Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface

Thilo Pfau Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, England.

Search for other papers by Thilo Pfau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr.-Ing
,
Narelle C. Stubbs Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Narelle C. Stubbs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
LeeAnn J. Kaiser Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by LeeAnn J. Kaiser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Lucy E. A. Brown Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, England.

Search for other papers by Lucy E. A. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVetMed
, and
Hilary M. Clayton Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for other papers by Hilary M. Clayton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVMS, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether body lean angle could be predicted from circle radius and speed in horses during lunging and whether an increase in that angle would decrease the degree of movement symmetry (MS).

Animals—11 medium- to high-level dressage horses in competition training.

Procedures—Body lean angle, head MS, and trunk MS were quantified during trotting while horses were instrumented with a 5-sensor global positioning system–enhanced inertial sensor system and lunged on a soft surface. Speed and circle radius were varied and used to calculate predicted body lean angle. Agreement between observed and predicted values was assessed, and the association between lean angle and MS was determined via least squares linear regression.

Results—162 trials totaling 3,368 strides (mean, 21 strides/trial) representing trotting speeds of 1.5 to 4.7 m/s and circle radii of 1.8 to 11.2 m were conducted in both lunging directions. Differences between observed and predicted lean angles were small (mean ± SD difference, −1.2 ± 2.4°) but significantly greater for circling to the right versus left. Movement symmetry values had a larger spread for the head than for the pelvis, and values of all but 1 MS variable changed with body lean angle.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Body lean angle agreed well with predictions from gravitational and centripetal forces, but differences observed between lunging directions emphasize the need to investigate other factors that might influence this variable. For a fair comparison of MS between directions, body lean angle needs to be controlled for or corrected with the regression equations. Whether the regression equations need to be adapted for lame horses requires additional investigation.

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether body lean angle could be predicted from circle radius and speed in horses during lunging and whether an increase in that angle would decrease the degree of movement symmetry (MS).

Animals—11 medium- to high-level dressage horses in competition training.

Procedures—Body lean angle, head MS, and trunk MS were quantified during trotting while horses were instrumented with a 5-sensor global positioning system–enhanced inertial sensor system and lunged on a soft surface. Speed and circle radius were varied and used to calculate predicted body lean angle. Agreement between observed and predicted values was assessed, and the association between lean angle and MS was determined via least squares linear regression.

Results—162 trials totaling 3,368 strides (mean, 21 strides/trial) representing trotting speeds of 1.5 to 4.7 m/s and circle radii of 1.8 to 11.2 m were conducted in both lunging directions. Differences between observed and predicted lean angles were small (mean ± SD difference, −1.2 ± 2.4°) but significantly greater for circling to the right versus left. Movement symmetry values had a larger spread for the head than for the pelvis, and values of all but 1 MS variable changed with body lean angle.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Body lean angle agreed well with predictions from gravitational and centripetal forces, but differences observed between lunging directions emphasize the need to investigate other factors that might influence this variable. For a fair comparison of MS between directions, body lean angle needs to be controlled for or corrected with the regression equations. Whether the regression equations need to be adapted for lame horses requires additional investigation.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 257 0 0
Full Text Views 2561 1625 182
PDF Downloads 1107 422 22
Advertisement