Oral bioavailability of etoposide after administration of a single dose to tumor-bearing dogs

Andrea B. Flory Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Andrea B. Flory in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Kenneth M. Rassnick Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Kenneth M. Rassnick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Cheryl E. Balkman Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Cheryl E. Balkman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Michael A. Kiselow Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Michael A. Kiselow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Karoliina Autio Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Search for other papers by Karoliina Autio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Bernard B. Beaulieu Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth University, Lebanon, NH 03756.

Search for other papers by Bernard B. Beaulieu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
Lionel D. Lewis Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth University, Lebanon, NH 03756.

Search for other papers by Lionel D. Lewis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MB BCh, MD

Abstract

Objective—To characterize oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic disposition of etoposide when the IV formulation was administered orally to dogs.

Animals—8 tumor-bearing dogs.

Procedures—An open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Dogs were randomly assigned to initially receive a single dose of etoposide (50 mg/m2) IV or PO. A second dose was administered via the alternate route 3 to 7 days later. Medications were administered before IV administration of etoposide to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Oral administration of etoposide was prepared by reconstituting the parenteral formulation with 0.9% NaCl solution and further diluting the reconstituted mixture 1:1 with a sweetening agent. Plasma samples were obtained after both treatments. Etoposide concentrations were measured with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay, and plasma etoposide concentration–time profiles were analyzed by use of noncompartmental methods.

Results—4 dogs had hypersensitivity reactions during IV administration of etoposide. No adverse effects were detected after oral administration. Plasma etoposide concentrations were undetectable in 2 dogs after oral administration. Oral administration of etoposide resulted in significantly lower values for the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma etoposide concentration-versus-time curve, compared with results for IV administration. Oral bioavailability of etoposide was low (median, 13.4%) and highly variable among dogs (range, 5.7% to 57.3%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Vehicle-related toxicosis can limit the IV administration of etoposide in dogs. The parenteral formulation of etoposide can be safely administered orally to dogs, but routine use was not supported because of low and variable oral bioavailability in this study.

Abstract

Objective—To characterize oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic disposition of etoposide when the IV formulation was administered orally to dogs.

Animals—8 tumor-bearing dogs.

Procedures—An open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study was conducted. Dogs were randomly assigned to initially receive a single dose of etoposide (50 mg/m2) IV or PO. A second dose was administered via the alternate route 3 to 7 days later. Medications were administered before IV administration of etoposide to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Oral administration of etoposide was prepared by reconstituting the parenteral formulation with 0.9% NaCl solution and further diluting the reconstituted mixture 1:1 with a sweetening agent. Plasma samples were obtained after both treatments. Etoposide concentrations were measured with a high-performance liquid chromatography assay, and plasma etoposide concentration–time profiles were analyzed by use of noncompartmental methods.

Results—4 dogs had hypersensitivity reactions during IV administration of etoposide. No adverse effects were detected after oral administration. Plasma etoposide concentrations were undetectable in 2 dogs after oral administration. Oral administration of etoposide resulted in significantly lower values for the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma etoposide concentration-versus-time curve, compared with results for IV administration. Oral bioavailability of etoposide was low (median, 13.4%) and highly variable among dogs (range, 5.7% to 57.3%).

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Vehicle-related toxicosis can limit the IV administration of etoposide in dogs. The parenteral formulation of etoposide can be safely administered orally to dogs, but routine use was not supported because of low and variable oral bioavailability in this study.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 98 0 0
Full Text Views 712 534 108
PDF Downloads 270 143 14
Advertisement