Effect of remifentanil on requirements for propofol administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system for maintaining anesthesia in dogs

Suzane L. Beier Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-000, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Suzane L. Beier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Antonio J. de Araujo Aguiar Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-000, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Antonio J. de Araujo Aguiar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Pedro T. G. Vianna Department of Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-000, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Pedro T. G. Vianna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Cláudio R. S. Mattoso Department of Clinical Medicine and Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-000, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Cláudio R. S. Mattoso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MSc
, and
Flavio Massone Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-000, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Flavio Massone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effect of remifentanil administered by use of a constant rate infusion on the predicted plasma concentration (Cppredicted) of propofol required to prevent awareness in 50% of anesthetized dogs (Cp50predicted).

Animals—6 healthy dogs.

Procedures—Each dog received 2 treatments (1-week interval): induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol alone and induction of anesthesia with propofol and maintenance of anesthesia by use of propofol and a constant rate infusion of remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg/min). To induce anesthesia, propofol was administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system to achieve Cppredicted of 6.0 μg/mL. Propofol Cppredicted was adjusted in 0.5 μg/mL increments or decrements; the motor response to a supramaximal electrical nociceptive stimulus was assessed after each change to determine Cp50predicted (mean of the highest Cppredicted at which gross purposeful movement was detected in response to stimulation and the lowest Cppredicted at which such movement was not detected).

Results—Mean ± SD duration of anesthesia for dogs receiving propofol (148 ± 35 minutes) and dogs receiving propofol-remifentanil treatment (141 ± 28 minutes) did not differ. Overall mean propofol Cppredicted for induction of anesthesia was 6.0 ± 0.5 μg/mL. For maintenance of anesthesia, propofol Cp50predicted was significantly reduced following addition of remifentanil to the protocol (2.0 ± 0.5 μg/mL vs 0.9 ± 0.4 μg/mL; 55% decrease).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In nonpremedicated dogs, propofol Cp50predicted of 6.0 μg/mL may be recommended for induction of anesthesia. Propofol requirements for maintaining target-controlled infusion system–based anesthesia were reduced via infusion of remifentanil at a rate of 0.3 μg/kg/min.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effect of remifentanil administered by use of a constant rate infusion on the predicted plasma concentration (Cppredicted) of propofol required to prevent awareness in 50% of anesthetized dogs (Cp50predicted).

Animals—6 healthy dogs.

Procedures—Each dog received 2 treatments (1-week interval): induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol alone and induction of anesthesia with propofol and maintenance of anesthesia by use of propofol and a constant rate infusion of remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg/min). To induce anesthesia, propofol was administered by use of a target-controlled infusion system to achieve Cppredicted of 6.0 μg/mL. Propofol Cppredicted was adjusted in 0.5 μg/mL increments or decrements; the motor response to a supramaximal electrical nociceptive stimulus was assessed after each change to determine Cp50predicted (mean of the highest Cppredicted at which gross purposeful movement was detected in response to stimulation and the lowest Cppredicted at which such movement was not detected).

Results—Mean ± SD duration of anesthesia for dogs receiving propofol (148 ± 35 minutes) and dogs receiving propofol-remifentanil treatment (141 ± 28 minutes) did not differ. Overall mean propofol Cppredicted for induction of anesthesia was 6.0 ± 0.5 μg/mL. For maintenance of anesthesia, propofol Cp50predicted was significantly reduced following addition of remifentanil to the protocol (2.0 ± 0.5 μg/mL vs 0.9 ± 0.4 μg/mL; 55% decrease).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—In nonpremedicated dogs, propofol Cp50predicted of 6.0 μg/mL may be recommended for induction of anesthesia. Propofol requirements for maintaining target-controlled infusion system–based anesthesia were reduced via infusion of remifentanil at a rate of 0.3 μg/kg/min.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 54 0 0
Full Text Views 1088 777 114
PDF Downloads 359 186 20
Advertisement