Evaluation of an osmotic pump for fentanyl administration in cats as a model for nondomestic felids

John M. Sykes IV Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by John M. Sykes IV in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sherry Cox Department of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Sherry Cox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Edward C. Ramsay Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

Search for other papers by Edward C. Ramsay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the reliability of an SC implanted osmotic pump (OP) for fentanyl administration in cats and to compare serum concentrations of fentanyl delivered via an OP and a transdermal patch (TP).

Animals—8 spayed female cats.

Procedures—In a crossover design, cats received fentanyl at 25 μg/h via a TP or an OP. All cats were anesthetized for the pump or patch placement (0 hours) and again when it was removed (96 hours). Venous blood samples were collected for measurement of serum fentanyl concentrations at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours and at 24 and 48 hours after device removal. After a 3-week washout period, the experiment was repeated with each cat receiving the other treatment.

Results—Mean serum fentanyl concentrations at 24, 36, 72, and 96 hours were greater when the OP was used than when the TP was used. Mean residence time and half-life were greater when the TP was used. Fentanyl concentration changed significantly faster in initial and elimination phases when the OP was used. Marked interindividual variation in serum fentanyl concentrations was evident with both administration methods. No adverse effects were evident with either method.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Use of the OP to administer fentanyl to cats resulted in a shorter initial lag phase to a therapeutic serum concentration, higher bioavailability, and faster elimination after removal, compared with use of a TP. These advantages, in addition to the inability of cats to remove the OP, may make OPs useful for fentanyl administration in nondomestic felids.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the reliability of an SC implanted osmotic pump (OP) for fentanyl administration in cats and to compare serum concentrations of fentanyl delivered via an OP and a transdermal patch (TP).

Animals—8 spayed female cats.

Procedures—In a crossover design, cats received fentanyl at 25 μg/h via a TP or an OP. All cats were anesthetized for the pump or patch placement (0 hours) and again when it was removed (96 hours). Venous blood samples were collected for measurement of serum fentanyl concentrations at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours and at 24 and 48 hours after device removal. After a 3-week washout period, the experiment was repeated with each cat receiving the other treatment.

Results—Mean serum fentanyl concentrations at 24, 36, 72, and 96 hours were greater when the OP was used than when the TP was used. Mean residence time and half-life were greater when the TP was used. Fentanyl concentration changed significantly faster in initial and elimination phases when the OP was used. Marked interindividual variation in serum fentanyl concentrations was evident with both administration methods. No adverse effects were evident with either method.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Use of the OP to administer fentanyl to cats resulted in a shorter initial lag phase to a therapeutic serum concentration, higher bioavailability, and faster elimination after removal, compared with use of a TP. These advantages, in addition to the inability of cats to remove the OP, may make OPs useful for fentanyl administration in nondomestic felids.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Sykes' present address is Global Health Program, Wildlife Conservation Society/Bronx Zoo, 2300 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10460.

Supported by a grant from the Morris Animal Foundation (D05ZO067).

Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, Tampa, Fla, September 2006.

The authors thank Dr. Arnold Saxton and Suman Duvvuru for statistical analysis, Kim Abney for fentanyl assay assistance, and Tammy Moyers and Nancy Zagaya for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Sykes.
  • 1.

    Lerche P, Muir W. Analgesia. In: Carroll GL, ed. Small animal anesthesia and analgesia. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing Professional, 2008;123142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Isaza R. Remote drug delivery. In: West G, Heard D, Caulkett N, eds. Zoo and wildlife immobilization and anesthesia. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing Professional, 2007;6174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Egger CM, Glerum LE, Allen SW, et al. Plasma fentanyl concentrations in awake cats and cats undergoing anesthesia and ovariohysterectomy using transdermal administration. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:229236.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Lee DD, Papich MG, Hardie EM. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in cats. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:672677.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Scherk-Nixon M. A study of the use of a transdermal fentanyl patch in cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996;32:1924.

  • 6.

    Egger CM, Duke T, Archer J, et al. Comparison of plasma fentanyl concentrations by using three transdermal fentanyl patch sizes in dogs. Vet Surg 1998;27:159166.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Foley PL, Henderson AL, Bissonette EA, et al. Evaluation of fentanyl transdermal patches in rabbits: blood concentrations and physiologic response. Comp Med 2001;51:239244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Wilkinson AC, Thomas ML, Morse BC. Evaluation of a transdermal fentanyl system in yucatan miniature pigs. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2001;40:1216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Harvey-Clark CJ, Glilespie K, Riggs RW. Transdermal fentanyl compared with parenteral buprenorphine in post-surgical pain in swine: a case study. Lab Anim 2000;34:386398.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Carroll GL, Hooper RN, Boothe DM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in goats. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:986991.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Franks JN, Boothe HW, Taylor L, et al. Evaluation of transdermal fentanyl patches for analgesia in cats undergoing onychectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:10131020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Yackey M, Ilkiw JE, Pascoe PJ, et al. Effect of transdermally administered fentanyl on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2004;31:183189.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Kyles AE, Papich M, Hardie EM. Disposition of transdermally administered fentanyl in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:715719.

  • 14.

    Robinson TM, Kruse-Elliott KT, Markel MD, et al. A comparison of transdermal fentanyl versus epidural morphine for analgesia in dogs undergoing major orthopedic surgery. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999;35:95100.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    de Rojas TC, Goldstein BD. Effects of 2,5-hexanedione on deefferented muscle spindle position sensitivity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1990;103:354363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Baskin DS, Widmayer MA, Browning JL, et al. Evaluation of delayed treatment of focal cerebral ischemia with three selective kappa-opioid agonists in cats. Stroke 1994;25:20472053.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Kasamatsu T, Schmidt EK. Continuous and direct infusion of drug solutions in the brain of awake animals: implementation, strengths and pitfalls. Brain Res Protoc 1997;1:5769.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Gellasch KL, Kruse-Elliott KT, Osmond CS, et al. Comparison of transdermal administration of fentanyl versus intramuscular administration of butorphanol for analgesia after onychectomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:10201024.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Glerum LE, Egger CM, Allen SW, et al. Analgesic effect of the transdermal fentanyl patch during and after feline ovariohysterectomy. Vet Surg 2001;30:351358.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Robertson SA, Taylor PM, W SJ, et al. Relationship between plasma concentrations and analgesia after intravenous fentanyl and disposition after other routes of administration in cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005;28:8793.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Davidson CD, Pettifer GR, Henry JD Jr. Plasma fentanyl concentrations and analgesic effects during full or partial exposure to transdermal fentanyl patches in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:700705.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Varvel JR, Shafer SL, Hwang SS, et al. Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1989;70:928934.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Peng PWH, Sandler AN. A review of the use of fentanyl analgesia in the management of acute pain in adults. Anesthesiology 1999;90:576599.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Reilly CS, Wood AJ, Wood M. Variability of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in man. Computer predicted plasma concentrations for three intravenous dosage regimens. Anaesthesia 1985;40:837843.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    McClain DA, Hug CC Jr. Intravenous fentanyl kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980;28:106114.

Advertisement