Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from adult canine brains

Ji-Hey Lim Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Ji-Hey Lim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Sehwon Koh Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Sehwon Koh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Natasha J. Olby Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Natasha J. Olby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Vet MB, PhD
,
Jorge Piedrahita Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Jorge Piedrahita in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Christopher L. Mariani Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.
Comparative Neuroimmunology and Neurooncology Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Christopher L. Mariani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To isolate and characterize neural stem and progenitor cell populations in the brain of adult dogs.

Animals—7 healthy adult dogs.

Procedures—Dogs (age, 10 to 60 months) were euthanized for reasons unrelated to the study. The subventricular zone (SVZ) adjacent to the lateral ventricles and subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampus were isolated and used to generate single cell suspensions for nonadherent culture. The resulting primary neurospheres were serially passaged to assess self-renewal capacity. Neurospheres were differentiated by the withdrawal of growth factors and the addition of serum. Differentiated and undifferentiated neurospheres were analyzed via reverse transcriptase PCR assay or immunocytochemical staining for markers of pluripotency and neural lineage.

Results—Neurospheres were generated from the SVZ and SGZ in all dogs. The SVZ generated more primary neurospheres than did the SGZ. Serial passage was successful, although few neurospheres could be generated after the fifth passage. Undifferentiated neurospheres were positive for SOX2, nestin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and negative for OCT4 and NANOG. After differentiation, GFAP, neuronal class III β-tubulin, and 2′, 3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase–positive progeny were noted migrating out of the neurospheres.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested the persistence of SOX2-positive, nestin-positive, GFAP-positive, OCT4-negative, and NANOG-negative neural progenitor cells in the SVZ and SGZ regions of mature canine brains, which are capable of producing multiple cell lineages. This study may serve as a basis for future studies investigating the role of these cells in various disease processes, such as neoplasia, or for regenerative purposes.

Abstract

Objective—To isolate and characterize neural stem and progenitor cell populations in the brain of adult dogs.

Animals—7 healthy adult dogs.

Procedures—Dogs (age, 10 to 60 months) were euthanized for reasons unrelated to the study. The subventricular zone (SVZ) adjacent to the lateral ventricles and subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampus were isolated and used to generate single cell suspensions for nonadherent culture. The resulting primary neurospheres were serially passaged to assess self-renewal capacity. Neurospheres were differentiated by the withdrawal of growth factors and the addition of serum. Differentiated and undifferentiated neurospheres were analyzed via reverse transcriptase PCR assay or immunocytochemical staining for markers of pluripotency and neural lineage.

Results—Neurospheres were generated from the SVZ and SGZ in all dogs. The SVZ generated more primary neurospheres than did the SGZ. Serial passage was successful, although few neurospheres could be generated after the fifth passage. Undifferentiated neurospheres were positive for SOX2, nestin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and negative for OCT4 and NANOG. After differentiation, GFAP, neuronal class III β-tubulin, and 2′, 3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase–positive progeny were noted migrating out of the neurospheres.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested the persistence of SOX2-positive, nestin-positive, GFAP-positive, OCT4-negative, and NANOG-negative neural progenitor cells in the SVZ and SGZ regions of mature canine brains, which are capable of producing multiple cell lineages. This study may serve as a basis for future studies investigating the role of these cells in various disease processes, such as neoplasia, or for regenerative purposes.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Mariani was supported by the Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine.

Presented in poster form at the 27th Annual Forum of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Montreal, June 2009.

The authors thank Dr. Troy Ghashghaei for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Mariani (clmarian@ncsu.edu).
  • 1. Kempermann G. Why new neurons? Possible functions for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Neurosci 2002;22:635638.

  • 2. Taupin P, Gage FH. Adult neurogenesis and neural stem cells of the central nervous system in mammals. J Neurosci Res 2002;69:745749.

  • 3. Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2005;28:223250.

  • 4. Duan X, Kang E, Liu CY, et alDevelopment of neural stem cell in the adult brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008;18:108115.

  • 5. Liard O, Segura S, Pascual A, et alIn vitro isolation of neural precursor cells from the adult pig subventricular zone. J Neurosci Methods 2009;182:172179.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 2008;132:645660.

  • 7. Ma DK, Bonaguidi MA, Ming GL, et alAdult neural stem cells in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell Res 2009;19:672682.

  • 8. Ghashghaei HT, Lai C, Anton ES. Neuronal migration in the adult brain: are we there yet? Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:141151.

  • 9. Magavi SS, Leavitt BR, Macklis JD. Induction of neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult mice. Nature 2000;22:951955.

  • 10. Faiz M, Acarin L, Villapol S, et alSubstantial migration of SVZ cells to the cortex results in the generation of new neurons in the excitotoxically damaged immature rat brain. Mol Cell Neurosci 2008;38:170182.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, et alIdentification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 2004;432:396401.

  • 12. Piccirillo SG, Binda E, Fiocco R, et alBrain cancer stem cells. J Mol Med 2009;87:10871095.

  • 13. Kriegstein A, Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu Rev Neurosci 2009;32:149184.

  • 14. Döbrössy M, Busse M, Piroth T, et alNeurorehabilitation with neural transplantation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:692701.

