Surveillance for Mycobacterium bovis transmission from domestic cattle to wild ruminants in a Mexican wildlife-livestock interface area

Luis F. Cisneros Committee for Promoting and Protecting Livestock, km 21.5 carretera Aguascalientes-Zacatecas, San Francisco de los Romo, Aguascalientes 20300, México.

Search for other papers by Luis F. Cisneros in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Arturo G. Valdivia Agricultural Sciences Centre, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20131, México.

Search for other papers by Arturo G. Valdivia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Kenneth Waldrup Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control, 401 E Franklin St, Ste 210, El Paso, TX 79901.

Search for other papers by Kenneth Waldrup in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Efrén Díaz-Aparicio National Center for Disciplinary Research in Microbiology, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agricolas y Pecuarias, km 15.5, carretera México-Toluca, Cuajimalpa DF 05110, México.

Search for other papers by Efrén Díaz-Aparicio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Armando Martínez-de-Anda Agricultural Sciences Centre, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20131, México.

Search for other papers by Armando Martínez-de-Anda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Carlos R. Cruz-Vázquez Instituto Tecnológico El Llano, Aguascalientes 20041, México.

Search for other papers by Carlos R. Cruz-Vázquez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Raúl Ortiz Agricultural Sciences Centre, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes 20131, México.

Search for other papers by Raúl Ortiz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To assess the prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and wild ruminants (WRs) in a wildlife-livestock interface area (WLIA) of the Mexican highland plateau.

Animals—24,400 cattle from 793 herds (including 17,351 commercially slaughtered cattle) and 142 WRs (110 white-tailed deer [Odocoileus virginianus], 20 red deer [Cervus elaphus], and 12 North American elk [Cervus canadensis]) harvested via controlled hunting.

Procedures—Cattle were serially tested for M bovis infection via caudal fold tuberculin and comparative cervical tuberculin tests during field surveillance. Carcasses of cattle and WRs were inspected for gross lesions; samples suggestive of tuberculosis were analyzed via histologic evaluation and mycobacterial culture (HMC). A PCR assay to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms was performed to confirm positive results of HMC.

Results—WRs had inflammatory lesions in lungs and lymph nodes, although HMC results did not indicate M bovis infection. Eight cattle had positive results for both tuberculin tests, and 31 had positive results for HMC of grossly detected lesions; all were from 7 herds, and ≥ 1 cow in each herd had positive PCR assay results. These 7 herds were depopulated; adjacent herds and herds related via commerce were quarantined. Calculated true prevalence of M bovis infection was 0.86% (95% confidence interval, 0.24% to 1.49%) in cattle; M bovis was not detected in any WRs.

Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceM bovis infection was present in cattle. Although transmission to WRs in this WLIA was not detected, diagnosis and prevention activities should be implemented and consolidated to prevent potential M bovis transmission between cattle and WRs.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and wild ruminants (WRs) in a wildlife-livestock interface area (WLIA) of the Mexican highland plateau.

Animals—24,400 cattle from 793 herds (including 17,351 commercially slaughtered cattle) and 142 WRs (110 white-tailed deer [Odocoileus virginianus], 20 red deer [Cervus elaphus], and 12 North American elk [Cervus canadensis]) harvested via controlled hunting.

Procedures—Cattle were serially tested for M bovis infection via caudal fold tuberculin and comparative cervical tuberculin tests during field surveillance. Carcasses of cattle and WRs were inspected for gross lesions; samples suggestive of tuberculosis were analyzed via histologic evaluation and mycobacterial culture (HMC). A PCR assay to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms was performed to confirm positive results of HMC.

Results—WRs had inflammatory lesions in lungs and lymph nodes, although HMC results did not indicate M bovis infection. Eight cattle had positive results for both tuberculin tests, and 31 had positive results for HMC of grossly detected lesions; all were from 7 herds, and ≥ 1 cow in each herd had positive PCR assay results. These 7 herds were depopulated; adjacent herds and herds related via commerce were quarantined. Calculated true prevalence of M bovis infection was 0.86% (95% confidence interval, 0.24% to 1.49%) in cattle; M bovis was not detected in any WRs.

Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceM bovis infection was present in cattle. Although transmission to WRs in this WLIA was not detected, diagnosis and prevention activities should be implemented and consolidated to prevent potential M bovis transmission between cattle and WRs.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 117 0 0
Full Text Views 940 690 76
PDF Downloads 190 87 2
Advertisement