Analgesic effects of meloxicam administration on postoperative orthopedic pain in domestic pigeons (Columba livia)

Marion Desmarchelier Département de Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.

Search for other papers by Marion Desmarchelier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DV, MSc
,
Eric Troncy Groupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec, Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.

Search for other papers by Eric Troncy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DV, PhD
,
Guy Fitzgerald Département de Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.

Search for other papers by Guy Fitzgerald in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DMV, MSc
, and
Stéphane Lair Département de Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.

Search for other papers by Stéphane Lair in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DMV, DVSc

Abstract

Objective—To assess the analgesic effects of 2 doses of meloxicam on the degree of postoperative orthopedic pain in pigeons.

Animals—21 domestic pigeons (Columba livia).

Procedures—In each bird, a standardized osteotomy of 1 femur was performed and the fracture was immobilized with an intramedullary pin. Birds were randomly allocated to receive saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (control) or meloxicam (0.5 mg/kg [low dose] or 2.0 mg/kg [high dose]). The first treatment was administered IM after surgery was completed. Subsequent treatments were administered PO every 12 hours for 9 days. Degree of postoperative pain was assessed for the first 4 days after surgery by use of 3 methods: an electronic perch for assessment of weight-bearing load differential of the pelvic limbs, 4 pain scales, and analysis of video-recorded partial ethograms for bird activity and posture.

Results—No significant differences were observed between the control group and the low-dose meloxicam group in any tested variable. The high-dose meloxicam group had a greater degree of weight bearing on the affected limb from the second to the fourth postoperative day as well as lower pain scores for at least the first 2 postoperative days, compared with the other groups. Return to presurgical behavior was achieved faster in pigeons that received high-dose meloxicam than in the other groups. No adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of meloxicam at 0.5 mg/kg appeared ineffective in minimizing postoperative orthopedic pain in pigeons, but the 2.0 mg/kg dose provided quantifiable analgesia that appeared safe in this species in experimental conditions.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the analgesic effects of 2 doses of meloxicam on the degree of postoperative orthopedic pain in pigeons.

Animals—21 domestic pigeons (Columba livia).

Procedures—In each bird, a standardized osteotomy of 1 femur was performed and the fracture was immobilized with an intramedullary pin. Birds were randomly allocated to receive saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (control) or meloxicam (0.5 mg/kg [low dose] or 2.0 mg/kg [high dose]). The first treatment was administered IM after surgery was completed. Subsequent treatments were administered PO every 12 hours for 9 days. Degree of postoperative pain was assessed for the first 4 days after surgery by use of 3 methods: an electronic perch for assessment of weight-bearing load differential of the pelvic limbs, 4 pain scales, and analysis of video-recorded partial ethograms for bird activity and posture.

Results—No significant differences were observed between the control group and the low-dose meloxicam group in any tested variable. The high-dose meloxicam group had a greater degree of weight bearing on the affected limb from the second to the fourth postoperative day as well as lower pain scores for at least the first 2 postoperative days, compared with the other groups. Return to presurgical behavior was achieved faster in pigeons that received high-dose meloxicam than in the other groups. No adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of meloxicam at 0.5 mg/kg appeared ineffective in minimizing postoperative orthopedic pain in pigeons, but the 2.0 mg/kg dose provided quantifiable analgesia that appeared safe in this species in experimental conditions.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Desmarchelier's present address is Department of Companion Animals, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.

Supported by Boehringer-Ingelheim and the Fonds en Santé des Ani-maux de Compagnie de la Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal.

The authors thank Guy Beauchamp for statistical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lair (stephane.lair@umontreal.ca).
  • 1.

    Paul-Murphy J, Ludders JW. Avian analgesia. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2001; 4:3545.

  • 2.

    Gentle MJ. Pain in birds. Anim Welf 1992; 1:235247.

  • 3.

    Gentle MJ, Hunter LN. Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var domesticus. Res Vet Sci 1990; 50:95101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Machin KL. Controlling avian pain. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2005;299309.

  • 5.

    Paul-Murphy JR, Brunson DB & Miletic V. Analgesic effects of butorphanol and buprenorphine in conscious African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus and Psittacus erithacus timneh). Am J Vet Res 1999; 60:12181221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Sladky KK, Krugner-Higby L, Meek-Walker E, et al. Serum concentrations and analgesic effects of liposome-encapsulated and standard butorphanol tartrate in parrots. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67:775781.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hocking PM, Robertson GW, Gentle MJ. Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on pain-related behaviour in a model of articular pain in the domestic fowl. Res Vet Sci 2005; 78:6975.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Clyde VL & Paul-Murphy J. Avian analgesia. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, eds. Zoo and wild animal medicine: current therapy 4. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1999;309314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Pereira ME & Werther K. Evaluation of the renal effects of flunixin meglumine, ketoprofen and meloxicam in budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). Vet Rec 2007; 160:844846.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Mulcahy DM, Tuomi P, Larsen RS. Differential mortality of male Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) and King eiders (Somateria spectabilis) subsequent to anesthesia with propofol, bupivacaïne, and ketoprofen. J Avian Med Surg 2003; 17:117123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    McGeown D, Danbury TC, Waterman-Pearson AE, et al. Effect of carprofen on lameness in broiler chickens. Vet Rec 1999; 144:668671.