  • 15. Milward EA, Lundberg CG, Ge B, et alIsolation and transplantation of multipotential populations of epidermal growth factor-responsive, neural progenitor cells from the canine brain. J Neurosci Res 1997;50:862871.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Olby N, Harris T, Burr J, et alRecovery of pelvic limb function in dogs following acute intervertebral disc herniations. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:4959.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Smith PM, Jeffery ND. Histological and ultrastructural analysis of white matter damage after naturally-occurring spinal cord injury. Brain Pathol 2006;16:99109.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Thomas R, Duke SE, Wang HJ, et al‘Putting our heads together’: insights into genomic conservation between human and canine intracranial tumors. J Neurooncol 2009;94:333349.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Walton RM, Wolfe JH. Abnormalities in neural progenitor cells in a dog model of lysosomal storage disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2007;66:760769.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Awano T, Johnson GS, Wade CM, et alGenome-wide association analysis reveals a SOD1 mutation in canine degenerative myelopathy that resembles amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:27942799.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Walton RM, Wolfe JH. In vitro growth and differentiation of canine olfactory bulb-derived neural progenitor cells under variable culture conditions. J Neurosci Methods 2008;169:158167.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Stoica G, Lungu G, Martini-Stoica H, et alIdentification of cancer stem cells in dog glioblastoma. Vet Pathol 2009;46:391406.

  • 23. Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992;255:17071710.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, et alNeurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 1998;4:13131317.

  • 25. Ghashghaei HT, Weimer JM, Schmid RS, et alReinduction of ErbB2 in astrocytes promotes radial glial progenitor identity in adult cerebral cortex. Genes Dev 2007;21:32583271.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Jacquet BV, Salinas-Mondragon R, Liang H, et alFoxJ1-dependent gene expression is required for differentiation of radial glia into ependymal cells and a subset of astrocytes in the postnatal brain. Development 2009;136:40214031.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Deleyrolle LP, Reynolds BA. Isolation, expansion, and differentiation of adult Mammalian neural stem and progenitor cells using the neurosphere assay. Methods Mol Biol 2009;549:91101.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Vaags AK, Rosic-Kablar S, Gartley CJ, et alDerivation and characterization of canine embryonic stem cell lines with in vitro and in vivo differentiation potential. Stem Cells 2009;27:329340.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Valenzuela MJ, Dean SK, Sachdev P, et alNeural precursors from canine skin: a new direction for testing autologous cell replacement in the brain. Stem Cells Dev 2008;17:10871094.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Hayes B, Fagerlie SR, Ramakrishnan A, et alDerivation, characterization, and in vitro differentiation of canine embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2008;26:465473.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Singec I, Knoth R, Meyer RP, et alDefining the actual sensitivity and specificity of the neurosphere assay in stem cell biology. Nat Methods 2006;3:801806.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Marshall GP II, Reynolds BA, Laywell ED. Using the neurosphere assay to quantify neural stem cells in vivo. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2007;8:141145.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Reynolds BA, Rietze RL. Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods 2005;2:333336.

  • 34. Pekcec A, Baumgärtner W, Bankstahl JP, et alEffect of aging on neurogenesis in the canine brain. Aging Cell 2008;7:368374.

  • 35. Siwak-Tapp CT, Head E, Muggenburg BA, et alNeurogenesis decreases with age in the canine hippocampus and correlates with cognitive function. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2007;88:249259.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Svendsen CN, Caldwell MA, Shen J, et alLong-term survival of human central nervous system progenitor cells transplanted into a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 1997;148:135146.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Svendsen CN, Skepper J, Rosser AE, et alRestricted growth potential of rat neural precursors as compared to mouse. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1997;99:253258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Svendsen CN, ter Borg MG, Armstrong RJ, et alA new method for the rapid and long term growth of human neural precursor cells. J Neurosci Methods 1998;85:141152.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Scadden DT. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 2006;441:10751079.

  • 40. Singec I, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Neurospheres. In: Gage FH, Kempermann G, Song H, eds. Adult neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2008;119134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Ostenfeld T, Caldwell MA, Prowse KR, et alHuman neural precursor cells express low levels of telomerase in vitro and show diminishing cell proliferation with extensive axonal outgrowth following transplantation. Exp Neurol 2000;164:215226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Wright LS, Prowse KR, Wallace K, et alHuman progenitor cells isolated from the developing cortex undergo decreased neurogenesis and eventual senescence following expansion in vitro. Exp Cell Res 2006;312:21072120.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Wang DD, Bordey A. The astrocyte odyssey. Prog Neurobiol 2008;86:342367.

  • 44. Doetsch F. The glial identity of neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:11271134.

  • 45. Chambers I, Tomlinson SR. The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development 2009;136:23112322.

  • 46. Ferri AL, Cavallaro M, Braida D, et alSox2 deficiency causes neurodegeneration and impaired neurogenesis in the adult mouse brain. Development 2004;131:38053819.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. Suh H, Consiglio A, Ray J, et alIn vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:515528.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. Kim JB, Zaehres H, Wu G, et alPluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 2008;454:646650.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. Lee SH, Jeyapalan JN, Appleby V, et alDynamic methylation and expression of Oct4 in early neural stem cells. J Anat 2010;217:203213.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. Alvarez-Buylla A, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Tramontin AD. A unified hypothesis on the lineage of neural stem cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:287293.

Advertisement