Accuracy and precision of computer-assisted analysis of bone density via conventional and digital radiography in relation to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

Calogero Vaccaro Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Radiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro. (PD), Italy.

Search for other papers by Calogero Vaccaro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BSc
,
Roberto Busetto Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Radiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro. (PD), Italy.

Search for other papers by Roberto Busetto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Daniele Bernardini Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Radiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro. (PD), Italy.

Search for other papers by Daniele Bernardini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Carlo Anselmi Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Radiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro. (PD), Italy.

Search for other papers by Carlo Anselmi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Alessandro Zotti Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Radiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro. (PD), Italy.

Search for other papers by Alessandro Zotti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the precision and accuracy of assessing bone mineral density (BMD) by use of mean gray value (MGV) on digitalized and digital images of conventional and digital radiographs, respectively, of ex vivo bovine and equine bone specimens in relation to the gold-standard technique of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Sample—Left and right metatarsal bones from 11 beef cattle and right femurs from 2 horses.

Procedures—Bovine specimens were imaged by use of conventional radiography, whereas equine specimens were imaged by use of computed radiography (digital radiography). Each specimen was subsequently scanned by use of the same DEXA equipment. The BMD values resulting from each DEXA scan were paired with the MGVs obtained by use of software on the corresponding digitalized or digital radiographic image.

Results—The MGV analysis of digitalized and digital x-ray images was a precise (coefficient of variation, 0.1 and 0.09, respectively) and highly accurate method for assessing BMD, compared with DEXA (correlation coefficient, 0.910 and 0.937 for conventional and digital radiography, respectively).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The high correlation between MGV and BMD indicated that MGV analysis may be a reliable alternative to DEXA in assessing radiographic bone density. This may provide a new, inexpensive, and readily available estimate of BMD.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the precision and accuracy of assessing bone mineral density (BMD) by use of mean gray value (MGV) on digitalized and digital images of conventional and digital radiographs, respectively, of ex vivo bovine and equine bone specimens in relation to the gold-standard technique of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Sample—Left and right metatarsal bones from 11 beef cattle and right femurs from 2 horses.

Procedures—Bovine specimens were imaged by use of conventional radiography, whereas equine specimens were imaged by use of computed radiography (digital radiography). Each specimen was subsequently scanned by use of the same DEXA equipment. The BMD values resulting from each DEXA scan were paired with the MGVs obtained by use of software on the corresponding digitalized or digital radiographic image.

Results—The MGV analysis of digitalized and digital x-ray images was a precise (coefficient of variation, 0.1 and 0.09, respectively) and highly accurate method for assessing BMD, compared with DEXA (correlation coefficient, 0.910 and 0.937 for conventional and digital radiography, respectively).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The high correlation between MGV and BMD indicated that MGV analysis may be a reliable alternative to DEXA in assessing radiographic bone density. This may provide a new, inexpensive, and readily available estimate of BMD.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Zotti's present address is Clinical Section, Radiology Unit, Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.

Address correspondence to Dr. Zotti (alessandro.zotti@unipd.it).
  • 1.

    Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR, et al. Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89:36513655.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Grier SJ, Turner AS, Alvis MR. The use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in animals. Invest Radiol 1996; 31:5062.

  • 3.

    Zotti A, Isola M, Sturaro E, et al. Vertebral mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a group of healthy Italian Boxer dogs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2004; 51:254258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Zotti A, Caldin M, Vettorato E, et al. Bone mineral density in two Boxer dogs affected by moderate to end-stage chronic renal failure. Vet Res Commun 2006;30(suppl 1): 337339.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Zotti A, Gianesella M, Gasparinetti N, et al. A preliminary investigation of the relationship between the “moment of resistance” of the canine spine, and the frequency of traumatic vertebral lesions at different spinal levels. Res Vet Sci 2011; 90:179184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    McClure SR, Glickman LT, Glickman NW, et al. Evaluation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for in situ measurement of bone mineral density of equine metacarpi. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:752756.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Carstanjen B, Duboeuf F, Detilleux J, et al. Equine third meta-carpal bone assessment by quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: an ex vivo study. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2003; 50:4247.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Zotti A, Rizzi C, Chiericato G, et al. Accuracy and precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for ex vivo determination of mineral content in turkey poult bones. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44:4952.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Keene BE, Knowlton KF, McGilliard ML, et al. Measures of bone mineral content in mature dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:38163825.

  • 10.

    Zotti A, Gianesella M, Ceccato C, et al. Physiological values and factors affecting the metacarpal bone density of healthy feedlot beef cattle as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2010; 94:615622.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Specht EE. Evaluation of a computerised image analyser for studying alterations in radiographic bone density in the rat. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1977; 59:349351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Anbinder AL, de Almeida Prado F, de Almeida Prado M, et al. The influence of ovariectomy, simvastatin and sodium alendronate on alveolar bone in rats. Braz Oral Res 2007; 21:247252.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Sakakura CE, Giro G, Concalves D, et al. Radiographic assessment of bone density around integrated titanium implants after ovariectomy in rats. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17:134138.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    de Morais JA, Trindade-Suedam IK, Pepato MT, et al. Effects of diabetes mellitus and insulin therapy on bone density around osseointegrated dental implants: a digital subtraction radiography study in rats. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009; 20:796801.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Haristoy RA, Valiyaparambil JV, Mallya SM. Correlation of CBCT gray scale values with bone densities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:e28.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Mah P, McDavid WD. Conversion of CBCT gray levels to Hounsfield units. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105:e56.

  • 17.

    Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K, et al. Bone density measurements in intra-oral radiographs. Clin Oral Invest 2007; 11:225229.

  • 18.

    Bréban S, Padilla F, Fujisawa Y, et al. Trabecular and cortical bone separately assessed at radius with a new ultrasound device, in a young adult population with various physical activities. Bone 2010; 46:16201625.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Gorman SC, Kraus KH, Keating JH, et al. In vivo axial dynamization of canine tibial fractures using the Securos external skeletal fixation system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18:199207.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Strandberg S, Wretling ML, Wredmark W, et al. Reliability of computed tomography measurements in assessment of thigh muscle cross sectional area and attenuation. BMC Med Imaging [serial online] 2010; 10:18. available at: www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/10/18. Accessed October 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Chou S, Chen C, Chow P, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of endometrial changes using computer assisted image analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36:634638.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Schwarz T, Störk CK, Mellor D, et al. Osteopenia and other radiographic signs in canine hyperadrenocorticism. J Small Anim Pract 2000; 41:491495.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement