Analysis of the transport of and cytotoxic effects for nalbuphine solution in corneal cells

Ronald A. Spatola Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Ronald A. Spatola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Mirunalni Thangavelu College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Mirunalni Thangavelu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Vijayasaradhi Upadhyayula College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Vijayasaradhi Upadhyayula in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Seungsoo Lee College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Seungsoo Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Mitch A. Phelps College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Mitch A. Phelps in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Heather L. Chandler Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Heather L. Chandler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To assess the in vitro effects of various nalbuphine concentrations on viability and wound healing ability of corneal cells and potential drug transport through the corneal epithelium.

Sample—Cultured canine and human corneal epithelial cells (CECs) and cultured canine corneal stromal fibroblasts.

Procedures—CECs and stromal fibroblasts were exposed to nalbuphine (concentration of solutions ranged from 0% to 1.2%) for up to 30 minutes, and viability was assessed with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. A standard scratch test technique was used. Wound healing of CECs and stromal fibroblasts was evaluated following treatment with nalbuphine solutions < 0.1%. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry analysis was used to evaluate drug transport across a monolayer and a multilayer of human CECs.

Results—A progressive decrease in viability was detected in canine CECs for all nalbuphine treatment groups, whereas treatment with only 0.5% or 1.2% nalbuphine significantly reduced corneal stromal fibroblast viability, compared with results for control cells. Within 24 hours, treatment with 0.1% nalbuphine solution significantly altered the healing rate of both canine CECs and stromal fibroblasts. Continuous increases in transport rates of nalbuphine were detected with time for both the monolayer and multilayer of human CECs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In vitro, nalbuphine potentially could penetrate through corneal tissue, but it may cause damage to the corneal epithelium and stromal fibroblasts. Therefore, nalbuphine potentially may impair corneal wound healing.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the in vitro effects of various nalbuphine concentrations on viability and wound healing ability of corneal cells and potential drug transport through the corneal epithelium.

Sample—Cultured canine and human corneal epithelial cells (CECs) and cultured canine corneal stromal fibroblasts.

Procedures—CECs and stromal fibroblasts were exposed to nalbuphine (concentration of solutions ranged from 0% to 1.2%) for up to 30 minutes, and viability was assessed with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. A standard scratch test technique was used. Wound healing of CECs and stromal fibroblasts was evaluated following treatment with nalbuphine solutions < 0.1%. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry analysis was used to evaluate drug transport across a monolayer and a multilayer of human CECs.

Results—A progressive decrease in viability was detected in canine CECs for all nalbuphine treatment groups, whereas treatment with only 0.5% or 1.2% nalbuphine significantly reduced corneal stromal fibroblast viability, compared with results for control cells. Within 24 hours, treatment with 0.1% nalbuphine solution significantly altered the healing rate of both canine CECs and stromal fibroblasts. Continuous increases in transport rates of nalbuphine were detected with time for both the monolayer and multilayer of human CECs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In vitro, nalbuphine potentially could penetrate through corneal tissue, but it may cause damage to the corneal epithelium and stromal fibroblasts. Therefore, nalbuphine potentially may impair corneal wound healing.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 0 0
Full Text Views 1082 879 278
PDF Downloads 109 75 2
Advertisement