• 1.

    Olbrich VH, Mosing MA. Comparison of the analgesic effects of caudal epidural methadone and lidocaine in the horse. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:156164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Ganidagli S, Cetin H, Biricik HS, et al. Comparison of ropivacaine with a combination of ropivacaine and fentanyl for the caudal epidural anaesthesia of mares. Vet Rec 2004;13:329332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Doherty TJ, Geiser DR, Rohrbach BW. Effect of high volume epidural morphine, ketamine and butorphanol on halothane minimum alveolar concentration in ponies. Equine Vet J 1997;29:370373.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Natalini CC, Linardi RL. Analgesic effects of epidural administration of hydromorphone in horses. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:1115.

  • 5.

    Natalini CC, Robinson EP. Effects of epidural opioid analgesics on heart rate, arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature and behaviour in horses. Vet Ther 2003;4:364375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Mircica E, Clutton RE, Kyles KW, et al. Problems associated with perioperative morphine in horses: a retrospective case analysis. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:147155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    deRossi R, Sampaio FB, Varela JV, et al. Perineal analgesia and hemodynamic effects of the epidural administration of meperidine or hyperbaric bupivacaine in conscious horses. Can Vet J 2004;45:4247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Price J, Catriona S, Welsh EM, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003;30:124137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Spadavecchia C, Andersen OK, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. Investigation of the facilitation of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex evoked by repeated transcutaneous electrical stimulations as a measure of temporal summation in conscious horses. Am J Vet Res 2004;65:901908.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Redua MA, Valadao CAA, Duque JC, et al. The pre-emptive effect of epidural ketamine on wound sensitivity in horses tested by using von Frey filaments. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002;29:200206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    You HJ, Colpaert FC, Arendt-Nielsen L. Nociceptive spinal withdrawal reflexes but not spinal dorsal horn wide-dynamic range neuron activities are specifically inhibited by halothane anaesthesia in spinalized rats. Eur J Neurosci 2005;22:354360.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Kim J, Yao A, Atherley R, et al. Neurons in the ventral spinal cord are more depressed by isoflurane, halothane and propofol than are neurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Anesth Analg 2007;105:10201026.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Stienen PJ, van den Brom WE, de Groot HNM, et al. Differences between primary somatosensory cortex- and vertex-derived somatosensory evoked potentials in the rat. Brain Res 2004;1030:256266.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Banoub M, Tetzlaff JE, Schubert A. Pharmacologic and physiologic influences affecting sensory evoked potentials. Anesthesiology 2003;99:716737.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    de Haan P, Kalkman CJ, Ubags LH, et al. A comparison of the sensitivity of epidural and myogenic transcranial motor-evoked responses in the detection of acute spinal cord ischemia in the rabbit. Anesth Analg 1996;83:10221027.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Fehlings MG, Tator CH, Dean Linden R, et al. Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the rat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:6578.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Shanker HS, Winkler T, Stålberg E, et al. Evaluation of traumatic cord edema using evoked potentials recorded from the spinal epidural space. J Neurol Sci 1991;102:150162.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Winkler T, Sharma HS, Stålberg E, et al. Benzodiazepine receptors influence spinal cord evoked potentials and edema following trauma to the rat spinal cord. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1997;70:216219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Winkler T, Sharma HS, Stålberg E, et al. Spinal cord evoked potentials and edema in the pathophysiology of rat spinal cord injury. Involvement of nitric acid. Amino Acids 1988;14:131139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Hallstrom YT, Lindblom U, Meyerson BA, et al. Epidurally recorded cervical spinal activity evoked by electrical and mechanical stimulation in pain patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;74:175185.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Britt RH, Ryan TP. Use of a flexible epidural stimulating electrode for intraoperative monitoring of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials. Spine 1986;11:348351.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Jeanmonod D, Sindou M, Mauguiere F. The human cervical and lumbo-sacral evoked elektrospinogram. Data from intra-operative spinal cord surface recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;80:477489.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Kumar A, Bhattacharya A, Makhija N. Evoked potential monitoring in anaesthesia and analgesia. Anaesthesia 2000;55:225241.

  • 24.

    van Oostrom H, Stienen PJ, van den Bos R, et al. Somatosensoryevoked potentials indicate increased unpleasantness of noxious stimuli in response to increasing stimulus intensities in the rat. Brain Res Bull 2007;71:404409.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Bromm B, Lorenz J. Neurophysiological evaluation of pain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;107:227253.

  • 26.

    Shaw FZ, Chen RF, Tsao HW, et al. Comparison of touch- and laser heat-evoked cortical field potentials in conscious rats. Brain Res 1999;824:183196.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Yaksh TL. Opioid receptor systems and the endorphins: a review of their spinal organization. J Neurosurg 1987;67:157176.

  • 28.

    Dickenson AH. Spinal cord pharmacology of pain. Br J Anaesth 1995;75:193200.

  • 29.

    Kelly DJ, Ahmad M, Brull SJ. Preemptive analgesia I: physiological pathways and pharmacological modalities. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:10001010.

  • 30.

    Yaksh TL. Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principles of action. Pain 1981;11:293346.

  • 31.

    Yeomans DC, Cooper BY, Vierck CJ Jr. Comparisons of dose-dependent effects of systemic morphine on flexion reflex components and operant avoidance responses of awake non-human primates. Brain Res 1995;670:297302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Carpenter KJ, Chapman V, Dickenson AH. Neuronal inhibitory effects of methadone are predominantly opioid receptor mediated in the rat spinal cord in vivo. Eur J Pain 2000;4:1926.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Clarke KW, Paton BS. Combined use of detomidine with opiates in the horse. Equine Vet J 1988;20:331334.

  • 34.

    Barter LS, Mark LO, Jinks SL, et al. Immobilizing doses of halothane, isoflurane or propofol, do not preferentially depress noxious heat-evoked responses of rat lumbar dorsal horn neurons with ascending projections. Anesth Analg 2008;106:985990.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Jinks SL, Martin JT, Carstens MDE, et al. Peri-MAC depression of a nociceptive withdrawal reflex is accompanied by reduced dorsal horn activity with halothane but not isoflurane. Anesthesiology 2003;98:11281138.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Use of epidurally derived evoked potentials for quantification of caudal nociception in ponies

Johannes P. A. M. van LoonDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Johannes P. A. M. van Loon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Peter J. StienenDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Peter J. Stienen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Arie DoornenbalDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Arie Doornenbal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ludo J. HellebrekersDepartments of Equine Sciences and Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Ludo J. Hellebrekers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether epidurally derived evoked potentials (EPs) can be used to reliably assess nociception and antinociception in ponies.

Animals—7 ponies.

Procedures—EPs and electromyograms (EMGs) from the quadriceps femoris muscles were recorded simultaneously, following electrical stimulation applied to the distal portion of the hind limb. The effect of increasing stimulus intensity, conduction velocities of the stimulated nerves, effect of epidurally applied methadone, and effect of systemically administered propofol were evaluated.

Results—In the EP and EMG waveforms, 2 distinct complexes, the EP N25 and P50 and the EMG P27 and N62, respectively, were identified. On the basis of their latency and calculated conduction velocities, the EP P50 and EMG N62 were considered to be related to nociception (AD-mediated). All complexes increased significantly in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity and decreased significantly following epidural administration of methadone or systemic administration of propofol.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Although the experimental setup allowed successful discrimination between tactile- and nociceptive-associated responses, the identified EPs, considered to reflect activity in the spinal cord, could not be definitively differentiated from activity in the lumbosacral epaxial musculature. Further research is required to refine measurement techniques to allow for discrimination between these 2 signals. Similar to other species, neurophysiologic variables such as EPs could potentially become a useful additional tool in quantifying nociception in equidae.

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether epidurally derived evoked potentials (EPs) can be used to reliably assess nociception and antinociception in ponies.

Animals—7 ponies.

Procedures—EPs and electromyograms (EMGs) from the quadriceps femoris muscles were recorded simultaneously, following electrical stimulation applied to the distal portion of the hind limb. The effect of increasing stimulus intensity, conduction velocities of the stimulated nerves, effect of epidurally applied methadone, and effect of systemically administered propofol were evaluated.

Results—In the EP and EMG waveforms, 2 distinct complexes, the EP N25 and P50 and the EMG P27 and N62, respectively, were identified. On the basis of their latency and calculated conduction velocities, the EP P50 and EMG N62 were considered to be related to nociception (AD-mediated). All complexes increased significantly in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity and decreased significantly following epidural administration of methadone or systemic administration of propofol.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Although the experimental setup allowed successful discrimination between tactile- and nociceptive-associated responses, the identified EPs, considered to reflect activity in the spinal cord, could not be definitively differentiated from activity in the lumbosacral epaxial musculature. Further research is required to refine measurement techniques to allow for discrimination between these 2 signals. Similar to other species, neurophysiologic variables such as EPs could potentially become a useful additional tool in quantifying nociception in equidae.

Contributor Notes

The authors thank Kuei-Ming Chang, Marjon van der Kraats, and Machteld van Dierendonck for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. van Loon.