In vitro efficacy of an ophthalmic drug combination against corneal pathogens of horses

Nicole C. Scotty University of Florida Veterinary Medical Center, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608.

Search for other papers by Nicole C. Scotty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Dennis E. Brooks University of Florida Veterinary Medical Center, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608.

Search for other papers by Dennis E. Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Crystal D. Schuman Rose University of Florida Veterinary Medical Center, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Clinical Microbiology, Serology, and Parasitology Laboratory Service, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608.

Search for other papers by Crystal D. Schuman Rose in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the in vitro efficacy of an ophthalmic drug combination against common corneal pathogens of horses.

Sample Population—Representative isolates of 3 bacterial and 2 fungal corneal pathogens of horses.

Procedures—Pathogens were subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing of a drug combination that consisted of equal volumes of natamycin 3.33%, tobramycin 0.3%, cefazolin 5.5%, and equine serum. Proteinase inhibitory activity of the drug combination was assessed by use of a fluorescence microplate assay with gelatin and collagen I as substrates. The MICs of the drug combination were compared with those for each of the component medications and antiproteinase activity of the drug combination was compared with that of serum by use of paired t tests and a 2-way ANOVA, respectively.

Results—The drug combination was at least as effective as each medication separately for inhibiting microbial growth of all pathogens tested and was significantly more effective against B-hemolytic Streptococcus spp, Aspergillus spp, and Fusarium spp than the relevant medications separately. Serum and the drug combination both had significant antigelatinase activity, and serum had significant anticollagenase activity. Antiproteinase activity of serum was a concentration-dependent event, which enabled serum to achieve significantly greater activity than the drug combination after 3.5 and 4 hours of intubation for the gelatin and collagen I assays, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Drug combinations have the attractive potential of minimizing the time, stress, and fatigue associated with topical treatment regimens consisting of multiple drugs used separately for horses with keratitis.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the in vitro efficacy of an ophthalmic drug combination against common corneal pathogens of horses.

Sample Population—Representative isolates of 3 bacterial and 2 fungal corneal pathogens of horses.

Procedures—Pathogens were subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing of a drug combination that consisted of equal volumes of natamycin 3.33%, tobramycin 0.3%, cefazolin 5.5%, and equine serum. Proteinase inhibitory activity of the drug combination was assessed by use of a fluorescence microplate assay with gelatin and collagen I as substrates. The MICs of the drug combination were compared with those for each of the component medications and antiproteinase activity of the drug combination was compared with that of serum by use of paired t tests and a 2-way ANOVA, respectively.

Results—The drug combination was at least as effective as each medication separately for inhibiting microbial growth of all pathogens tested and was significantly more effective against B-hemolytic Streptococcus spp, Aspergillus spp, and Fusarium spp than the relevant medications separately. Serum and the drug combination both had significant antigelatinase activity, and serum had significant anticollagenase activity. Antiproteinase activity of serum was a concentration-dependent event, which enabled serum to achieve significantly greater activity than the drug combination after 3.5 and 4 hours of intubation for the gelatin and collagen I assays, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Drug combinations have the attractive potential of minimizing the time, stress, and fatigue associated with topical treatment regimens consisting of multiple drugs used separately for horses with keratitis.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Scotty's present address is the Veterinary Medical Center, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Presented in part at the 37th Annual Conference of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists, San Antonio, Tex, November 2006.

The authors thank Scott Killian for assistance with antibacterial testing protocols and Annette Fothergill for assistance with antifungal testing protocols.

Address correspondence to Dr. Scotty.
  • 1.

    Brooks DE. Equine ophthalmology. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999;10761093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Ollivier FJ, Brooks DE, Kallberg ME, et al. Evaluation of various compounds to inhibit activity of matrix metalloproteinases in the tear film of horses with ulcerative keratitis. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:10811087.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Brooks DE. Inflammatory stromal keratopathies: medical management of stromal keratomalacia, stromal abscesses, eosinophilic keratitis, and band keratopathy in the horse. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2004;20:345360,vi.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Strubbe DT, Brooks DE, Schultz GS, et al. Evaluation of tear film proteinases in horses with ulcerative keratitis. Vet Ophthalmol 2000;3:111119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Samuelson DA. Ophthalmic anatomy. In: Gelatt KN, ed. Veterinary ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999;31150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    van der Rest M, Garrone R. Collagen family of proteins. FASEB J 1991;5:28142823.

  • 7.

    Miller TR. Principles of therapeutics. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1992;8:479497.

  • 8.

    Myrna KE, Herring IP. Constant rate infusion for topical ocular delivery in horses: a pilot study. Vet Ophthalmol 2006;9:15.

  • 9.

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard. M-38A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Hyams PJ, Simberkoff MS, Rahal JJ Jr. Synergy between cephalosporin and aminoglycoside antibiotics against Providencia and Proteus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1974;5:571577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Weinstein WL, Moore PA, Sanchez S, et al. In vitro efficacy of a buffered chelating solution as an antimicrobial potentiator for antifungal drugs against fungal pathogens obtained from horses with mycotic keratitis. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:562568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Haffner JC, Fecteau KA, Eiler H. Inhibition of collagenase breakdown of equine corneas by tetanus antitoxin, equine serum and acetylcysteine. Vet Ophthalmol 2003;6:6772.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Hinckle KM, Gerding PA, Kakoma I, et al. Evaluation of activity of selected ophthalmic antimicrobial agents in combination against common ocular microorganisms. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:316318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Berry M, Gurung A, Easty DL. Toxicity of antibiotics and antifungals on cultured human corneal cells: effect of mixing, exposure and concentration. Eye 1995;9:110115.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Chang SW, Chi RF, Wu CC, et al. Benzalkonium chloride and gentamicin cause a leak in corneal epithelial cell membrane. Exp Eye Res 2000;71:310.

Advertisement