1. Anderson JD, Galuppo LD & Barr BC et alClinical and scintigraphic findings in horses with a bone fragility disorder: 16 cases (1980–2006). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 1694–1699.
2. Arens AM, Barr B & Puchalski SM et alOsteoporosis associated with pulmonary silicosis in an equine bone fragility syndrome. Vet Pathol 2011; 48: 593–615.
3. Durham M, Armstrong C. Fractures and bone deformities in 18 horses with silicosis, in Proceedings. 52nd Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 2006;311–317.
4. Entwistle RC, Sammons SC & Bigley RF et alMaterial properties are related to stress fracture callus and porosity of cortical bone tissue at affected and unaffected sites. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 1272–1279.
5. Gustafson MB, Martin RB & Gibson V et alCalcium buffering is required to maintain bone stiffness in saline solution. J Biomech 1996; 29: 1191–1194.
6. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984; 1: 612–619.
7. Hildebrand T, Laib A & Muller R et alDirect three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1167–1174.
8. Odgaard A, Gundersen HJ. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 1993; 14: 173–182.
9. Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 1997; 185: 67–75.
10. Keaveny TM, Pinilla TP & Crawford RP et alSystematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 1997; 15: 101–110.
11. Les CM, Stover SM & Keyak JH et alStiff and strong compressive properties are associated with brittle post-yield behavior in equine compact bone material. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 607–614.
12. Keaveny TM, Borchers RE & Gibson LJ et alTheoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J Biomech 1993; 26: 599–607.
13. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 954–962.
14. Hayes WC, Carter DR. Postyield behavior of subchondral trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1976; 10: 537–544.
15. Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA. Analysis of bone remodeling. In: Skeletal tissue mechanics. New York: Springer, 1998; 98: 112–113.
16. Arens AM, Puchalski SM & Whitcomb MB et alComparison of scapular ultrasound, physical examination, and serum biomarkers of bone turnover versus bone scintigraphy for detection of equine bone fragility syndrome. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;241: in press.
Advertisement
Objective—To determine morphological and mechanical properties of trabecular bone of horses with a bone fragility syndrome (BFS; including silicate-associated osteoporosis).
Sample—Cylindrical trabecular bone samples from the distal aspects of cadaveric third metacarpal bones of 39 horses (19 horses with a BFS [BFS bone samples] and 20 horses without a BFS [control bone samples]).
Procedures—Bone samples were imaged via micro-CT for determination of bone volume fraction; apparent and mean mineralized bone densities; and trabecular number, thickness, and separation. Bone samples were compressed to failure for determination of apparent elastic modulus and stresses, strains, and strain energy densities for yield, ultimate, and failure loads. Effects of BFS and age of horses on variables were determined.
Results—BFS bone samples had 25% lower bone volume fraction, 28% lower apparent density, 18% lower trabecular number and thickness, and 16% greater trabecular separation versus control bone samples. The BFS bone samples had 22% lower apparent modulus and 32% to 33% lower stresses, 10% to 18% lower strains, and 41 % to 52% lower strain energy densities at yield, ultimate, and failure loads, compared with control bone samples. Differences between groups of bone samples were not detected for mean mineral density and trabecular anisotropy.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that horses with a BFS had osteopenia and compromised trabecular bone function, consistent with bone deformation and pathological fractures that develop in affected horses. Effects of this BFS may be systemic, and bones other than those that are clinically affected had changes in morphological and mechanical properties.
This manuscript represents a portion of a thesis submitted by the first author to the University of California-Davis Department of Biomedical Engineering as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Science degree.
Supported by the Dolly Green Endowment, the Center for Equine Health, the State of California pari-mutuel fund, and contributions by private donors.
Presented as a poster presentation at the Biomechanical Engineering Conference, Palo Alto, Calif, May 2011.
The authors thank Dr. Neil Willits for statistical assistance.