Use of contrast echocardiography for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion and pulmonary transit time in healthy dogs

Serena Crosara Department of Animal Pathology, University of Torino, Grugliasco 10095, Italy.

Search for other papers by Serena Crosara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Ingrid Ljungvall Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Clinical Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Search for other papers by Ingrid Ljungvall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Marco L. Margiocco Department of Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Marco L. Margiocco in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jens Häggström Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Clinical Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Search for other papers by Jens Häggström in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Alberto Tarducci Department of Animal Pathology, University of Torino, Grugliasco 10095, Italy.

Search for other papers by Alberto Tarducci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Michele Borgarelli Department of Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Michele Borgarelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
Restricted access
Purchase Article

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate reproducibility of ejection fraction (EF), myocardial perfusion (MP), and pulmonary transit time (PTT) measured in a group of dogs by use of contrast echocardiography and to examine safety of this method by evaluating cardiac troponin I concentrations.

Animals—6 healthy dogs.

Procedures—2 bolus injections and a constant rate infusion of contrast agent were administered IV. Echocardiographic EF was determined by use of the area-length method and was calculated without and with contrast agent. The PTT and normalized PTT (PTT/mean R-R interval) were measured for each bolus. Constant rate infusion was used for global MP evaluation, and regional MP was calculated by use of a real-time method in 4 regions of interest of the left ventricle. Cardiac troponin I concentration was analyzed before and after contrast agent administration. Intraoberserver and interobserver variability was calculated.

Results—EF was easier to determine with the ultrasonographic contrast agent. For the first and second bolus, mean ± SD PTT was 1.8 ± 0.2 seconds and 2.1 ± 0.3 seconds and normalized PTT was 3.4 ± 0.3 seconds and 3.5 ± 0.3 seconds, respectively. A coefficient of variation < 15% was obtained for global MP but not for the regional MPs. No differences were detected between precontrast and postcontrast cardiac troponin I concentrations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Contrast echocardiography appeared to be a repeat-able and safe technique for use in the evaluation of global MP and PTT in healthy dogs, and it improved delineation of the endocardial border in dogs.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 54 0 0
Full Text Views 1066 612 87
PDF Downloads 340 128 15
Advertisement