Analysis of the transport of and cytotoxic effects for nalbuphine solution in corneal cells

Ronald A. Spatola Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Ronald A. Spatola in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Mirunalni Thangavelu College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Mirunalni Thangavelu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Vijayasaradhi Upadhyayula College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Vijayasaradhi Upadhyayula in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Seungsoo Lee College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Seungsoo Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Mitch A. Phelps College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Mitch A. Phelps in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Heather L. Chandler Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Heather L. Chandler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To assess the in vitro effects of various nalbuphine concentrations on viability and wound healing ability of corneal cells and potential drug transport through the corneal epithelium.

Sample—Cultured canine and human corneal epithelial cells (CECs) and cultured canine corneal stromal fibroblasts.

Procedures—CECs and stromal fibroblasts were exposed to nalbuphine (concentration of solutions ranged from 0% to 1.2%) for up to 30 minutes, and viability was assessed with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. A standard scratch test technique was used. Wound healing of CECs and stromal fibroblasts was evaluated following treatment with nalbuphine solutions < 0.1%. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry analysis was used to evaluate drug transport across a monolayer and a multilayer of human CECs.

Results—A progressive decrease in viability was detected in canine CECs for all nalbuphine treatment groups, whereas treatment with only 0.5% or 1.2% nalbuphine significantly reduced corneal stromal fibroblast viability, compared with results for control cells. Within 24 hours, treatment with 0.1% nalbuphine solution significantly altered the healing rate of both canine CECs and stromal fibroblasts. Continuous increases in transport rates of nalbuphine were detected with time for both the monolayer and multilayer of human CECs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In vitro, nalbuphine potentially could penetrate through corneal tissue, but it may cause damage to the corneal epithelium and stromal fibroblasts. Therefore, nalbuphine potentially may impair corneal wound healing.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the in vitro effects of various nalbuphine concentrations on viability and wound healing ability of corneal cells and potential drug transport through the corneal epithelium.

Sample—Cultured canine and human corneal epithelial cells (CECs) and cultured canine corneal stromal fibroblasts.

Procedures—CECs and stromal fibroblasts were exposed to nalbuphine (concentration of solutions ranged from 0% to 1.2%) for up to 30 minutes, and viability was assessed with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. A standard scratch test technique was used. Wound healing of CECs and stromal fibroblasts was evaluated following treatment with nalbuphine solutions < 0.1%. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry analysis was used to evaluate drug transport across a monolayer and a multilayer of human CECs.

Results—A progressive decrease in viability was detected in canine CECs for all nalbuphine treatment groups, whereas treatment with only 0.5% or 1.2% nalbuphine significantly reduced corneal stromal fibroblast viability, compared with results for control cells. Within 24 hours, treatment with 0.1% nalbuphine solution significantly altered the healing rate of both canine CECs and stromal fibroblasts. Continuous increases in transport rates of nalbuphine were detected with time for both the monolayer and multilayer of human CECs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In vitro, nalbuphine potentially could penetrate through corneal tissue, but it may cause damage to the corneal epithelium and stromal fibroblasts. Therefore, nalbuphine potentially may impair corneal wound healing.

Contributor Notes

This manuscript represents a portion of a thesis submitted by Dr. Spatola to The Ohio State University Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Science degree.

Supported in part by Prescription Center.

Presented in abstract form at the 40th Annual Congress of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists, Chicago, November 2009.

The authors thank Dr. Susette Aquino for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Chandler (chandler.111@osu.edu).
  • 1. Nishida T. Cornea. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2005;326.

  • 2. Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et alNormal human keratocyte density and corneal thickness measurement by using confocal microscopy in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:333339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Cameron JD. Corneal reaction to injury. In:Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea. Vol 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2005;115128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Rozsa A, Beuerman R. Density and organization of free nerve endings in the corneal epithelium of the rabbit. Pain 1982;14:105120.

  • 5. Gilger BC, Bentley E, Ollivier FJ. Diseases and surgery of the canine cornea and sclera. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Vol 2. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2007;690752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Urtti A. Challenges and obstacles of ocular pharmacokinetics and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006;58:11311135.

  • 7. DeSantis LM, Patil PN. Pharmacokinetics. In: Mauger TF, Craig EL, eds. Havener's ocular pharmacology. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994;2252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Masferrer J, Kulkarni P. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a new approach to the therapy of ocular inflammation. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:S35S40.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Rosenwasser GO, Holland S, Plugfelder SC, et alTopical anesthetic abuse. Ophthalmology 1990;97:967972.

  • 10. Herring IP. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Part 3: mydriatics/cycloplegics, anesthetics, ophthalmic dyes, tear substitutes and stimulators, intraocular irrigating fluids, topical disinfectants, viscoelastics, fibrinolytics and antifibrinolytics, antifibrotic agents, tissue adhesives, and anticollagenase agents. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Vol 2. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2007;332354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Regnier A. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Part 2: antimicrobials, antiinflammatory agents, and antiglaucoma drugs. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Vol 2. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2007;288331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Becker B. The side effects of corticosteroids. Invest Ophthalmol 1964;3:492497.

  • 13. Petroutsos G, Guimaraes R, Giraud JP, et alCorticosteroids and corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:705708.

  • 14. Wilkie DA, Colitz CMH. Surgery of the canine lens. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Vol 2. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2007;888931.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Arey ML, Sullivan BR, Reinert CG, et alImpaired corneal wound healing associated with ketorolac 0.5% after uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction. Cornea 2007;26:11591164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. McCarey BE, Napalkov JA, Pippen PA, et alCorneal wound healing strength with topical antiinflammatory drugs. Cornea 1995;14:290294.

  • 17. Hendrix DVH, Ward DA, Barnhill MA. Effects of anti-inflammatory drugs and preservatives on morphologic characteristics and migration of canine corneal epithelial cells in tissue culture. Vet Ophthalmol 2002;5:127135.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Pharmakakis NM, Katsimpris JM, Melachrinou MP, et alCorneal complications following abuse of topical anesthetics. Eur J Ophthalmol 2002;12:373378.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Peyman GA, Rahimy MH, Fernandes ML. Effects of morphine on corneal sensitivity and epithelial wound healing: implications for topical ophthalmic analgesia. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;78:138141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Wenk HN, Nannenga MN, Honda CN. Effect of morphine sulphate eye drops on hyperalgesia in the rat cornea. Pain 2003;105:455465.

  • 21. Stiles J, Honda CN, Krohne SG, et alEffect of topical administration of 1% morphine sulfate solution on signs of pain and corneal wound healing in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:813818.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Romagnoli A, Keats AS. Comparative hemodynamic effects of nalbuphine and morphine in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Dis 1978;5:1924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Aitkenhead AR, Lin ES, Achola KJ. The pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous nalbuphine in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988;25:264268.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Podlas J, Breland B. Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:202204.

  • 25. Beaver WT, Feise GA. A comparison of the analgesic effect of intramuscular nalbuphine and morphine in patients with postoperative pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978;204:487496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Gunion MW, Marchionne AM, Anderson CTM. Use of the mixed agonist–antagonist nalbuphine in opioid based analgesia. Acute Pain 2004;6:2939.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Gal TJ, DiFazio CA, Moscicki J. Analgesic and respiratory depressant activity of nalbuphine: a comparison with morphine. Anesthesiology 1982;57:367374.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Gear RW, Miaskowski C, Gordon NC, et alThe kappa opioid nalbuphine produces gender- and dose-dependent analgesia and antianalgesia in patients with postoperative pain. Pain 1999;83:339345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Yeh YC, Lin TF, Lin FS, et alCombination of opioid agonist and agonist-antagonist: patient-controlled analgesia requirement and adverse events among different-ratio morphine and nalbuphine admixtures for postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:542548.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Mills CA, Flacke JW, Flacke WE, et alNarcotic reversal in hypercapnic dogs: comparison of naloxone and nalbuphine. Can J Anesth 1990;37:238244.

  • 31. Wagner AE, Worland GA, Glawe JC, et alMulticenter, randomized controlled trial of pain-related behaviors following routine neutering in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233:109115.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA. Opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories and analgesic adjuvants. In: Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Grimm KA, eds. Lumb & Jones' veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007;241273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Riviere JE, Papich MG. Opioid analgesic drugs. In: Riviere JE, Papich MG, eds. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009;301337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Wotman KL, Utter ME. Effect of treatment with a topical ophthalmic preparation of 1% nalbuphine solution on corneal sensitivity in clinically normal horses. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:223228.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Clark JS, Bentley E, Smith LJ. Evaluation of topical nalbuphine or oral tramadol as analgesics for corneal pain in dogs: a pilot study. Vet Ophthalmol 2011;14:358364.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Chandler HL, Kusewitt DF, Colitz CMH. Modulation of matrix metalloproteinases by ultraviolet radiation in the canine cornea. Vet Ophthalmol 2008;11:135144.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Xiang CD, Batugo M, Gale DC, et alCharacterization of human corneal epithelial cell model as a surrogate for corneal permeability assessment: metabolism and transport. Drug Metab Dispos 2009;37:992998.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Regnier A. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Part 1: drug delivery. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Vol 2. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2007;271287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Jarvinen K, Jarvinen T, Urtti A. Ocular absorption following topical delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1995;16:319.

  • 40. Chen CC, Chang JH, Lee JB, et alHuman corneal epithelial cell viability and morphology after dilute alcohol exposure Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:25932602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Wang HZ, Chang CH, Lin CP, et alUsing MTT viability assay to test the cytotoxicity of antibiotics and steroid to cultured porcine corneal endothelial cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1996;12:3543.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Kim TI, Choi SI, Lee HK, et alMitomycin C induces apoptosis in cultured corneal fibroblasts derived from type II granular corneal dystrophy corneas. Mol Vis 2008;14:12221228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Chang SW, Chou SF, Chuang JL. Mitomycin C potentiates ultraviolet-related cytotoxicity in corneal fibroblasts. Cornea 2008;27:686692.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. Kim TI, Tchah H, Cho EH, et alEvaluation for safety of cultured corneal fibroblasts with cotreatment of alcohol and mitomycin C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:8692.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45. West-Mays JA, Dwivedi D. The keratocyte: corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2006;38:16251631.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Corneal stromal wound healing in refractive surgery: the role of myofibroblasts. Prog Retin Eye Res 1999;18:311356.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. Dayhaw-Barker P. Corneal wound healing: II. The process. Int Contact Lens Clin 1995;22:110116.

  • 48. Denk PO, Knorr M. Effect of heparin on human corneal fibroblast proliferation in vitro with and without growth factor stimulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:342347.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. Teus MA, De Benito-Llopis L, Alió JL. Mitomycin C in corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:487502.

  • 50. Baek SH, Chang JH, Choi SY, et alThe effect of topical corticosteroids on refractive outcome and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1997;13:644652.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51. Calatayud M, Gimeno J, Velez D, et alCharacterization of the intestinal absorption of arsenate, monomethylarsonic acid, and dimethylarsinic acid using the Caco-2 cell line. Chem Res Toxicol 2010;23:547556.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement