Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem after oral administration of a single dose in dogs

Mario Giorgi Department of Veterinary Clinics, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56122 Pisa, Italy.

Search for other papers by Mario Giorgi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 ChemD, MSPharmacol
,
Diego Angel Portela Department of Veterinary Clinics, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56122 Pisa, Italy.

Search for other papers by Diego Angel Portela in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Gloria Breghi Department of Veterinary Clinics, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56122 Pisa, Italy.

Search for other papers by Gloria Breghi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Angela Briganti Department of Veterinary Clinics, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, 56122 Pisa, Italy.

Search for other papers by Angela Briganti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem after oral administration of a single dose (0.15 or 0.50 mg/kg) and assess any associated antianxiety and sedative effects in dogs.

Animals—8 clinically normal sexually intact male dogs of various breeds.

Procedures—Dogs were assigned to 2 groups (4 dogs/group) and administered zolpidem orally once at a dose of 0.15 or 0.50 mg/kg in a crossover study; each dog received the other treatment once after an interval of 1 week. Blood samples were collected before and at intervals during the 24-hour period following dose administration. For each time point, plasma zolpidem concentration was evaluated via a validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection, and pharmacodynamics were assessed via subjective assessments of sedation and level of agitation and selected clinical variables.

Results—The pharmacokinetic profile of zolpidem in dogs was dose dependent, and the plasma drug concentrations attained were lower than those for humans administered equivalent doses. The lower dose did not result in any clinical or adverse effects, but the higher dose generated paradoxical CNS stimulation of approximately 1 hour's duration and a subsequent short phase of mild sedation. This sedation phase was not considered to be of clinical relevance. The desired clinical effects were not evident at plasma zolpidem concentrations ≤ 30 ng/mL, and the minimal plasma concentration that induced adverse effects was 60 ng/mL.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that zolpidem is not a suitable drug for inducing sedation in dogs.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem after oral administration of a single dose (0.15 or 0.50 mg/kg) and assess any associated antianxiety and sedative effects in dogs.

Animals—8 clinically normal sexually intact male dogs of various breeds.

Procedures—Dogs were assigned to 2 groups (4 dogs/group) and administered zolpidem orally once at a dose of 0.15 or 0.50 mg/kg in a crossover study; each dog received the other treatment once after an interval of 1 week. Blood samples were collected before and at intervals during the 24-hour period following dose administration. For each time point, plasma zolpidem concentration was evaluated via a validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection, and pharmacodynamics were assessed via subjective assessments of sedation and level of agitation and selected clinical variables.

Results—The pharmacokinetic profile of zolpidem in dogs was dose dependent, and the plasma drug concentrations attained were lower than those for humans administered equivalent doses. The lower dose did not result in any clinical or adverse effects, but the higher dose generated paradoxical CNS stimulation of approximately 1 hour's duration and a subsequent short phase of mild sedation. This sedation phase was not considered to be of clinical relevance. The desired clinical effects were not evident at plasma zolpidem concentrations ≤ 30 ng/mL, and the minimal plasma concentration that induced adverse effects was 60 ng/mL.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that zolpidem is not a suitable drug for inducing sedation in dogs.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 108 0 0
Full Text Views 3288 2509 534
PDF Downloads 1339 892 96
Advertisement