  • 12.

    Paul-Murphy JR, Sladky KK, Krugner-Higby LA, et al. Analgesic effects of carprofen and liposome-encapsulated butorphanol tartrate in Hispaniolan parrots (Amazona ventralis) with experimentally induced arthritis. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70:12011210.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Paul-Murphy J. Pain management. In: Harrison GJ, Lightfoot TL, eds. Clinical avian medicine. Vol 1. Palm Beach, Fla: Spix Publishing, 2006;233239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Baert K & De Backer P. Comparative pharmacokinetics of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in five birds species. Comp Biochem Physiol C 2003; 134:2533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Naidoo V, Wolter K, Cromarty AD, et al. The pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in vultures. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008; 31:128134.

  • 16.

    Cuthbert R, Parry-Jones J, Green RE, et al. NSAIDs and scavenging birds: potential impacts beyond Asia's critically endangered vultures. Biol Lett 2007; 3:9093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Swarup D, Patra RC, Prakash V, et al. Safety of meloxicam to critically endangered Gyps vultures and other scavenging birds in India. Anim Conserv 2007; 10:192198.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Hawkins MG, Karriker MJ, Wiebe V, et al. Drug distribution and stability in extemporaneous preparations of meloxicam and carprofen after dilution and suspension at two storage temperatures. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229:968974.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Cole G, Paul-Murphy J, Krugner-Higby L, et al. Analgesic effects of intramuscular administration of meloxicam in Hispaniolan parrots (Amazona ventralis) with experimentally induced arthritis. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70:14711476.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Desmarchelier M, Troncy E, Fitzgerald G, et al. Evaluation of a fracture pain model in domestic pigeons (Columba livia). Am J Vet Res 2012; 73:353360.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    International Species Inventory System. Physiological data reference values [CD-ROM]. Eagan, Minn: International Species Inventory System, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Marx KL. Therapeutic agents. In: Harrison GJ, Lightfoot TL, eds. Clinical avian medicine. Vol I. Palm Beach, Fla: Spix Publishing, 2006;241342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    AVMA policy. Use of placebo controls in assessment of new therapies for alleviation of acute pain in client-owned animals. Available at: www.avma.org/issues/policy/placebo_controls.asp. Accessed Aug 12, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Minville V, Laffosse JM, Fourcade O, et al. Mouse model of pain fracture. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:467472.

  • 25.

    Freeman KT, Koewler NJ, Jimenez-Andrade JM, et al. A fracture pain model in the rat. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:473483.

  • 26.

    Ekman EF, Koman LA. Acute pain following musculoskeletal injuries and orthopaedic surgery: mechanisms and management. Instr Course Lect 2005; 54:2133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Gentle MJ, Corr SA. Endogenous analgesia in the chicken. Neurosci Lett 1995; 201:211214.

  • 28.

    Lafuente MP, Franch J, Durall I, et al. Comparison between meloxicam and transdermally administered fentanyl for treatment of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing osteotomy of the tibia and fibula and placement of a uniplanar external distraction device. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227:17681774.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Busch U, Schmid J, Heinzel G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in animals and the relevance to humans. Drug Metab Dispos 1998; 26:576584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Lees P, Sedwick AD, Higgins AJ, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in the horse. Br Vet J 1991; 147:97108.

  • 31.

    Redig P. Falconiformes. In: Fowler ME, Miller RE, eds. Zoo and wild animal medicine. St Louis: WB Saunders Co, 2003;150161.

  • 32.

    Stanford M. Cage and aviary birds. In: Meredith A, Redrobe S, eds. BSAVA manual of exotic pets. Quedgeley, Gloucester, England: British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2002;157167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Cooper JE. Medicine and other agents used in treatment, including emergency anaesthesia kit. In: Cooper JE, ed. Birds of prey: health and disease. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science, 2002;271277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Saimour J. Avian medicine. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Mosby Elsevier, 2008;525.

  • 35.

    Uphoff Meteyer C, Rideout BA, Gilbert M, et al. Pathology and proposed pathophysiology of diclofenac poisoning in free-living and experimentally exposed Oriental white-backed vultures (Gyps bengalensis). J Wildl Dis 2005; 41:707716.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement