Quantitative differences in activities of back and pelvic limb muscles during walking and trotting between chronically lame and nonlame horses

Hafsa Zaneb Movement Science Group, Clinic for Orthopaedics, Veterinary Medicine University, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.

Search for other papers by Hafsa Zaneb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MSc
,
Verena Kaufmann Movement Science Group, Clinic for Orthopaedics, Veterinary Medicine University, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.

Search for other papers by Verena Kaufmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Mag med vet
,
Christian Stanek Movement Science Group, Clinic for Orthopaedics, Veterinary Medicine University, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.

Search for other papers by Christian Stanek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet
,
Christian Peham Movement Science Group, Clinic for Orthopaedics, Veterinary Medicine University, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.

Search for other papers by Christian Peham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr techn
, and
Theresia F. Licka Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland.

Search for other papers by Theresia F. Licka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet

Abstract

Objective—To assess differences in activities of back and pelvic limb muscles by use of surface electromyography (SEMG) in chronically lame and nonlame horses during walking and trotting.

Animals—12 nonlame horses and 12 horses with unilateral chronic mild to moderate pelvic limb lameness.

Procedures—On each horse, bipolar electrodes were attached to the skin over the midpoints of the right and left longissimus thoracis (Lot), semitendinosus (Set), biceps femoris (Bif), gluteus medius (Glm), and extensor digitorum longus (Edl) muscles. For each muscle, synchronous kinematic and SEMG recordings were made during walking and trotting on a treadmill; mean, maximum, and minimum muscle activities and maximum-to-mean and minimum-to-mean activity ratios were determined. For each lame or nonlame horse, data from both pelvic limbs were averaged; in lame horses, data from the nonlame and lame pelvic limbs were also examined separately (NL-L and L-L values, respectively). Comparisons were made among the 4 data sets and between gaits.

Results—During walking, the NL-L maximum-to-mean ratios for Bif and Glm muscles were significantly greater and in lame horses, L-L and NL-L minimum-to-mean ratios for Set, Bif, Glm, and Lot muscles were significantly less than those for nonlame horses. During trotting, minimum-to-mean ratios for Set, Glm, and Lot muscles in lame horses were significantly lower than those for nonlame horses. Activity of the Edl muscle was not affected by lameness.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In lame horses, variation in muscle use was detectable via SEMG. In chronically lame horses, back and pelvic limb muscle activities were affected differently during walking and trotting.

Abstract

Objective—To assess differences in activities of back and pelvic limb muscles by use of surface electromyography (SEMG) in chronically lame and nonlame horses during walking and trotting.

Animals—12 nonlame horses and 12 horses with unilateral chronic mild to moderate pelvic limb lameness.

Procedures—On each horse, bipolar electrodes were attached to the skin over the midpoints of the right and left longissimus thoracis (Lot), semitendinosus (Set), biceps femoris (Bif), gluteus medius (Glm), and extensor digitorum longus (Edl) muscles. For each muscle, synchronous kinematic and SEMG recordings were made during walking and trotting on a treadmill; mean, maximum, and minimum muscle activities and maximum-to-mean and minimum-to-mean activity ratios were determined. For each lame or nonlame horse, data from both pelvic limbs were averaged; in lame horses, data from the nonlame and lame pelvic limbs were also examined separately (NL-L and L-L values, respectively). Comparisons were made among the 4 data sets and between gaits.

Results—During walking, the NL-L maximum-to-mean ratios for Bif and Glm muscles were significantly greater and in lame horses, L-L and NL-L minimum-to-mean ratios for Set, Bif, Glm, and Lot muscles were significantly less than those for nonlame horses. During trotting, minimum-to-mean ratios for Set, Glm, and Lot muscles in lame horses were significantly lower than those for nonlame horses. Activity of the Edl muscle was not affected by lameness.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In lame horses, variation in muscle use was detectable via SEMG. In chronically lame horses, back and pelvic limb muscle activities were affected differently during walking and trotting.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 80 0 0
Full Text Views 1061 736 108
PDF Downloads 348 148 12
Advertisement