Comparison of recovery from anesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane in healthy dogs

Luis A. Lopez Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Luis A. Lopez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVZ
,
Erik H. Hofmeister Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Erik H. Hofmeister in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MA
,
Juan C. Pavez Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Juan C. Pavez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MV
, and
Benjamin M. Brainard Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Benjamin M. Brainard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD

Abstract

Objective—To determine the quality and speed of recovery from anesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane and determine end-tidal inhalant concentration at certain events during recovery in healthy dogs.

Animals—11 healthy dogs.

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced with propofol (IV), and dogs were assigned by use of a crossover design to receive isoflurane at 2.0%, sevoflurane at 3.2%, or desflurane at 11% end-tidal concentrations. Direct blood pressure was monitored throughout the 120 minutes of anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the circuit was flushed with oxygen, and the time to specific events in recovery and overall quality of recovery were assessed. Blood gas concentrations were measured prior to anesthesia and after recovery.

Results—Dogs in the desflurane group had the shortest time to standing (11.7 ± 5.1 minutes), followed by dogs in the sevoflurane group (18.6 ± 7.5 minutes) and dogs in the isoflurane group (26.3 ± 7.2 minutes). There was no difference for recovery quality among groups. Arterial blood pressure was higher in the sevoflurane group than in the desflurane group at 10 and 15 minutes and in the isoflurane group at 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 105, and 120 minutes. There were no significant differences among groups with respect to blood gas concentrations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that in dogs for which a short interval to standing is desired, desflurane is the best selection, followed by sevoflurane.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the quality and speed of recovery from anesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane and determine end-tidal inhalant concentration at certain events during recovery in healthy dogs.

Animals—11 healthy dogs.

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced with propofol (IV), and dogs were assigned by use of a crossover design to receive isoflurane at 2.0%, sevoflurane at 3.2%, or desflurane at 11% end-tidal concentrations. Direct blood pressure was monitored throughout the 120 minutes of anesthesia. At the end of anesthesia, the circuit was flushed with oxygen, and the time to specific events in recovery and overall quality of recovery were assessed. Blood gas concentrations were measured prior to anesthesia and after recovery.

Results—Dogs in the desflurane group had the shortest time to standing (11.7 ± 5.1 minutes), followed by dogs in the sevoflurane group (18.6 ± 7.5 minutes) and dogs in the isoflurane group (26.3 ± 7.2 minutes). There was no difference for recovery quality among groups. Arterial blood pressure was higher in the sevoflurane group than in the desflurane group at 10 and 15 minutes and in the isoflurane group at 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 105, and 120 minutes. There were no significant differences among groups with respect to blood gas concentrations.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that in dogs for which a short interval to standing is desired, desflurane is the best selection, followed by sevoflurane.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Hofmeister (kaastel@gmail.com).
  • 1.

    Steffey EP. Overview of veterinary anesthesia. In: Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ, eds. Lumb & Jones' veterinary anesthesia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1996;298.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Preckel B, Mullenheim J, Hoff J, et al. Haemodynamic changes during halothane, sevoflurane, and desflurane anaesthesia in dogs before and after induction of severe heart failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:797806.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Gare M, Schwabe DA, Hettrick DA, et al. Desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane affect left atrial active and passive mechanical properties and impair left atrial-left ventricular coupling in vivo: analysis using pressure-volume relations. Anesthesiology 2001;95:689698.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Eger EI II, Gong D, Koblin DD, et al. The effect of anesthetic duration on kinetic and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane, and on the kinetic characteristics of Compound A, in volunteers. Anesth Analg 1998;86:414421.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Robinson BJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. A review of recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:185190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Yang NC, Wang HF, Hwang KL, et al. A novel method for determining the blood/gas partition coefficients of inhalation anesthetics to calculate the percentage of loss at different temperatures. J Anal Toxicol 2004;28:122127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Mutoh T, Kojima K, Takao K, et al. Comparison of sevoflurane with isoflurane for rapid mask induction in midazolam and butorphanol-sedated dogs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001;48:223230.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Johnson RA, Striler E, Sawyer DC, et al. Comparison of isoflurane with sevoflurane for anesthesia induction and recovery in adult dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998;59:478481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Love EJ, Holt PE, Murison PJ. Recovery characteristics following maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane or isoflurane in dogs premedicated with acepromazine. Vet Rec 2007;161:217221.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Polis I, Gasthuys F, Van Ham L, et al. Recovery times and evaluation of clinical hemodynamic parameters of sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane anaesthesia in mongrel dogs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2001;48:401411.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Bennett RC, Fancy SPJ, Walsh CM, et al. Comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane in dogs anaesthetised for clinical surgical or diagnostic procedures. J Small Anim Pract 2008;49:392397.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Nordmann GR, Read JA, Sale SM, et al. Emergence and recovery in children after desflurane and isoflurane anesthesia: effect of anesthesia duration. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:779785.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Whitehair KJ, Steffey EP, Willits NH, et al. Recovery of horses from inhalation anesthesia. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:16931702.

  • 14.

    Hofmeister EH, Brainard BM, Sams LM, et al. Evaluation of induction characteristics and hypnotic potency of isoflurane and sevoflurane in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:451456.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Sams L, Braun C, Allman D, et al. A comparison of the effects of propofol and etomidate on the induction of anesthesia and on cardiopulmonary parameters in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008;35:488494.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, et al. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:13361341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Valverde A, Morey TE, Hernández J, et al. Validation of several types of noxious stimuli for use in determining the minimum alveolar concentration for inhalation anesthetics in dogs and rabbits. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:957962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Galloway DS, Ko JC, Reaugh HF, et al. Anesthetic indices of sevoflurane and isoflurane in unpremedicated dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:700704.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Doorley BM, Waters SJ, Terrell RC, et al. MAC of I-653 in beagles dogs and New Zealand white rabbits. Anesthesiology 1988;69:8991.

  • 20.

    Gauman DM, Mustaki JP, Tassonyi E. MAC-awake of isoflurane, enflurane and halothane evaluated by slow and fast alveolar washout. Br J Anaesth 1992;68:8184.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Gomez-Villamandos RJ, Palacios C, Benitez A, et al. Effect of medetomidine infusion on the anaesthetic requirements of desflurane in dogs. Res Vet Sci 2008;84:6873.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Gomez-Villamandos RJ, Redondo JI, Martin EM, et al. Cardiorespiratory effects of desflurane in dogs given romifidine or medetomidine before induction of anesthesia with propofol. Can J Vet Res 2006;70:308312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Gomez-Villamandos RJ, Palacios C, Benitez A, et al. Dexmedetomidine or medetomidine premedication before propofol-desflurane anaesthesia in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2006;29:157163.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Martin MF, Lima JR, Ezquerra LJ, et al. Prolonged anesthesia with desflurane and fentanyl in dogs during conventional and laparoscopic surgery. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:941945.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Goto T, Nakata Y, Ishiguro Y, et al. Minimum alveolar concentration-awake of xenon alone and in combination with isoflurane or sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 2000;93:11881193.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Katoh T, Suguro Y, Kimura T, et al. Cerebral awakening concentration of sevoflurane and isoflurane predicted during slow and fast alveolar washout. Anesth Analg 1993;77:10121017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, et al. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2004;98:632641.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Mutoh T, Nishimura R, Kim HY, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane, compared with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane, in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1997;58:885890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Picker O, Schwarte LA, Schindler AW, et al. Desflurane increases heart rate independent of sympathetic activity in dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:945951.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement