreatic and duodenal conditions and their response to medical treatment.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Johnson-Neitman's present address is VCA Alameda East Veterinary Hospital, 9770 E Alameda Ave, Denver, CO 80247.

Dr. O'Brien's present address is Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Supported by a grant from the Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University.

Presented at the American College of Veterinary Radiology Annual Scientific Meeting, Chicago, November 2007.

Address correspondence to Dr. Johnson-Neitman (jneitman@sbcglobal.net).
  • 1.

    Paul D, Phillips PJ. Cadence contrast agent imaging technology on the ACUSON Sequoia Ultrasound Platform. Mountain View, Calif: Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Cullen JM, MacLachlan NJ. Liver, biliary system, and exocrine pancreas. In: McGavin MD, Carlton WW, Zachary JF, eds. Thomson's special veterinary pathology. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 2001;120121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, Herrgesell EJ, et al. Pancreas. In: Nyland TG, Mattoon JS, eds. Small animal diagnostic ultrasound. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2002;144157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Williams DA, Steiner JM. Canine exocrine pancreatic disease. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, eds. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine: diseases of the dog and cat. 6th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2005;1487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Pennick D. Gastrointestinal tract. In: Nyland T, Mattoon J, eds. Small animal diagnostic ultrasound. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2002;207230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Brocchi E, Piscaglia F, Bonora M, et al. Echo-enhanced ultrasonography: is it the future gold standard of imaging in acute pancreatitis? JOP 2005; 6:464466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    D'Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Falconi M, et al. Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor: value of contrast enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29:246258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    D'Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Vasori S, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic detection of small pancreatic insulinoma. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:413417.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Rickes S, Mönkemüller K & Malfertheiner P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. JOP 2006; 7:584592.

  • 10.

    Kitano M, Kudo M, Maekawa K, et al. Dynamic imaging of pancreatic diseases by contrast enhanced coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonography. Gut 2004; 53:854859.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Nagase M, Furuse J, Ishii H, et al. Evaluation of contrast enhancement patterns in pancreatic tumors by coded harmonic sonographic imaging with a microbubble contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:789795.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    D'Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Tognolini A, et al. Mass-forming pancreatitis: value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:41814184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of autoimmune pancreatitis: comparison with pathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:199206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ozawa Y, Numata K, Tanaka K, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of small pancreatic mass lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21:983991.

  • 15.

    Kersting S, Konopke R, Kersting F, et al. Quantitative perfusion analysis of transabdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of pancreatic masses and carcinomas. Gastroenterology 2009; 137:19031911.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Rickes S, Uhle C, Kahl S, et al. Echo enhanced ultrasound: a new valid initial imaging approach for severe acute pancreatitis. Gut 2006; 55:7478.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Ueno N, Kawamura H, Hoshino T, et al. Detection of alimentary tract hemorrhage on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25:683686.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hata J, Kamada T, Haruma K, et al. Evaluation of bowel ischemia with contrast-enhanced US: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 236:712715.

  • 19.

    Hamada T, Yamauchi M, Tanaka M, et al. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with advanced dynamic flow for the diagnosis of intestinal ischaemia. Br J Radiol 2007; 80:603608.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Goldberg BB, Merton DA, Liu JB, et al. Evaluation of bleeding sites with a tissue-specific sonographic contrast agent: preliminary experiences in an animal model. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17:609616.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Yoshida S, Hata J, Haruma K, et al. Evaluation of flash echo imaging of the canine gastrointestinal tract. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:751755.

  • 22.

    Ziegler LE, O'Brien RT, Waller KR, et al. Quantitative contrast harmonic ultrasound imaging of normal canine liver. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44:451454.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Waller KR, O'Brien RT, Zagzebski JA. Quantitative contrast ultrasound analysis of renal perfusion in normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48:373377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Nakamura K, Sasaki N, Yoshikawa M, et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of canine spleen. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50:104108.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Vignoli M, Russo M, Catone G, et al. Assessment of vascular perfusion kinetics using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of prostatic disease in dogs. Reprod Domest Anim 2011; 46:209213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Russo M, Vignoli M, Catone G, et al. Prostatic perfusion in the dog using contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound. Reprod Domest Anim 2009;44(suppl 2): 334335.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    O'Brien RT, Iani M, Matheson J, et al. Contrast harmonic ultrasound of spontaneous liver nodules in 32 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004; 45:547553.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Ivancic M, Long F, Seiler GS. Contrast harmonic ultrasonography of splenic masses and associated liver nodules in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 234:8894.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Ohlerth S, Dennler M, Rüefli E, et al. Contrast harmonic imaging characterization of canine splenic lesions. J Vet Intern Med 2008; 22:10951102.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Haers H, Vignoli M, Paes G, et al. Contrast harmonic ultrasonographic appearance of focal space-occupying renal lesions. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51:516522.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Salwei RM, O'Brien RT, Matheson JS. Use of contrast harmonic ultrasound for the diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunts in three dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44:301305.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Salwei RM, O'Brien RT, Matheson JS. Characterization of lymphomatous lymph nodes in dogs using contrast harmonic and power Doppler ultrasound. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46:411416.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Young B, Heath JW. Liver and pancreas In: Young B, Heath JW, eds. Wheater's functional histology: a text and colour atlas. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000;283284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Young B, Heath JW. The endocrine glands. In: Young B, Heath JW, eds. Wheater's functional histology: a text and colour atlas. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000;310327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Bonner-Weir S. The microvasculature of the pancreas, with emphasis on that of the islets of Langerhans. Anatomy and functional implications. In: Go VLW, Dimagno EP, Gardner JD, et al, eds. The pancreas: pathobiology and disease. New York: Raven, 1993;759768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Davis DJ, MacAulay MA, MacDonald AS, et al. Islets of Langerhans in dog pancreas. Volume fraction and relative distribution of diameters. Transplantation 1988; 45:10991103.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Evans HE. The digestive apparatus and abdomen. In: Evans HE, ed. Miller's anatomy of the dog. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1993;460.

  • 38.

    Ohtani O, Wang QX. Comparative analysis of insulo-acinar portal system in rats, guinea pigs, and dogs. Microsc Res Tech 1997; 37:489496.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Wayland H. Microcirculation in pancreatic function. Microsc Res Tech 1997; 37:418433.

  • 40.

    Guyton A & Hall J. General principles of gastrointestinal function-motility, nervous control, and blood circulation. In: Guyton A, Hall J, eds. Textbook of medical physiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2000;718726.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Krause WJ. Digestive system. In: Krause WJ, ed. The art of examining and interpreting histologic preparations: a student handbook. Pearl River, NY: The Parthenon Publishing Group Inc, 2001;99110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Strombeck DR. Integration of gastrointestinal functions. In: Strombeck DR, ed. Strombeck's small animal gastroenterology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1996;113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Martinez M & Modric S. Patient variation in veterinary medicine: part I. Influence of altered physiological states. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2010; 33:213226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Modric S & Martinez M. Patient variation in veterinary medicine-part II-influence of physiological variables. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34:209223.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Gaschen L & Kircher P. Two-dimensional grayscale ultrasound and spectral Doppler waveform evaluation of dogs with chronic enteropathies. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22:122127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Riesen S, Schmid V, Gaschen L, et al. Doppler measurement of splanchnic blood flow during digestion in unsedated normal dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002; 43:554560.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Hess RS. Insulin-secreting islet cell neoplasia. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, eds. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine: diseases of the dog and cat. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2000;15601563.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    American Cancer Society. Pancreatic Cancer. Available at www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003131-pdf.pdf. Accessed Nov 14, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Gaschen L, Kircher P, Lang J, et al. Pattern recognition and feature extraction of canine celiac and cranial mesenteric arterial waveforms: normal versus chronic enteropathy—a pilot study. Vet J 2005; 169:242250.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement