Evaluation of the safety of spinosad and milbemycin 5-oxime orally administered to Collies with the MDR1 gene mutation

Jeffrey G. Sherman Elanco Animal Health, 2001 W Main St, PO Box 708, Greenfield, IN 46140.

Search for other papers by Jeffrey G. Sherman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Allan J. Paul Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Allan J. Paul in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Lawrence D. Firkins Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Lawrence D. Firkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, MBA

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether signs of avermectin (AVM)-milbemycin (MB) toxicosis would be evident in AVM-MB–sensitive Collies after treatment with an experimental formulation of spinosad alone or spinosad combined with MB 5-oxime (MBO) at doses up to 5 and 10 times the MBO maximum label dose.

Animals—20 adult Collies homozygous or heterozygous for the MDR1 gene mutation that had signs of toxicosis after oral administration of ivermectin.

Procedures—On the basis of AVM-MB sensitivity score, each dog was assigned in a randomized block design to 1 of 5 treatment groups (control group, 300 mg of spinosad/kg [5 times maximum label dose], 180 mg of spinosad/kg with 3 mg of MBO/kg [3 times maximum MBO label dose], 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 5 mg of MBO/kg, and 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 10 mg of MBO/kg). Treatments were administered orally as a sequence of single doses during 5 consecutive days. After a 28-day washout period, treatment sequences were repeated. Posttreatment observation and scoring by blinded observers were conducted to specifically include neurologic abnormalities typical of AVM-MB toxicosis, such as signs of depression, ataxia, mydriasis, and hypersalivation.

Results—No signs of AVM-MB toxicosis were attributed to treatment in any dog during the study.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that oral administration of spinosad at 300 mg/kg alone or in combination with MBO at doses up to 10 mg/kg did not cause signs of AVM-MB toxicosis in AVM-MB–sensitive dogs with the MDR1 gene mutation.

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether signs of avermectin (AVM)-milbemycin (MB) toxicosis would be evident in AVM-MB–sensitive Collies after treatment with an experimental formulation of spinosad alone or spinosad combined with MB 5-oxime (MBO) at doses up to 5 and 10 times the MBO maximum label dose.

Animals—20 adult Collies homozygous or heterozygous for the MDR1 gene mutation that had signs of toxicosis after oral administration of ivermectin.

Procedures—On the basis of AVM-MB sensitivity score, each dog was assigned in a randomized block design to 1 of 5 treatment groups (control group, 300 mg of spinosad/kg [5 times maximum label dose], 180 mg of spinosad/kg with 3 mg of MBO/kg [3 times maximum MBO label dose], 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 5 mg of MBO/kg, and 300 mg of spinosad/kg with 10 mg of MBO/kg). Treatments were administered orally as a sequence of single doses during 5 consecutive days. After a 28-day washout period, treatment sequences were repeated. Posttreatment observation and scoring by blinded observers were conducted to specifically include neurologic abnormalities typical of AVM-MB toxicosis, such as signs of depression, ataxia, mydriasis, and hypersalivation.

Results—No signs of AVM-MB toxicosis were attributed to treatment in any dog during the study.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that oral administration of spinosad at 300 mg/kg alone or in combination with MBO at doses up to 10 mg/kg did not cause signs of AVM-MB toxicosis in AVM-MB–sensitive dogs with the MDR1 gene mutation.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 111 0 0
Full Text Views 9113 8777 7233
PDF Downloads 377 180 21
Advertisement