Comparison of pharmacokinetic variables for creatinine and iohexol in dogs with various degrees of renal function

Cécile M. Collignon Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Cécile M. Collignon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Reidun Heiene Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway.

Search for other papers by Reidun Heiene in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Yann Queau Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Yann Queau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Brice S. Reynolds Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Brice S. Reynolds in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Amanda J. Craig Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Amanda J. Craig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, M Vet Clin Studies
,
Didier Concordet Ecole nationale vétérinaire de Toulouse, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.
Unité mixte de recherches 1331, Institut national de la recherche agronomique, Toxalim, F-31027 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Didier Concordet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Nathaniel X. Harran Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Nathaniel X. Harran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Unni Risøen Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway.

Search for other papers by Unni Risøen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
David Balouka Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by David Balouka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Mathieu R. Faucher Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Mathieu R. Faucher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Knut A. Eliassen Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway.

Search for other papers by Knut A. Eliassen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Vincent Biourge Research Center, Royal Canin SAS, 30470 Aimargues, France.

Search for other papers by Vincent Biourge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Hervé P. Lefebvre Unité de recherche clinique, Institut national polytechnique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France.

Search for other papers by Hervé P. Lefebvre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To compare pharmacokinetics and clearances of creatinine and iohexol as estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in dogs with various degrees of renal function.

Animals—50 Great Anglo-Francais Tricolor Hounds with various degrees of renal function.

Procedures—Boluses of iohexol (40 mg/kg) and creatinine (647 mg/kg) were injected IV. Blood samples were collected before administration and 5 and 10 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration. Plasma creatinine and iohexol concentrations were assayed via an enzymatic method and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. A noncompartmental approach was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacokinetic variables were compared via a Bland-Altman plot and an ANOVA.

Results—Compared with results for creatinine, iohexol had a significantly higher mean ± SD plasma clearance (3.4 ± 0.8 mL/min/kg vs 3.0 ± 0.7 mL/min/kg) and a significantly lower mean volume of distribution at steady state (250 ± 37 mL/kg vs 539 ± 73 mL/kg), mean residence time (80 ± 31 minutes vs 195 ± 73 minutes), and mean elimination half-life (74 ± 20 minutes vs 173 ± 53 minutes). Despite discrepancies between clearances, especially for high values, the difference was < 0.6 mL/min/kg for 34 (68%) dogs. Three dogs with a low GFR (< 2 mL/min/kg) were classified similarly by both methods.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Plasma iohexol and creatinine clearances can be used interchangeably for screening patients suspected of having chronic kidney disease (ie, low GFR), but large differences may exist for dogs with a GFR within or above the reference range.

Abstract

Objective—To compare pharmacokinetics and clearances of creatinine and iohexol as estimates of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in dogs with various degrees of renal function.

Animals—50 Great Anglo-Francais Tricolor Hounds with various degrees of renal function.

Procedures—Boluses of iohexol (40 mg/kg) and creatinine (647 mg/kg) were injected IV. Blood samples were collected before administration and 5 and 10 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration. Plasma creatinine and iohexol concentrations were assayed via an enzymatic method and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. A noncompartmental approach was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacokinetic variables were compared via a Bland-Altman plot and an ANOVA.

Results—Compared with results for creatinine, iohexol had a significantly higher mean ± SD plasma clearance (3.4 ± 0.8 mL/min/kg vs 3.0 ± 0.7 mL/min/kg) and a significantly lower mean volume of distribution at steady state (250 ± 37 mL/kg vs 539 ± 73 mL/kg), mean residence time (80 ± 31 minutes vs 195 ± 73 minutes), and mean elimination half-life (74 ± 20 minutes vs 173 ± 53 minutes). Despite discrepancies between clearances, especially for high values, the difference was < 0.6 mL/min/kg for 34 (68%) dogs. Three dogs with a low GFR (< 2 mL/min/kg) were classified similarly by both methods.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Plasma iohexol and creatinine clearances can be used interchangeably for screening patients suspected of having chronic kidney disease (ie, low GFR), but large differences may exist for dogs with a GFR within or above the reference range.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 0 0
Full Text Views 1237 1007 210
PDF Downloads 165 97 8
Advertisement