Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed

Tammy M. Platt Feedlot Research Group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016.

Search for other papers by Tammy M. Platt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Guy H. Loneragan Feedlot Research Group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016.

Search for other papers by Guy H. Loneragan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
H. Morgan Scott Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by H. Morgan Scott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Bo Norby Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Bo Norby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 CMV, MPVM, PhD
,
Daniel U. Thomson Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Daniel U. Thomson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD, DVM
,
Michel S. Brown Feedlot Research Group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX 79016.

Search for other papers by Michel S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Samuel E. Ives Cactus Feeders, 2209 W 7th St, Amarillo, TX 79106.

Search for other papers by Samuel E. Ives in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Mindy M. Brashears International Center for Food Industry Excellence, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.

Search for other papers by Mindy M. Brashears in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate administration of chlortetracycline in feed of cattle as a method to select for tetracycline resistance among enteric bacteria in feedlot settings.

Animals—20 steers.

Procedures—Steers were randomly assigned to an exposed cohort (n = 10) or an unexposed cohort (control cohort; 10). Chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in cottonseed meal was administered to the exposed cohort on days 0 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 16. The control cohort was administered only cottonseed meal. Fecal samples were collected from 16 steers on days −7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, and 33, and Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp were isolated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of selected antimicrobials was estimated.

Results—Overall, 56.0% and 31.4% of E coli and Enterococcus isolates, respectively, were resistant to tetracycline. Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a significant temporary increase in log2 MIC for both genera but returned to preexposure values by day 33. Averaged across time, the proportion of tetracycline-resistant E coli and Enterococcus isolates was significantly greater in exposed than in unexposed steers. Although all ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates were coresistant to tetracycline, exposure to chlortetracycline led to a significant decrease in the proportion of E coli resistant to ceftiofur during exposure.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a temporary increase in the likelihood of recovering resistant bacteria. Exposure to chlortetracycline decreased the likelihood of recovering ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates, even though isolates were coresistant to tetracycline. These findings warrant further investigation.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate administration of chlortetracycline in feed of cattle as a method to select for tetracycline resistance among enteric bacteria in feedlot settings.

Animals—20 steers.

Procedures—Steers were randomly assigned to an exposed cohort (n = 10) or an unexposed cohort (control cohort; 10). Chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in cottonseed meal was administered to the exposed cohort on days 0 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 16. The control cohort was administered only cottonseed meal. Fecal samples were collected from 16 steers on days −7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, and 33, and Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp were isolated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of selected antimicrobials was estimated.

Results—Overall, 56.0% and 31.4% of E coli and Enterococcus isolates, respectively, were resistant to tetracycline. Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a significant temporary increase in log2 MIC for both genera but returned to preexposure values by day 33. Averaged across time, the proportion of tetracycline-resistant E coli and Enterococcus isolates was significantly greater in exposed than in unexposed steers. Although all ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates were coresistant to tetracycline, exposure to chlortetracycline led to a significant decrease in the proportion of E coli resistant to ceftiofur during exposure.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a temporary increase in the likelihood of recovering resistant bacteria. Exposure to chlortetracycline decreased the likelihood of recovering ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates, even though isolates were coresistant to tetracycline. These findings warrant further investigation.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 76 0 0
Full Text Views 2039 1535 191
PDF Downloads 292 130 2
Advertisement