Comparison of the pharmacokinetic properties of bisoprolol and carvedilol in healthy dogs

Gerald Beddies Research & Development—Clinical Research & Development, Animal Health Division, Bayer HealthCare AG, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany

Search for other papers by Gerald Beddies in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet
,
Philip R. Fox The Animal Medical Center, Caspary Institute, 510 E 62nd St, New York, NY 10065

Search for other papers by Philip R. Fox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Mark D. Papich Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606

Search for other papers by Mark D. Papich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Venkata-Rangaro Kanikanti Research & Development—Clinical Research & Development, Animal Health Division, Bayer HealthCare AG, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany

Search for other papers by Venkata-Rangaro Kanikanti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Ralph Krebber Research & Development, Bayer Crop Science AG, 40789 Monheim, Germany

Search for other papers by Ralph Krebber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr rer nat
, and
Bruce W. Keene Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606

Search for other papers by Bruce W. Keene in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

Objective—To compare the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability following oral and IV administration of bisoprolol, a second-generation β1-adrenoceptor–selective blocking agent, with those of carvedilol, a third-generation β12 and α1-adrenoceptor blocking agent, in dogs.

Animals—12 healthy adult Beagles.

Procedures—A prospective, parallel group study was performed. The dogs were allocated to 1 of 2 groups (6 dogs/group) and were administered orally a 1 mg/kg dose of either bisoprolol or carvedilol. Following a 1-week washout period, each cohort received a 1 mg/kg dose of the same drug IV. Blood samples were collected before and after drug administration, and serum concentrations, pharmacokinetic variables, and bioavailability for each agent were assessed.

Results—After oral administration of bisoprolol, the geometric mean value of the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was 2,195 μg/L (coefficient of variation [CV], 15%). After IV administration of bisoprolol, the dose-normalized geometric mean AUCinf was 2,402 μg/L (CV, 19%). Oral bioavailability of bisoprolol was 91.4%. After oral administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 70 μg/L (CV, 81%). After IV administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 491 μg/L (CV, 23%). Oral bioavailability of carvedilol was 14.3%. Total body clearance was low (0.42 L/h/kg) for bisoprolol and high (2.0 L/h/kg) for carvedilol.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—After oral administration, carvedilol underwent extensive first-pass metabolism and had limited bioavailability; bisoprolol had less first-pass effect and higher bioavailability. Collectively, these differences suggested that, in dogs, bisoprolol has less interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, compared with carvedilol.

Abstract

Objective—To compare the pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability following oral and IV administration of bisoprolol, a second-generation β1-adrenoceptor–selective blocking agent, with those of carvedilol, a third-generation β12 and α1-adrenoceptor blocking agent, in dogs.

Animals—12 healthy adult Beagles.

Procedures—A prospective, parallel group study was performed. The dogs were allocated to 1 of 2 groups (6 dogs/group) and were administered orally a 1 mg/kg dose of either bisoprolol or carvedilol. Following a 1-week washout period, each cohort received a 1 mg/kg dose of the same drug IV. Blood samples were collected before and after drug administration, and serum concentrations, pharmacokinetic variables, and bioavailability for each agent were assessed.

Results—After oral administration of bisoprolol, the geometric mean value of the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was 2,195 μg/L (coefficient of variation [CV], 15%). After IV administration of bisoprolol, the dose-normalized geometric mean AUCinf was 2,402 μg/L (CV, 19%). Oral bioavailability of bisoprolol was 91.4%. After oral administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 70 μg/L (CV, 81%). After IV administration of carvedilol, the geometric mean AUCinf was 491 μg/L (CV, 23%). Oral bioavailability of carvedilol was 14.3%. Total body clearance was low (0.42 L/h/kg) for bisoprolol and high (2.0 L/h/kg) for carvedilol.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—After oral administration, carvedilol underwent extensive first-pass metabolism and had limited bioavailability; bisoprolol had less first-pass effect and higher bioavailability. Collectively, these differences suggested that, in dogs, bisoprolol has less interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, compared with carvedilol.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 186 0 0
Full Text Views 2724 2275 74
PDF Downloads 795 444 20
Advertisement