Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface

Thilo Pfau Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, England.

Search for other papers by Thilo Pfau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr.-Ing
,
Narelle C. Stubbs Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Narelle C. Stubbs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
LeeAnn J. Kaiser Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by LeeAnn J. Kaiser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Lucy E. A. Brown Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, England.

Search for other papers by Lucy E. A. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVetMed
, and
Hilary M. Clayton Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Hilary M. Clayton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVMS, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether body lean angle could be predicted from circle radius and speed in horses during lunging and whether an increase in that angle would decrease the degree of movement symmetry (MS).

Animals—11 medium- to high-level dressage horses in competition training.

Procedures—Body lean angle, head MS, and trunk MS were quantified during trotting while horses were instrumented with a 5-sensor global positioning system–enhanced inertial sensor system and lunged on a soft surface. Speed and circle radius were varied and used to calculate predicted body lean angle. Agreement between observed and predicted values was assessed, and the association between lean angle and MS was determined via least squares linear regression.

Results—162 trials totaling 3,368 strides (mean, 21 strides/trial) representing trotting speeds of 1.5 to 4.7 m/s and circle radii of 1.8 to 11.2 m were conducted in both lunging directions. Differences between observed and predicted lean angles were small (mean ± SD difference, −1.2 ± 2.4°) but significantly greater for circling to the right versus left. Movement symmetry values had a larger spread for the head than for the pelvis, and values of all but 1 MS variable changed with body lean angle.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Body lean angle agreed well with predictions from gravitational and centripetal forces, but differences observed between lunging directions emphasize the need to investigate other factors that might influence this variable. For a fair comparison of MS between directions, body lean angle needs to be controlled for or corrected with the regression equations. Whether the regression equations need to be adapted for lame horses requires additional investigation.

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether body lean angle could be predicted from circle radius and speed in horses during lunging and whether an increase in that angle would decrease the degree of movement symmetry (MS).

Animals—11 medium- to high-level dressage horses in competition training.

Procedures—Body lean angle, head MS, and trunk MS were quantified during trotting while horses were instrumented with a 5-sensor global positioning system–enhanced inertial sensor system and lunged on a soft surface. Speed and circle radius were varied and used to calculate predicted body lean angle. Agreement between observed and predicted values was assessed, and the association between lean angle and MS was determined via least squares linear regression.

Results—162 trials totaling 3,368 strides (mean, 21 strides/trial) representing trotting speeds of 1.5 to 4.7 m/s and circle radii of 1.8 to 11.2 m were conducted in both lunging directions. Differences between observed and predicted lean angles were small (mean ± SD difference, −1.2 ± 2.4°) but significantly greater for circling to the right versus left. Movement symmetry values had a larger spread for the head than for the pelvis, and values of all but 1 MS variable changed with body lean angle.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Body lean angle agreed well with predictions from gravitational and centripetal forces, but differences observed between lunging directions emphasize the need to investigate other factors that might influence this variable. For a fair comparison of MS between directions, body lean angle needs to be controlled for or corrected with the regression equations. Whether the regression equations need to be adapted for lame horses requires additional investigation.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Brown was a fourth-year veterinary student at the time of manuscript submission.

Supported by the McPhail endowment.

Address correspondence to Dr. Pfau (tpfau@rvc.ac.uk).
  • 1. Clayton HM, Sha DH. Head and body centre of mass movement in horses trotting on a circular path. Equine Vet J Suppl 2006;(36):462467.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Hobbs SJ, Licka T, Polman R. The difference in kinematics of horses walking, trotting and cantering on a flat and banked 10 m circle. Equine Vet J 2011;43:686694.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Baxter G. Adams and Stashak's lameness in horses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2011.

  • 4. Parkes R, Weller R, Groth A, et alEvidence of the development of ‘domain-restricted’ expertise in the recognition of asymmetric motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse. Equine Vet J 2009;41:112117.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Starke SD, Willems E, May SA, et alVertical head and trunk movement adaptations of sound horses trotting in a circle on a hard surface. Vet J 2012;193:7380.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Walker AM, Wilson AM, Pfau T. Comparison of kinematic symmetry index calculations and the effects of straight and circular trotting. Equine Vet J 2010;42:482487.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Buchner HHF, Obermuller S, Scheidl M. Body centre of mass movement in the lame horse. Equine Vet J Suppl 2001;(33):122127.

  • 8. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor. J Exp Biol 2005;208:25032514.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Starke SD, Witte TH, May SA, et alAccuracy and precision of hind limb foot contact timings of horses determined using a pelvis-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech 2012;45:15221528.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Drake SP. Converting GPS coordinates [phi, lambda, h] to navigation coordinates (ENU). Technical note. Edinburgh, SA, Australia: Defence Science and Technology Organisation Electronics and Surveillance Research Laboratory, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Barker RM. Software support for metrology best practice guide No. 5, guide to eurometros: a guide for users, contributors, and testers. Teddington, London: National Physical Laboratory, 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Uhlir C, Licka T, Kubber P, et alCompensatory movements of horses with a stance phase lameness. Equine Vet J Suppl 1997;(23):102105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Kelmer G, et alObjective determination of pelvic movement during hindlimb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:741747.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. May SA, Wyn-Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness. Equine Vet J 1987;19:185188.

  • 15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Warner SM, Koch TO, Pfau T. Inertial sensors for assessment of back movement in horses during locomotion over ground. Equine Vet J 2010;42:417424.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, et alAssessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor–based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:11561163.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schambardt HC, et alHead and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:7176.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Church E, Walker AM, Wilson AM, et alEvaluation of discriminant analysis based on dorsoventral symmetry indices to quantify hind limb lameness during over ground locomotion in horses. Equine Vet J 2009;41:304308.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Podhajsky A. The complete training of horse and rider. London: The Sportsman's Press, 1967.

  • 21. Rachen-Schöneich G & Schöneich K. Straightening the crooked horse. North Pomfret, Vt: Trafalgar Square Books, 2007;3446.

  • 22. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans. Anim Cogn 2010;13:229238.

  • 23. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in Thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004;92:337352.

  • 24. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, et alLaterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value. Physiol Behav 2008;94:487490.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, et alSocially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 2009;12:611619.

  • 26. Dunbar DC, Macpherson JM, Simmons RW, et alStabilization and mobility of the head, neck and trunk in horses during overground locomotion: comparisons with humans and other primates. J Exp Biol 2008;211:38893907.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Gellman KS, Bertram JEA. The equine nuchal ligament 2: passive dynamic energy exchange in locomotion. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002;15:714.

  • 28. McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus J Exp Biol 2003;206:13251336.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Alexander RM, Maloiy GMO, Hunter B, et alMechanical stresses in fast locomotion of buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and elephant (Loxodonta africana). J Zool Lond 1979;189:135144.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Witte TH, Knill K, Wilson AM. Determination of peak vertical ground reaction force from duty factor in the horse (Equus caballus). J Exp Biol 2004;207:36393648.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, et alGround reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds. J Exp Biol 2004;207:35073514.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Peña A. The Dreyfus model of clinical problem-solving skills acquisition: a critical perspective. Med Educ Online 2010;15:111.

  • 33. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, et alEvidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses. Vet Rec 2006;159:346348.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement